Obviously my intention was not bean counting but to explain that there are reasons why so many Indian would have this attitude.
Point being similar reasons exist in Pakistan.
That is again taking the issue into another unrelated direction. Regretting the partition doesn't mean people want to undo it. Not after so long.
You can't control what people think irrespective of the way you may think and want others to think.
You may not call it partition, it is referred to as such by the whole world and in every history book across the world. There is a reason for that! And it is not disrespect.
It is the partition of British India, a colony, not some mythical, 'motherland'. Had the British not come and united the place, there would be multiple nations, large and small, ala Nepal, Bhutan etc. in South Asia now.
The earlier sectarian conflicts or some regional issues (Sindh, Balochistan) were entirely domestic AFAIK with little or no Indian support. You know it as well as I know.
Even now even you acknowledged the Mariott blasts were by a Pakistani terror organization. Blaming India seems little more than trying to do tit for tat. Even most Pakistani experts recognize them as being the results of wrong policies of the past coming back to haunt.
The sectarian attacks were separate form the bombings I am referencing, and India has been involved with the BLA. But as I said in my last post, you could argue India has little to do with these acts in Pakistan, and I can argue the same about Pakistani complicity in India.
The fact is that people in Pakistan blame India for the terrorism that occurs here.
You are refusing to see the obvious multiple distortions that have been pointed out in this thread by just pointing to a poll.
While the poll is a good source we can't ignore all else. We all can easily see how so many Pakistanis are not able to distinguish facts from fiction and so easily fall for the Jew/Hindu/Salibi conspiracy theories. These books prepare the ground for them.
If you were to read my past posts, I believe I stated several times that there were flaws in the curriculum, and that they should be rectified.
My argument has been, using multiple polls by multiple organizations (not one poll), to show that attitudes and opinions in Pakistan on terrorism, peace and India are largely moderate and similar to those in India.
This has nothing to do with the 'distortions' in the curriculum, it is an argument against the hypothesis that those distortions have affected public opinion and attitudes to a significant degree, relative to attitudes in India, in the aforementioned areas.
On that count the scientific polls I have mentioned validate my argument.
The propensity to blame India/Hindus is matched by the propensity in India to blame Pakistanis. The addition of the "Jews' into the equation is a Muslim phenomenon, not a solely Pakistani one, that has roots in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the historical tension between the faiths. The role of the US in this conflict, the Israeli attack on the Iraqi reactors and perceptions of how the US unilaterally sided with Israel, sanctioned Pakistan etc. all play into this dynamic.
The resulting opinion is a complex outcome of many different events, perceptions and influences. To attribute it to a few flaws in history textbooks, that a handful of students likely pay enough attention to actually soak in all this implied and devious 'between the lines' meanings, is misleading and incorrect.
