What's new

‘Do we not have any rights?’ Indian Muslims’ fear after Assam evictions

India should provide citizenship to any and all people from the Subcontinent who claim to be Indians. All this documentation and proofs is not the right approach. There are many Hindus who have been caught spying for Pakistan while many Muslims who have died fighting militants in Kashmir.
 
. .
India should provide citizenship to any and all people from the Subcontinent who claim to be Indians. All this documentation and proofs is not the right approach. There are many Hindus who have been caught spying for Pakistan while many Muslims who have died fighting militants in Kashmir.
Your view of India is a romantic and educated notion of India. Unfortunately for all of us living in this subcontinent, the core power brokers in India operate on a very different model. It is a model that is ethno-centric/caste centric, racial, religious, regional, lingual etc. India does not have great leaders, but hucksters, and small men with small ideas. As such we'll see conflict for the foreseeable future. This is likely to evolve into a state where eventually India will get balkanized. That is a foregone eventuality and though that might seem unlikely today, when that process starts it will be fast and furious. It is a shame that India instead of being the big brother of this region helping elevate everyone, decided to stay small-minded and parochial, and self-interested.

India's biggest foreign policy failure is not China, but its animus attitude towards Pakistanis that has morphed into a hatred of Muslims. This Frankenstein that India has created will eat India from the inside.
 
.
Your view of India is a romantic and educated notion of India. Unfortunately for all of us living in this subcontinent, the core power brokers in India operate on a very different model. It is a model that is ethno-centric/caste centric, racial, religious, regional, lingual etc. India does not have great leaders, but hucksters, and small men with small ideas. As such we'll see conflict for the foreseeable future. This is likely to evolve into a state where eventually India will get balkanized. That is a foregone eventuality and though that might seem unlikely today, when that process starts it will be fast and furious. It is a shame that India instead of being the big brother of this region helping elevate everyone, decided to stay small-minded and parochial, and self-interested.

India's biggest foreign policy failure is not China, but its animus attitude towards Pakistanis that has morphed into a hatred of Muslims. This Frankenstein that India has created will eat India from the inside.

I have hope for India and the subcontinent at large. The last thing we want to do is lose hope. There are many people who are sane but just remain silent while a small minority gets the headlines because they are loud.
 
.
‘Do we not have any rights?’ Indian Muslims’ fear after Assam evictions

BJP government accused of ‘divide-and-conquer policy’ as villagers are beaten and shot

A protester holds a placard reading ‘Stop killing of Muslims in Assam – Rise in rage against police brutality!’


Hannah Ellis-Petersen and Shaikh Azizur Rahman
Mon 18 Oct 2021 05.00 BST

Maynal Haque was holding a bamboo stick in his hand when the police shot him at point-blank range. All around him, the houses of the village he grew up in were being destroyed or set alight by police. As Haque fell to the ground, officers’ batons pounded on his body and a photographer, appointed by police to document the raid, ran over and began stamping hard on him, a scene caught in video footage. Once dead, Haque was rolled into a bulldozer and carried off by officers.


“He was with just a stick but they fired at his chest,” Haque’s wife, Mamataj Begum, said through tears. “They killed him in a brutal way. The sole breadwinner of our family is murdered by police. How shall we live without him?”



Haque, a 33-year-old father of three, lived in Dhalpur, a cluster of villages in the north-east Indian state of Assam, making a living growing vegetables on the fertile land beside the Brahmaputra river and selling them in the market. Like most residents in the villages, home to about 25,000 people, he was a Bengali Muslim – whose ancestry goes back to Bengal and who typically speak Bengali – and had lived his whole life in this community, established in the 1970s.

Most migrated to Dhalpur from other regions of Assam after their land was lost to erosion. Over five decades, the community cultivated the land to build their houses and grow rice and produce next to the riverbank.

But on the morning of 23 September, police descended to clear away the inhabitants of Dhalpur. According to the Assam state government, ruled by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata party (BJP) that also governs India, this Bengali Muslim community were “illegal encroachers” on government land and on adjacent land which belonged to an ancient Shiva temple.


Yet many believe that the violent eviction that followed, that killed both Haque and a 12-year-old boy, Sheikh Farid, as well as injuring dozens of others including police, was not simply about reclaiming public land. Residents, activists and scholars have alleged that it is part of a broader campaign in Assam to portray Bengali Muslims as foreigners unworthy of citizenship rights, who should go “back to Bangladesh” – despite most being born in India.

“These evictions in Dhalpur are part of the BJP’s drive to politicise and dismantle the citizenship rights of the Bengali Muslims in Assam, and this is a very dangerous path,” said Angana Chatterji, an anthropologist at University of California, Berkeley, who recently wrote a study on the alleged abuses in Assam.

“We see the chilling nationalist fervour that these evictions induce. It reiterates their violent divide-and-conquer policy: fracturing communities along religious fault lines to ultimately establish a Hindu majoritarian state.”

For decades, Assam has been afflicted by divisive fears that outsiders, mainly those from neighbouring Bengal and Bangladesh, are settling illegally. But tensions have worsened since the BJP came to power in the Assam state government in 2016, with Bengali Muslims finding themselves increasingly ostracised and demonised as the “outsiders” and “infiltrators”.

Bengali Muslims have suffered most from the National Register of Citizens (NRC), a citizenship survey carried out by the BJP government in 2019, on all residents of Assam to identify those deemed to be illegal immigrants. While over a million Bengali-origin Hindus and Muslims, many who had been born in Assam, found themselves left off the register, an amendment to the citizenship law by the BJP government means that Hindus not on the NRC will likely be able to apply for citizenship anyway, leaving Muslims facing statelessness, expulsion or detention.

Amit Shah

Amit Shah, the home minister, has spoken of making Assam ‘infiltrator-free’. Photograph: Arun Sankar/AFP/Getty Images
This year the BJPhas increased its rhetoric on driving “infiltrators” from Assam. At an election rally in Assam in January, the home minister, Amit Shah, the closest ally of the prime minister, Narendra Modi, said: “Do you want to make Assam infiltrator-free or not? … Only the BJP can do that.” Yogi Adityanath, a hardline Hindu monk and BJP chief minister of the state of Uttar Pradesh, also made speeches in March mentioning infiltrators in Assam. That month, the party released its manifesto in the state, pledging to take land back from “illegal infiltrators” and hand it back to the Assamese indigenous people. Assam’s BJP chief minister, Himanta Biswa Sarma, has repeatedly referred to Bengali Muslims in the state as Mughals, meaning the Muslim invaders of India.


Then in June, attention turned specifically to Dhalpur. During a visit to the area, Sarma declared that the land had been occupied by “illegal settlers”. Dhalpur, he announced, would be reclaimed for an agriculture project to benefit indigenous youth, as part of the BJP’s pledge to rescue “our land and the Assamese identity from encroachers and intruders”. These statements came despite around 80% of the residents of Dhalpur being on the recent national register of citizens, proving they were legal citizens of Assam.

Days later, the first Dhalpur eviction took place, uprooting 48 Bengali Muslim families and one Bengali Hindu family. Some 246 other families from the community presented a petition to the high court demanding protection from eviction. But on 18 September, more Dhalpur villagers were given notice they would have to leave the area, and two days later the mass eviction began, with 1,100 families forced to leave their homes.

But it was an eviction on 23 September in which the full force of the state came down on another 250 families, around 2,000 people, left in Dhalpur. Despite a case still pending in the courts, residents said police arrived on the night of 22 September and set fire to some of the houses as a warning.

The next day, according to witness accounts and video footage, more than 1,200 police officers descended, some with bulldozers, and began flattening the homes, mosques and madrassas in the village. “Policemen began demolishing and setting fire to some shanties, leaving the villagers very angry,” said Noor Hossain, a Dhalpur resident. “We also heard sounds of gunfire.”


Thousands of Dhalpur residents began to protest, with many refusing to comply with the evictions.

According to Haque’s brother, Ainuddin, Haque had picked up a stick and tried to chase the police away from his home. They responded by shooting him in the chest, killing him on the spot. In the resulting violence, dozens, including several police officers, were also injured and the 12-year-old boy, Shekh Farid, was killed.

NC Asthana, a social activist and retired senior police officer, said the eviction was in violation of standard police protocol, describing the actions as “unjust, unfair and above all unprofessional”.

Rupam Goswami, a senior BJP leader in Assam,denied there was any religious motivation behind the evictions in Assam. He said the police had only responded with force after “10,000 people” armed with “sticks and swords” had begun attacking the police violently in Dhalpur.

“Those who have been evicted were encroachers,” said Goswami. “They were occupying the land illegally. This is a fact. Many are saying that an issue of religion is involved in this eviction but this is not the case. Since BJP came to power in Assam in 2016, it has been trying to remove all encroachers in the state. Even Hindu encroachers have been evicted.”


The police did not respond to requests for comment. This week, the high court in Assam ordered the government to submit an affidavit about the evictions.

Some of the families driven out were given land to relocate to by the government, but it is prone to flooding. The government has also not provided them with any official resettlement documents, leaving them at risk of future eviction with no proof of their rights. Others have been given no land at all, and about 2,000 people have been left homeless.

The evictions are continuing. Last week, 500 more Bengali Muslim families remaining in Dhalpur and surrounding villages have been served notices. Meanwhile, contractors have begun work tilling the land where their neighbours once lived. To Dhalpur’s former inhabitants, it is a stark reminder of their precarious place in Assam’s society.

“We are Indian citizens like they are, yet they are evicting us from our land,” said Majed Ali, 58, another Dhalpur resident. “Do we not have any rights as citizens of India?”



nope….
 
.
Dont know why you keep parroting a falsehood. Majority did not stay. Majority of muslims lived in East and West Pakistan post partition. The combined populations of East and West Pakistan was larger than the number of muslims who stayed behind. Also in fairness to the muslims who stayed behind - they were living in the lullaby that the Congress had spun up of a pluralistic open Indian society. Jinnah understood the nature of the people and that is why he changed his stance from a single India to a partitioned India.

Even today I'll hear people speak of India having more Muslims than Pakistan. That changed sometime around late 80s early 90s and we haven't looked back. Finally who has more Muslims has nothing to do with the creation of the nation of Pakistan. As Pakistanis we want to live free of a tyrannical Hindu majority, with our own culture, tehzeeb, language and traditions. It is that simple. Even if that is 10 or 220 million. Pakistan's being is not a function of a majority vote of muslims. It is a function of those who are Pakistanis wanting to live as Pakistanis (and what that represents). That is the nationhood concept that most Indians and the West never understand. Which is why from day one they spoke about the temporary nature of Pakistan (Congress leaders believed Pakistan eventually would merge back), and fail to realize the strength of Pakistani nationhood and its resilience.
When I say majority ,I ment the majority Muslim population in India now.i don't care for jinna or nehru and what they said,both wanted to be head of a state .

Of course we too want Pakistan to live in peace , and I am sure you agree that it is not possible with always breaking up India in your mind.i am not saying you personally but in general.
 
. .
Only illegals have to worry about NRC and CAA. Otherwise what's the issue. Even when someone has to apply for passport of any country they have to prove citizenship.
If they are Bangladeshi send them back and get back the Biharis. If they are foreigners why isn't it issue between Bangladesh and India? Why is BJP calling them Mughal? What makes them think all Muslims were automatically friendly to Mughal rule. Mughal Hindustan actually achieved what BJP forever dreams of, 'Akhund Bharat' with 24% of world economy. It was not done by bigotry.
 
.
When I say majority ,I ment the majority Muslim population in India now.i don't care for jinna or nehru and what they said,both wanted to be head of a state .

Of course we too want Pakistan to live in peace , and I am sure you agree that it is not possible with always breaking up India in your mind.i am not saying you personally but in general.
I agree with you that peace is fleeting, which is a shame. But this impasse has to do with India not truly taking on a big brother role and doing everything from day one to add to Pakistanis legitimate paranoia. All Indian actions gave us the view that what Jinnah and others said was true. That India will never reconcile with the creation of Pakistan. So when you did what you did in the pogroms of Punjab, Hyderabad, Gunagadh, Kashmir - the dye was cast. Pakistan given its much smaller size was naturally going to become a Security State. The rest is history. Bangladesh being the icing on the cake as trust between the two nation was permanently ruptured. In creating this animus for Pakistanis within India, India was also sowing the seeds of its own demise. It allowed big nation politics to seep into the sub-continent, while spreading the fissures within her own society. This played itself out during the cold war, where India was a big beneficiary of the setup. It got full unbridled support from one party (USSR), while the other kept away or was generally friendly (USA). Pakistan was not so lucky, where it got the ire of one and limited love from the other.

In all this equation, all parties for whatever reason failed to understand that Pakistan is a real nation, with an ideology, with a structure, with a general desire of her people to remain a part of this nationhood. That our existence is not a function of opposing India, but a people's desire to live free of majority tyranny. Pakistan's resilience is not a function of its Army, but the promise of its vision and belief of its people in its destiny. No one outside of Pakistan can truly understand or appreciate this. Which is why you get the classic failed state moniker thrown around. That moniker speaks more of the intellectual dishonesty of people using it, that any academic rigor and objectiveness.

In terms of Pakistanis wanting to break India, honestly (and I come from a family of core Establishment people), this was never a strategy or part of a discourse throughout our history. For us the discussion was always about survival. Now however, things are changing. I think people in Pakistan are slowly beginning to realize that India is in a death embrace with our country. That India is and has been singularly driven by the desire to hurt/undo Pakistan. This is becoming more clear with each passing day and the Hinduvta group has done a great job coalescing Pakistanis, and waking them up from their Aman Ke Aasha bullshit. Now, one nation will survive and the other will not, and this time Pakistan will align with another nation (superpower) that too believes that the Indian British experiment needs to go back to its natural state of smaller regional states. And unfortunately small Indian minds and leaders have made this come to fruition. By calling Pakistan their enemy, they have made it up to be so, when it really did not need to be the case.
 
Last edited:
.
Perfect all the Muslims who want a separate country can move right in.

He he he, with their share of land of course...

We partitioned British India so we dont have to live with hindus. Now its indian muslims turn to partition india...
Once already done
He he he, that was British India my nigga. We are talking about india.
riYsat e pudina had been set up for those who have qualms about what's going on in India.
High on caw ka cola?
 
.
That boat has long sailed. All they have to jump the fence othrrside like they jumped this side or prove themselves to be in India before BD was created

Do all the jumping before seven sisters rolls out of Indian clutches.

Woh din aa gaya.

Low life cowards shooting unarmed people.
If they are Bangladeshi send them back and get back the Biharis. If they are foreigners why isn't it issue between Bangladesh and India? Why is BJP calling them Mughal? What makes them think all Muslims were automatically friendly to Mughal rule. Mughal Hindustan actually achieved what BJP forever dreams of, 'Akhund Bharat' with 24% of world economy. It was not done by bigotry.

The argument would be valid if the story about millions of Bangladeshis in India were true. Claiming Indian Muslims are "Bangladeshi' is an ultrafamiliar BJP trope and tactic to gather votes by convincing a gullible and ill-informed Hindu electorate. They have been beating the drum of "Muslims are evil" for a long, long time.

Lying ba$tards as usual.

There is no earthly reason why a person in a country that is richer (Bangladesh) would go to India. What the hell for?
 
Last edited:
. .
If this doesn't get you banned I swear. Post reported.
It is your platform, you have complete monopoly. I was once avid user of this but back then it atleast pretended to be neutral. Now it is run by you know.
Might is right. Only those with the ability to take thier rights by force are allowed to have them peacefully and unconditionally.

Universal truth.
Days of mob's might gone.
Undercurrent sentiments if will surface up it will sway away the might whichever you are referring to.
 
.
Might is right. Only those with the ability to take thier rights by force are allowed to have them peacefully and unconditionally.

Universal truth.
In countries where the constitution doesn't guarantee rights. If it does, it is of no value because the population is too divided or primitive.
 
.
The argument would be valid if the story about millions of Bangladeshis in India were true. Claiming Indian Muslims are "Bangladeshi' is an ultrafamiliar BJP trope and tactic to gather votes by convincing a gullible and ill-informed Hindu electorate. They have been beating the drum of "Muslims are evil" for a long, long time.

Lying ba$tards as usual.

There is no earthly reason why a person in a country that is richer (Bangladesh) would go to India. What the hell for?
I asked an Assami Muslim some years ago. He called them Bangladeshi, as well. He was not hateful about it.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom