Hi, I have seen mods. and officials distorting member's opinion and continuously reverting to the myopic view of releasing Indian pilot, which was not the ONLY thing happened in the war.
Let's get the basics straight to avoid the confusions.
I have firm belief:
WAR IS NO SOLUTION. PEACE SHOULD BE LONG LASTING.
At the same time, I also believe:
Pakistan's political handling of situation and events which unfolded after India's declaration and act of war, had NO contribution in peace.
I'm also not in agreement of Peace Prize nomination filed by govt. of Pakistan, perhaps later with drawn.
People may hold difference of opinion, but they have no right to wrongly paint opponent's opinion, i claim it as an act of evil.
Again for the sake of correcting the record:
I believe; PoW should be treated as defined in Geneva conventions and must be reciprocated by the opposite side as well.
Treating PoW as VIP guests is something i don't agree to, for various reasons but mainly because, Pakistan have had PoW in past and they were as well treated according to Geneva regulations, so this new way clearly is seen as disrespectful to the past army officers who have fought wars with India, with much less resources. This aspect can be left open to be discussed later.
Hope above opening, would eliminate the possibility to blame and accuse member's opinions contrary to the facts, which unfortunately is a trait here, and i have proven it many a times and will continue to do so. Hope it's also clear.
Now starting with conveniently ignored FACTS of political mishandling:
Indian pilot was released in middle of war, without agreeing to cease fire.
AF was ordered not to hit any of Indian military's supply depots, Indian military personals, Indian military infrastructure, and later also not to sunk intruding Indian sub.
So guys let's continue to roll here.
Did some one ever wrongly translated your opinion?