C130
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2014
- Messages
- 8,092
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
when the U.S retired the F-111 and F-14 we lost a lot of our long range fighter capability besides the F-15E, so wouldn't it beeasy to develop and build a fighter bomber to take advantage of lesson learned from the F-35, and put that knowledge into a better air frame for long range?
I'm thinking the aircraft has to be 90 feet long and have a MTOW of 60 tonnes
weapons bay is 7.5 meters long and 2 meters wide enough space to carry either 8 1000 pound JDAMS, 16 SDB, or 4 JSOW-ER in the internal weapons bay. 6 hard points external to carry external fuel and other weapons.
this aircraft will be swept wing, partial stealth like the F-15SE to save on costs.
each bird shouldn't cost more than $150 million dollars. R&D shouldn't be more than $5 billion, buy 250, total program cost to design and build shouldn't be more than $50 billion.
we can start retiring the B-52 and some of F-15Eoffset the costs, and less buys of the F-35
a fleet of 100 B-1B, 21, B-2, 100 B-21, and 250 FB-XXX would be ideal
I'm thinking the aircraft has to be 90 feet long and have a MTOW of 60 tonnes
weapons bay is 7.5 meters long and 2 meters wide enough space to carry either 8 1000 pound JDAMS, 16 SDB, or 4 JSOW-ER in the internal weapons bay. 6 hard points external to carry external fuel and other weapons.
this aircraft will be swept wing, partial stealth like the F-15SE to save on costs.
each bird shouldn't cost more than $150 million dollars. R&D shouldn't be more than $5 billion, buy 250, total program cost to design and build shouldn't be more than $50 billion.
we can start retiring the B-52 and some of F-15Eoffset the costs, and less buys of the F-35
a fleet of 100 B-1B, 21, B-2, 100 B-21, and 250 FB-XXX would be ideal
Last edited: