What's new

Does China PR machinery respect itself enough.

Does China PR machinery respect itself enough at present (see quote)


  • Total voters
    8

ThatDamnGood

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
441
Reaction score
0
Russia needs American arrogance to defend its history - English pravda.ru

"Look at what the USA does. Even after a series of shocking publications on Wikileaks, the stronghold of world democracy does not tone down its arrogance: officials of the US administration continue saying that they bring good, law and order to the rest of the world. Russia will have to deal with these endless political claims until its learns to respect herself," the expert concluded.

Xi Jinping obviously does respect himself with his remark about the US exporting revolution, etc. But how many of the rest?
 
American spin.
Watch and learn.

Lately, there have been MSM reports that stated China's view that Japan current economic state can be attributed to Plaza Accords. Off course, most of the Japanese public are quite clueless about it not understanding whys of their bubble economy.

Off course, if the Japanese public come to understand this, they will not be so happy with their current BFF.

So what to do? Get ready to spin it. Watch how fast the Americans go to work. Is China's PR machinery that fast? And by fast, I don't mean have to lie but quickly and effectively present its case.

Asia Times Online :: Japan News and Japanese Business and Economy

"I have argued in my own writing that the bubble economy was a deliberate policy response to the Plaza Accord [of 1985, to depreciate the US dollar in relation to the yen and the deutschemark] and that its origins can be traced as far back as the Tanaka cabinet's announced intention to redevelop the Japanese archipelago"

In other words, its all Japan's fault in the end.

Now that is spin.
First you do your best to deny that the relationship Plaza Accords
and the bubble economy. When it cannot be denied, you spin it.
Here's one way, but what brought about the Plaza Accord is YOUR FREAKING DOING!

News and analysis, Made in the USA. Finger linkin goodness.
 
Excuse me sir but what are you trying to prove here?? You see even after these spins if people like u and me can know the obvious truth does the so called spin do any work. I mean people busy in earning their livelihood least care about this. So only people who take out time to read about this will come to know and they can form their ideas can't they. I mean to say that you should be happy that your government does not engage in such blatant falsehood.

I would be very proud of it.
 
No taking spin is good because in the long run people will lose confidence in news that do not report as it is and then they will increasingly turn toward ones that do honest reporting.
 
I never said lie.
What I am saying is that there must be a prompt and effective counter.

Right now, Japan says its a meek small island who is a pacifist who does not engage in strong arm negotiations, etc, etc.
But obviously it can easily be should be to otherwise.
Yet China's PR machinery does not do so.

WTF.
 
China Daily vs Westerner Blog.

Westerner Blog wins one for China. China Daily - FAILED.

Don't believe, read on.
Please compare.

China won't significantly cut rare earth exports

BEIJING - China will reduce its rare earth export quotas next year, but not by a very large margin, Yao Jian, spokesman of China's Ministry of Commerce, said Tuesday.

"To protect the environment and natural resources, China will stick to the quota system to manage rare earth exports next year, and quotas will also decline," Yao told Xinhua.

Though giving no clear extent of the decline, Yao's remarks echoed the comments of Wang Jian, a vice minister of commerce, made Monday at a press conference.

"I believe China will see no large rise or fall in rare earth exports next year," said Wang.

Wang emphasized that China has no embargo on rare earth exports, even though it uses a quota-system as a method of management.

Containing a class of 17 chemical elements, rare earths have been widely employed in manufacturing sophisticated products including flat-screen monitors, electric car batteries, wind turbines, missiles and aerospace alloys. However, mining the metals is very damaging to the environment.

Chinese officials have said on many occasions that China will strictly protect its non-renewable resources to prevent environmental damages due to over-exploitation and reckless mining.

China started the quota system on rare earth exports in 1998 and later banned it in processing trade. In 2006, China stopped granting new rare earth mining licenses and existing mines have since been operating according to government plans.

In early September, the State Council, or China's Cabinet, unveiled regulations to encourage merger and acquisitions within the industry.

However, China's restrictive policies were criticized by Japan, the United States and other European countries, claiming China's management violated World Trade Organization rules.

"China has no choice but to take such measures," Chen Deming, China's commerce minister, said in August. He pointed out that exports of rare earths should not threaten the country's environment or national security.

In response to the increasing criticism of China's rare earth exports management, the spokesman for China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology said last week that China "will not use rare earths as a bargaining chip".

"It is the common strategy of some countries, such as the United States, to use global resources while conserving their own in their homeland," said Zhang Hanlin, director of China Institute for WTO Studies in China's University of International Business and Economics.

"Creating conflicts on resource issues for their self interests is a common practice," he said.

China is the world's largest producer and exporter of rare earths. With about one-third of all proven rare earth reserves, China's exports account for more than 90 percent of the world total.

"This shows some countries are conserving rare earth resources, " said Yao.

Early media reports said China would reduce the export quotas by up to 30 percent in 2011. Yet, this was denied as "false" and "groundless" by the Ministry of Commerce.

The ministry said the Chinese government will set the 2011 export quotas based upon the rare earths output, market demand and the needs for sustainable development.

It also said China would continue to supply rare earths to the world. Meanwhile, it will also take measures to limit the exploitation, production and exports of rare earths to maintain sustainable development, which is in line with WTO principles.

"Some countries managed to meet the openness requirement of international trade policies when limiting its resources exports," said Feng Jun, a director of the Shanghai WTO Affairs Consultation Center.

"China should learn from the experiences and explore its own
way of protecting its strategic resources," said Feng.

****************************************************

Westerner Blog.
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article23957.html

Rare earth metals company Molycorp, Inc. (MCP) owns the largest deposit of rare earth minerals outside of China and its Mountain Pass deposit in California is the only deposit of any significance in the western hemisphere. MCP is one of the two companies that plan to operate rare earth mines within the next two years in an effort to meet the huge demand expected. MCP’s announcement to reopen its mines has more than doubled its share prices over the second half of this year.

Analyst Hunter Hillcoat at Investec Bank Australia Ltd said, “There’re only two genuine new companies coming on-stream that can offer a meaningful level of production and that’s Molycorp in the States and Lynas in Australia.” He opined that the only risk is that “you have to assume they can bring on production seamlessly and that the price is still at the same level by the time they’re in production.”

China produces almost 97% of the world’s rare earth metals and the continuous tightening of its export quota has nations scrambling to find alternative sources. In such a scenario, companies such as MCP stand to make tremendous gains if they play their cards rights. MCP plans to produce 20,000 tonnes per year of rare earth metals from 2012 and may even raise that capacity to 40,000 tonnes per year.

Speaking at a recent conference in China, Shigeo Nakamura, President of Advanced Material Japan Corp., said that China might further restrict its export quota next year, contributing to an already rising price curve. The primary concern now is the short and medium term supply since no other major project is likely to begin production before 2015–16.

Amidst global criticism of China’s increasing supply restrictions, CEO Mark A. Smith of MCP played down China’s role and commented, “There’s enough reason for what they’re doing that one could argue they aren’t using it as a weapon.” He said that China has been reducing its export quota by an average 6% over the last nine years and although this year’s quota has been stricter than earlier years, the move is not a new one. He appreciated the fact that China is making every effort to regulate production and prevent smuggling while trying to meet its domestic demand. Smith said, “I really admire what they are trying to do to correct the industry as a whole.”

Reacting to international concerns, spokesman Zhu Hongren of China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology said, “China will not use rare earths as an instrument for bargaining. Instead, we hope to cooperate with other countries in the use of rare earths on the basis of win-win outcomes and jointly protecting this un-renewable resource.”

*****************************************************

"Westerner Blog wins one for China. China Daily - FAILED."

Agree?

No some will say, China is for a local audience. WRONG way to see things. Very wrong way to see things.

China's PR Machinery, better wake up and do your job properly and not muddle around like some zombie.

At the very least, quality should match a simple blogger...
 
I never said lie.
What I am saying is that there must be a prompt and effective counter.

Right now, Japan says its a meek small island who is a pacifist who does not engage in strong arm negotiations, etc, etc.
But obviously it can easily be should be to otherwise.
Yet China's PR machinery does not do so.

WTF.

Well from the little understanding i have of Chinese way of working i think they are mostly introvert type. They don't make comments or talk officially unless required explicitly. It is their style of working which is also good. I could also be wrong.
 
Well from the little understanding i have of Chinese way of working i think they are mostly introvert type. They don't make comments or talk officially unless required explicitly. It is their style of working which is also good. I could also be wrong.

Not taking the bull by the horns is a way to getting pummelled like its happening now. You have to take the bull by the horns not because of your inner needs but because that's what needs to be done to stop the bull(sh*t).
 
Not taking the bull by the horns is a way to getting pummelled like its happening now. You have to take the bull by the horns not because of your inner needs but because that's what needs to be done to stop the bull(sh*t).

Agreed with u sir, but old habits die hard. China is moving on to greater things now with the development on all fronts gauranteed. However building the kind of PR machinery the west has will take time and with new age leaders coming in i think this will be done in future. However i will stick to my point it is not needed that a thing is to be done just because we can do it but do it only when required. I hope u got my point.
 
Back
Top Bottom