What's new

Do you want to throw a nuclear bomb or launch a nuclear missile?

navel reactor and submarine builded with complete Russian consultancy.. Pakistan have been reportedly working on the navel reactor..
Navel Reactor? :lol: You mean this?
upload_2017-9-4_3-24-39.png


Jokes apart, Pakistan is yet to operate a single Nuclear Submarine while India has quite a long experience in that. At least a decade long. So... cya in around 10-15 years!
 
.
nasr warhead is 30 cm wide and cramming in the trigger mechanism int such small space id some engineering feat.
thats why megaton yield tons heavy nucleaar bombs were made earlier than small tactical nukes.
 
. .
Try researching on the civilian nuclear programs, and research in fundamental physics, and compare that to Pakistan.
We still got CERN membership earlier than India. That speaks volumes on its own.
 
.
We still got CERN membership earlier than India. That speaks volumes on its own.

If you look at other members like Yugoslavia, Poland, Cyprus, Slovenia, Serbia, who got membership before Pakistan or India in CERN, and doesn't have any active nuclear program nor have they designed any reactor by indigenous effort, the sham of being inducted into CERN by technical superiority fades away. And United States, Russia and China not being a member states adds to my point too. Are you assuming that Pakistan's nuclear program is advanced than these respective countries?

But if you look into the research papers published from India regarding nuclear research and fundamental physics, and their impact factors in the respective field, Pakistan will be dwarfed by a huge margin.
 
.
If you look at other members like Yugoslavia, Poland, Cyprus, Slovenia, Serbia, who got membership before Pakistan or India in CERN, and doesn't have any active nuclear program nor have they designed any reactor by indigenous effort, the sham of being inducted into CERN by technical superiority fades away. And United States, Russia and China not being a member states adds to my point too. Are you assuming that Pakistan's nuclear program is advanced than these respective countries?

But if you look into the research papers published from India regarding nuclear research and fundamental physics, and their impact factors in the respective field, Pakistan will be dwarfed by a huge margin.

tHATS BECAUSE iNDIA CHURNS OUT TOO MANY jOBLESS phd WHO WRITE THOSE PAPARES AND LATER SELL jILAIBEE :D
 
.
The onus is on the one who claimed that Pakistan has 250KT yield weapon to prove it. Pakistan has not formally declared a nuclear doctrine, but it is well known that nuclear weapons are its first line of defence. Its presumed "first-use" policy is aimed at negating India's conventional military superiority by projecting a low nuclear threshold.

I hope so, India already has a better nuclear programme compared to us...
The fighter-bombers likely drop 150 kt bombs or launch cruise missiles with 20–25 kt warheads. The most powerful warheads in Pakistan's arsenal are estimated to have a yield 300–500 kt, delivered by the Ghauri-I MRBM

https://www.quora.com/How-lethal-ar...-there-is-a-strong-chance-of-a-nuclear-attack
 
.
and then there are high yield strategic nukes too

Pakistan has low yield tactical nukes, I have no idea where people get this figure of 250KT for Pakistan. .... As for North Korea I believe they have tested their largest yield today and x5 larger than their previous 15KT yield nuke.
 
.
The fighter-bombers likely drop 150 kt bombs or launch cruise missiles with 20–25 kt warheads. The most powerful warheads in Pakistan's arsenal are estimated to have a yield 300–500 kt, delivered by the Ghauri-I MRBM
Not quite. The biggest tested warhead/bomb will be around 10-20 Kilotonne. No nuclear power on earth deployed warheads without testing the design first to the desired yield.
 
.
Actually no. India is simply too big, even Allah himself with Mohammad riding on a flying horse won't be able to do it. Try it on nukemap with 200 nukes each of yield 50 Kt or so and try to cover even 40 % of Indian population centres. You will know the futility of your claim.

I don't know why you got a negative rating

Nukes are not necessary to destroy each and every city. Few cities gone, economies tumble

North Korea is doing whatever to bring us on negotiating table at even terms US has to sit on table otherwise North Korea will test the might of USallies and even US if nuclear bomb of us in hershima is nightmare just imagine 50 ton hydrogen bomb what it will be

It's 50 mega ton.

So, how can they deliver this war head?

tHATS BECAUSE iNDIA CHURNS OUT TOO MANY jOBLESS phd WHO WRITE THOSE PAPARES AND LATER SELL jILAIBEE :D
May be Pakistan produces all employed graduates who are very busy at work and unable to produce much research:woot:

Good going for pakistan

Not quite. The biggest tested warhead/bomb will be around 10-20 Kilotonne. No nuclear power on earth deployed warheads without testing the design first to the desired yield.
You can safely assume that what ever NK is testing will be of pakistan too
So I think they have 100 kt nukes now
Question is can it be mounted on missiles
 
.
okes apart, Pakistan is yet to operate a single Nuclear Submarine while India has quite a long experience in that. At least a decade long. So... cya in around 10-15 years!

i think its right time to lease one from China for training purpose.
 
.
Here's this default site that lets you:
Choose your nuclear weapon, manufacturer and target country
http://www.nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

View attachment 422863

Enter:
  • Choose the target country and city
  • Choose the type and size of the bomb or nuclear missile you will hit
  • Specify the blasting results you want:
you get:
  • Number of deaths
  • Number of wounded
  • Size of destruction
  • Nuclear radiation radius

Lol already had some fun with this site months ago.

I'm a sick man.
 
.
That will indeed will be a rational choice provided finances are inplace.
i think its right time to lease one from China for training purpose.
indeed

I don't know why you got a negative rating

Nukes are not necessary to destroy each and every city. Few cities gone, economies tumble



It's 50 mega ton.

So, how can they deliver this war head?


May be Pakistan produces all employed graduates who are very busy at work and unable to produce much research:woot:

Good going for pakistan


You can safely assume that what ever NK is testing will be of pakistan too
So I think they have 100 kt nukes now
Question is can it be mounted on missiles
Oh well. Given the nature of North Korea, this weapon and its design will be in worlds black market soon. It's not just Pakistan, Iran and others will be getting it. Hell! India will love to have few pieces, for purely educational purposes that is

Lol already had some fun with this site months ago.

I'm a sick man.
This site is fairly old. It has issues like it does not allow you to simulate mirv easily. May be I should upgrade it with few more features.
 
.
Oh well. Given the nature of North Korea, this weapon and its design will be in worlds black market soon. It's not just Pakistan, Iran and others will be getting it. Hell! India will love to have few pieces, for purely educational purposes that is
.

That's something USA should fear
If possible India should get the blue prints to estimate the output
 
.
That's something USA should fear
If possible India should get the blue prints to estimate the output
Why do you think they are going ape over this development? NK getting a missile worthy warhead design of 100 Kiloton = New wal-mart of strategic nuclear weapons.
There is no 'if possible'. India will get the blueprints via some front company or party. North Korea has/had front companies offering construction services. In reality they sold Missile technology. Infact, more the US pressed NK, more this will happen and faster! 'Made in Korea' is no longer the smartphone brand.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom