What's new

Do you want to throw a nuclear bomb or launch a nuclear missile?

Minaturized tested upto 15-20 Kt. Devices upto 30-40 KT. But India claims it has 200-250 Kt bomb and Pakistan says, 'FU your KTs we will burn you all anyhow! InshaAllah'
and Pakistan can do what it claims and even the kali Mata herself cant save bharat Auntie
http://wsn.globalo.com/India/siddharth-srivastava/Indian-army-backed-out-of-Pakistan-attack

There is no evidence that suggests that Pakistan at this moment has deployed thermonuclear high yield warheads. As for UK/USA/Russia they don't have threat of neighbour next door conventionally more powerful than them. Pakistan nukes are for India only ....
nato did have threat of a conventionally more powerful adversary in Soviet era
 
.
and Pakistan can do what it claims and even the kali Mata herself cant save bharat Auntie
http://wsn.globalo.com/India/siddharth-srivastava/Indian-army-backed-out-of-Pakistan-attack
Actually no. India is simply too big, even Allah himself with Mohammad riding on a flying horse won't be able to do it. Try it on nukemap with 200 nukes each of yield 50 Kt or so and try to cover even 40 % of Indian population centres. You will know the futility of your claim.
 
.
Actually no. India is simply too big, even Allah himself with Mohammad riding on a flying horse won't be able to do it. Try it on nukemap with 200 nukes each of yield 50 Kt or so and try to cover even 40 % of Indian population centres. You will know the futility of your claim.
we can do it that is the only reason indian had to back every time after barking and showing false bravdo be it 1998 2001-2008 or 2016 tensions and don't talk big Allah's men without nukes and sophisticated tech and flying hourses have kicked your butts for 1000 years so you should be the last one to talk about it and be thankful to brits for saving your ***
 
.
we can do it that is the only reason indian had to back every time after barking and showing false bravdo be it 1998 2001-2008 or 2016 tensions and don't talk big Allah's men without nukes and sophisticated tech and flying hourses have kicked your butts for 1000 years so you should be the last one to talk about it and be thankful to brits for saving your ***
:lol: You have proved my point. Thanks for the instant example!
@gslv mk3 saw that? Isn't it "We don't give a damn about yield etc. We will BURN YOU ALL!!!!1111oneoneoneoneeleven After all we RULED YOU FOR 1000000000000000000000000 years!!!! You are afraid of us thats why you run in fear of all our provocations!!111"
 
.
:lol: You have proved my point. Thanks for the instant example!
keep laughing it is the second stage
the words of your own leader
great-again-first-they-ignore-you-then-they-laugh-at-2522325.png
 
. .
ALL!!!!1111oneoneoneoneeleven After all we RULED YOU FOR 1000000000000000000000000 years!!!! You are afraid of us thats why you run in fear of all our provocations!!111"
side effecting of skipping last 1000 years from Indian history books
 
. . . .
for example?
SLBM, nuclear submarine, higher yield bombs, ICBM, way more nuclear material.

there isnt anything called turkee


he is the one who was saying babur CM is useless since it cant target Calcutta if launched from islamabad

Distance from Islamabad to Kolkata 1,939 km Babur CM range is 750km max. How is it suppose to reach Calcutta from Islamabad if its range is 750km, it needs at least 1,939km to reach Calcutta from Islamabad.
 
.
SLBM, nuclear submarine, higher yield bombs, ICBM, way more nuclear material.

Why do you need ICBMs? who do you want to invade on other continent?

navel reactor and submarine builded with complete Russian consultancy.. Pakistan have been reportedly working on the navel reactor..

Higher yield bombs? when did that happen, last i remember they tested in 40kt range same as Pakistan..

for what you need way more nuclear material then bharat? bharati are getting nuclear material only for civilian projects, not weapon building. Pakistan used to operate one plutonium producing nuclear reactor till 2008 now we have 3 more and working on fifth.

SLBM, its not deployed by bharat, again for us its connected to navel reactor, whenever we will build SSBN we will have them, right now we have Babur SLCM and i am not satisfied with its range of 450km.. we need SLBMs
 
.
North Korea is doing whatever to bring us on negotiating table at even terms US has to sit on table otherwise North Korea will test the might of USallies and even US if nuclear bomb of us in hershima is nightmare just imagine 50 ton hydrogen bomb what it will be
 
.
there isnt anything called turkee
Lo jee! inhone to puri ek zuban ko hi nakaar diya!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_languages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_language

Janaab, Mughal apnee biradari mein kya bolte the?
What was the language among the Mughal ruling class and Mughal royal families?

And tell me how many of Pakistani know that language?
You have as much connection to Muslim rulers as Converted Christians in Kerala to East India Company/British Empire.
 
.
Why do you need ICBMs? who do you want to invade on other continent?

navel reactor and submarine builded with complete Russian consultancy.. Pakistan have been reportedly working on the navel reactor..

Higher yield bombs? when did that happen, last i remember they tested in 40kt range same as Pakistan..

for what you need way more nuclear material then bharat? bharati are getting nuclear material only for civilian projects, not weapon building. Pakistan used to operate one plutonium producing nuclear reactor till 2008 now we have 3 more and working on fifth.

SLBM, its not deployed by bharat, again for us its connected to navel reactor, whenever we will build SSBN we will have them, right now we have Babur SLCM and i am not satisfied with its range of 450km.. we need SLBMs
Pakistan needs these for strategic reasons, to project power and for their 2nd strike capability..... Neither am I satisfied with the range of 450km hence I want to see way more range.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom