What's new

Doklam: PLA gen snubs hawks baying for India’s blood

Suriya

BANNED
Joined
Jul 23, 2017
Messages
4,149
Reaction score
-42
Country
India
Location
India
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ing-for-indias-blood/articleshow/60504818.cms

Doklam: PLA gen snubs hawks baying for India’s blood


HIGHLIGHTS
  • The Chinese leadership is 'unhappy' with hawks who demanded military action against India during the Doklam stand-off.
  • Qiao Liang, a serving major general of the PLA wrote in a column in Global Times that anti-India commentators don't have a “clear understanding of China’s strategic positioning”.
BEIJING: China has signalled that it is unhappy with hawks demanding military action against India after the Doklam episode+ . The government's views came from a major general of the People's Liberation Army, who said the anti-India commentators do not have a "clear understanding of China's strategic positioning+ ".

"China and India are both neighbours and competitors, but not all competitors must be treated in the toughest way," Maj Gen Qiao Liang, also military strategist, wrote in the Beijing-based Global Times.

Being a sitting PLA officer — his current seniority indicates he's well regarded by authorities — it's evident he was speaking for the government, which is keen on advancing business ties with India.

Qiao had in 1999 co-authored 'Unrestricted Warfare', a well-received book discussing how a nation like China could defeat a technologically superior opponent (such as the US) through "smart power".

The Chinese government has been under pressure from hawks who've been asking why it entered into an agreement with India at Doklam instead of giving it a bloody nose. Qiao's article is obviously the government's reply to this criticism ahead of a crucial Communist Party Congress, which will determine the next batch of top leaders in October.

Qiao wrote: "The Doklam confrontation was solved in the way it should have been... we should spare no efforts to avoid pushing the country into a war as peace is the best outcome." This is the first time since the Doklam crisis that a Chinese military officer has talked about the need to avoid war.

"Many people would say that road construction in China's territory was none of India's business. Is this belief right? It's reasonable to some extent because road construction in this area is not a matter of right and wrong, but we need to understand that it's not always right to do something right at any time. Only doing the right thing at the right time is correct," Qiao said.


The officer even challenged Communist dreamers who believe China should exert its military capabilities to give itself a dominant position.




"Many people think that... only war can demonstrate China's power. But resorting to war is irresponsible... Whenever there may be a way to solve a conflict without war, war should be avoided," he said. His comments are pertinent as economically backward North Korea has kept countries on tenterhooks with its threat of using nuclear missiles.



 
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1066076.shtml

War must always be the last resort in disputes : Maj Gen Qiao Liang


The title of China's role in future world written by Wang Xiangsui, retired Air Force Senior Colonel and professor at the Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, says it all, that is the importance of China's strategic positioning in the future.

The reason why so many Chinese people paid attention to the China-India border standoff in the Doklam area is that they are unfamiliar with China's strategic positioning. If they had a clear understanding of China's strategic positioning, they would know that the settlement of the Doklam standoffwas one of the best results possible. China and India are both neighbors and competitors, but not all competitors must be treated in the toughest way.

Many people would say that the road construction in China's territory was none of India's business. Is this belief right? It is reasonable to some extent because road construction in this area is not a matter of right and wrong, but we need to understand that it is not always right to do something right at any time. Only doing the right thing at the right time is correct.

So, with this principle in mind, one can understand that the Doklam confrontation was solved in the way it should have been. And the most important thing is that when you understand China's strategic positioning and you cannot bring the entire world under your domination, you are willing to leave well enough alone. Only in this way can one completely reach his goal, otherwise, haste makes waste or the result and your desired outcome may even be poles apart.

Many people think that China has a powerful national strength, including a strong military power, thus only war can demonstrate China's power. But resorting to war is irresponsible for the country and the country's future as war has always been the last resort to solve problems. Whenever there may be a way to solve a conflict without war, war should be avoided.

Some people may say that I am a soldier and what I said above reflects a lack of confidence in my country. It's true that I am a military scholar that study strategies. I'm not afraid of war, and I know what war is about. But for any country, the war is always an unfortunate thing. Yet each soldier wants to fight in the war once in his lifetime, which could honor his life.

This is the wish of all of us soldiers. We know that war is ominous. The country can maintain peace and it will be the best to avoid war.

Soldiers can realize their values better in the battlefield, so in this case, what choices should we make? When the country needs soldiers to fight in the battlefield, they will absolutely choose to join the war without hesitation. But in the country's current position, we should spare no efforts to avoid pushing the country into a war as peace is the best outcome.

The author is a Chinese military strategist Major-General of the People's Liberation Army. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn
 
Last edited:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ing-for-indias-blood/articleshow/60504818.cms

Doklam: PLA gen snubs hawks baying for India’s blood


HIGHLIGHTS



    • The Chinese leadership is 'unhappy' with hawks who demanded military action against India during the Doklam stand-off.
    • Qiao Liang, a serving major general of the PLA wrote in a column in Global Times that anti-India commentators don't have a “clear understanding of China’s strategic positioning”.
BEIJING: China has signalled that it is unhappy with hawks demanding military action against India after the Doklam episode+ . The government's views came from a major general of the People's Liberation Army, who said the anti-India commentators do not have a "clear understanding of China's strategic positioning+ ".

"China and India are both neighbours and competitors, but not all competitors must be treated in the toughest way," Maj Gen Qiao Liang, also military strategist, wrote in the Beijing-based Global Times.

Being a sitting PLA officer — his current seniority indicates he's well regarded by authorities — it's evident he was speaking for the government, which is keen on advancing business ties with India.

Qiao had in 1999 co-authored 'Unrestricted Warfare', a well-received book discussing how a nation like China could defeat a technologically superior opponent (such as the US) through "smart power".

The Chinese government has been under pressure from hawks who've been asking why it entered into an agreement with India at Doklam instead of giving it a bloody nose. Qiao's article is obviously the government's reply to this criticism ahead of a crucial Communist Party Congress, which will determine the next batch of top leaders in October.

Qiao wrote: "The Doklam confrontation was solved in the way it should have been... we should spare no efforts to avoid pushing the country into a war as peace is the best outcome." This is the first time since the Doklam crisis that a Chinese military officer has talked about the need to avoid war.

"Many people would say that road construction in China's territory was none of India's business. Is this belief right? It's reasonable to some extent because road construction in this area is not a matter of right and wrong, but we need to understand that it's not always right to do something right at any time. Only doing the right thing at the right time is correct," Qiao said.


The officer even challenged Communist dreamers who believe China should exert its military capabilities to give itself a dominant position.




"Many people think that... only war can demonstrate China's power. But resorting to war is irresponsible... Whenever there may be a way to solve a conflict without war, war should be avoided," he said. His comments are pertinent as economically backward North Korea has kept countries on tenterhooks with its threat of using nuclear missiles.



This is the authentic voice of a responsible major power. We should similarly quell our own hawks, in fact, squash them flat for their irresponsible behaviour.

In a curious way, General Qiao's comments are a counterpoint to his book, which discussed how militarily weak powers could take on stronger powers and win, or at the least give it a good fight.
 
In a curious way, General Qiao's comments are a counterpoint to his book, which discussed how militarily weak powers could take on stronger powers and win, or at the least give it a good fight.

He was probably thinking India , being the weaker power would give good fight in the current context . Hence he is shouting peace off .;)
 
"Many people would say that road construction in China's territory was none of India's business. Is this belief right? It's reasonable to some extent because road construction in this area is not a matter of right and wrong, but we need to understand that it's not always right to do something right at any time. Only doing the right thing at the right time is correct," Qiao said.
Wow. If only Pakistan could learn this sort of strategic thinking.


"it's not always right to do something right at any time. Only doing the right thing at the right time is correct,"
 
He was probably thinking India , being the weaker power would give good fight in the current context . Hence he is shouting peace off .;)

Actually, what I had in mind was that India is here the weaker power, and could, potentially, though not at present, put up the kind of stout resistance that he had in mind for China herself vis-a-vis the US or the USSR.

It is a pity that we are unable to transform our own military given the broad and wide human resources that we have, that is not used, and that is capable of giving us an enormous advantage beyond the conventional military range of options.

Wow. If only Pakistan could learn this sort of strategic thinking.


"it's not always right to do something right at any time. Only doing the right thing at the right time is correct,"

Absolutely brilliant.

That they have thinkers and strategists of this calibre really spooks me.
 
Destroying india is too easy.

Its just that when india disappears off the map so does 1.4 billion customer market for 2nd hand/obsolete goods

Who would buy nokia 8210 in 2017?

Only indian market. Hard truths.
 
Destroying india is too easy.

Its just that when india disappears off the map so does 1.4 billion customer market for 2nd hand/obsolete goods

Who would buy nokia 8210 in 2017?

Only indian market. Hard truths.

With this silly post have you met your mandated quota of daily anti India posts to make ?
 
India gdp per capita is 50% of philippines and same as nigeria

In fact the reason why india exist is simple.

why USA exist? To be innovator and scientist

why China exist? To be top producer

why India exist? to be taken advantage by USA and China.

india virtually exports nothing except phone calls at call center.

If one day all call centers close india will go back to chandragupta period

Ha ha..

As expected ... missed the point !!!
 
Releasing this article is a very sly move by China! Assymetrical warfare strategy indeed!
 
Yeah same applies to Pakistan next time.
Yes like 1948, 1965, 1971 & 1999.

Wa
Destroying india is too easy.

Its just that when india disappears off the map so does 1.4 billion customer market for 2nd hand/obsolete goods

Who would buy nokia 8210 in 2017?

Only indian market. Hard truths.
Wake up.
Are you from Singapore?
 
Yes like 1948, 1965, 1971 & 1999.
1948 we manage to liberate 35% of Kashmir plus 10% goes to China,
1965 we destroy your air force and your wish to drink tea at Lahore turned like this you GOC runs in fields like headless chicken by leaving behind command jeep.
1971 not you but your trained fighter won and we can win but in that case civilian loss of life would be massive so decided to free A kind of lunghi clad.
1999 we humiliate you and YOU India begs to USA and our jelly leg Prime Minister agrees.
 
Back
Top Bottom