What's new

DSI. The wunder tech.

Fcuk what do you talking about @undertakerwwefan :lol::enjoy: its aerodynamic tech known known to all aerospace companies of west @undertakerwwefan ;):enjoy: major drawbacks are its worked under the Mach-2, above that figure its useless @undertakerwwefan :agree:

Nope. Only AVIC and LM have DSI tech. No other company has.

J-20 has DSI and it is more than Mach 2. A bump has no relation to a specific Mach number. There is nothing special about the number 2. It's not a God number or something like that.
 
.
Nope. Only AVIC and LM have DSI tech. No other company has.

J-20 has DSI and it is more than Mach 2. A bump has no relation to a specific Mach number. There is nothing special about the number 2. It's not a God number or something like that.
You don't know nothing about aerospace tech @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: can't go Mach-2 plus with DSI/fixed because of airflow is different for MACH-2+ jet, and DSI/Fixed air intake Can't handled it, You need varible ramp air intakes for controlling/regulate the airflow to the engine, and name me one jet that uses DSI/Fixed air intake and goes beyond Mach-2+ @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah:
 
.
You don't know nothing about aerospace tech @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: can't go Mach-2 plus with DSI/fixed because of airflow is different for MACH-2+ jet, and DSI/Fixed air intake Can't handled it, You need varible ramp air intakes for controlling/regulate the airflow to the engine, and name me one jet that uses DSI/Fixed air intake and goes beyond Mach-2+ @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah:

I don't believe 2 is a special number like the speed of light, the ceiling of any object's speed in this universe. There is no reason to speculate DSI plane cannot go faster than Mach 2.

Anyway, this is what I find.

If the WS-15 meets design goals then J-20B’s cruise speed will be Mach 1.8 and maximum speed exceeds Mach 2.2. Those would equal the US F-22.

https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/...hould-have-improved-ws-15-engine-by-2019.html
 
.
I don't believe 2 is a special number like the speed of light, the ceiling of any object's speed in this universe. There is no reason to speculate DSI plane cannot go faster than Mach 2.

Anyway, this is what I find.

If the WS-15 meets design goals then J-20B’s cruise speed will be Mach 1.8 and maximum speed exceeds Mach 2.2. Those would equal the US F-22.

https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/...hould-have-improved-ws-15-engine-by-2019.html
Go to sleep you idiot top speed of the jet relies on its intake design, not engine @undertakerwwefan , If J-20 using high by pass ratio engine it can reach super cruise/ and reach i.8 mach- mach-2 just like F-35 @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: do research before you bark here @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah: And this link is trash you can't predict the future @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah:
 
.
Go to sleep you idiot top speed of the jet relies on its intake design, not engine @undertakerwwefan , If J-20 using high by pass ratio engine it can reach super cruise/ and reach i.8 mach- mach-2 just like F-35 @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: do research before you bark here @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah: And this link is trash you can't predict the future @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah:

Nope. Nothing special about the number 2. DSI plane can go faster than Mach 2 and don't you tell me shut up.
 
.
Air wars are not fought at mach 2.. I don't know fascination ...

Its like top speed on speedometer of your car can be 200 or 320 km/hour...

How much does it matter for day to day driving???
 
. .
Nope. Nothing special about the number 2. DSI plane can go faster than Mach 2 and don't you tell me shut up.
Source/proof and all aerospace companies are saying that DSI worked under the Mach-2, you know nothing about basic of aerodynamics aircraft engineering and you consider yourself proclaimed expert on aerodynamics/aircraft engineering what the fcuk @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: and tell me which jet with DSI can reach Mach-2+ speed with DSI @undertakerwwefan :crazy::crazy::crazy: and don't tell me J-20 was achieved with current WS-10B/AL-31FN J-20 can't super cruise lets forget MACH-2+ speed @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah: and there 2 type of engines low by pass ratio turbofan which using most of the 5th gen jets like F-119/Al-31/WS-10/AL-41F which acting like early turbo jets to go beyond Mach-2+, and high by pass ratio turbo fan which best for cruising at subsonic and Can't reach Mach-2( F-35 engine is high by pass ratio turbo fan F-135), that why high by pass ratio turbo fan using all airlines of the world for economic cruising/fuel efficiency @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:




Because the priorities for military aircraft (engines) are different. While it is true that the high bypass turbofans have better fuel economy (in cruise) and are less noisy, the low bypass engines offer significant advantages when we take into account their intended use in combat aircraft, such as:

  • The response of the low bypass turbofans to throttle adjustments is faster compared to the high bypass turbofans; the inertia is less and less air mass is involved (for increasing the velocity)- This is important during combat, when thrust requirements change rapidly.
  • They have less frontal area, reducing the drag produced. For aircraft expected to fly at supersonic speeds, however briefly, this is important.
  • Better thrust to weight ratio- 6:1 in Trent 1000 Vs 9:1 F119 (used in F-22 Raptor)- Even if the actual thrust produced by the low bypass turbofans is lesser, they produce more thrust per kg of engine, which means that the engine can be more compact in size.
  • The low bypass turbofans are more efficient at higher speeds compared to the high bypass turbofans.
  • The lesser size of the low-bypass turbofans mean that the aircraft can be made stealthier by 'burying' the engines in the fuselage, which is all but impossible in case of high bypass turbofans
 
.
Source/proof and all aerospace companies are saying that DSI worked under the Mach-2, you know nothing about basic of aerodynamics aircraft engineering and you consider yourself proclaimed expert on aerodynamics/aircraft engineering what the fcuk @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: and tell me which jet with DSI can reach Mach-2+ speed with DSI @undertakerwwefan :crazy::crazy::crazy: and don't tell me J-20 was achieved with current WS-10B/AL-31FN J-20 can't super cruise lets forget MACH-2+ speed @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah: and there 2 type of engines low by pass ratio turbofan which using most of the 5th gen jets like F-119/Al-31/WS-10/AL-41F which acting like early turbo jets to go beyond Mach-2+, and high by pass ratio turbo fan which best for cruising at subsonic and Can't reach Mach-2( F-35 engine is high by pass ratio turbo fan F-135), that why high by pass ratio turbo fan using all airlines of the world for economic cruising/fuel efficiency @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:




Because the priorities for military aircraft (engines) are different. While it is true that the high bypass turbofans have better fuel economy (in cruise) and are less noisy, the low bypass engines offer significant advantages when we take into account their intended use in combat aircraft, such as:

  • The response of the low bypass turbofans to throttle adjustments is faster compared to the high bypass turbofans; the inertia is less and less air mass is involved (for increasing the velocity)- This is important during combat, when thrust requirements change rapidly.
  • They have less frontal area, reducing the drag produced. For aircraft expected to fly at supersonic speeds, however briefly, this is important.
  • Better thrust to weight ratio- 6:1 in Trent 1000 Vs 9:1 F119 (used in F-22 Raptor)- Even if the actual thrust produced by the low bypass turbofans is lesser, they produce more thrust per kg of engine, which means that the engine can be more compact in size.
  • The low bypass turbofans are more efficient at higher speeds compared to the high bypass turbofans.
  • The lesser size of the low-bypass turbofans mean that the aircraft can be made stealthier by 'burying' the engines in the fuselage, which is all but impossible in case of high bypass turbofans

Who do you think you are? Don't act so arrogant young man.
 
. .
Who do you think you are? Don't act so arrogant young man.
and your arrogation young not me look at your age you're only 20 year old, i did research a lot of aerodynamics and aircrafts engineering long time ago, actually i am crazy to get information about aerodynamics/aerospace fields and still researching aerodynamics/aerospace a lot, i know/undertstand lot better than you kid @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
and your arrogation young not me look at your age you're only 20 year old, i did research a lot of aerodynamics and aircrafts engineering long time ago, actually i am crazy to get information about aerodynamics/aerospace fields and still researching aerodynamics/aerospace a lot, i know/undertstand lot better than you kid @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:

Then you should know 2 is not a universal constant. Anyway, China makes every plane DSI. That proves Mach 2 is not limit like speed of light is limit.
 
.
Then you should know 2 is not a universal constant. Anyway, China makes every plane DSI. That proves Mach 2 is not limit like speed of light is limit.
What the shit is universal constant, are you trying to say that DSI can go through Mach-2+ than you are all wrong, DSI equipped best used under the Mach-2 and doesn't reach Mach-2+, and you think Lockheed Martin is fool that telling that DSI can't work beyond Mach-2+ @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
What the shit is universal constant, are you trying to say that DSI can go through Mach-2+ than you are all wrong, DSI equipped best used under the Mach-2 and doesn't reach Mach-2+, and you think Lockheed Martin is fool that telling that DSI can't work beyond Mach-2+ @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:

I don't believe DSI prevents a plane going faster than Mach 2. If you have proof then please share it.
 
.
Yes they do move. There are ramps inside that move all the time to adjust air flow. Only DSI does not move.
You are wrong, as usual. I was on the F-16 for five yrs. There is not a single moving part on the F-16's intake system.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom