Ha Ha Ha.....this explains everything.........
You don't want to hear what an Indian has to say regarding their own religion........
you dont wanna hear you opponents view in a debate......you just wanna enforce your own propaganda.
you are a perfect example of a PROPAGANDIST.
Actually you are beating the same drum again and again......look at the posts below......
You are intentionally and quite foolishly trying to suggest that Buddhism was confined in certain "pockets" of the Indian Subcontinent.
Tell me, if the Taxila University was situated in modern day Pakistan, then how come we find enormous status of Lord Buddha in modern day Afghanistan?.....according to your childish logic....Buddhism should have been confined to modern day Pakistan only.
The answer is.......
During the Pre-Islamic era, Buddhism flourished so much so that they had their own Universities where they taught about Buddhist Philosophies......
These universities were situated in modern day Pakistan and Bihar-India........These were the epicenters of Buddhism...people from all over the world came to study at these places......So, from where these Universities were situated, their influence reached far and wide.........
The presence of these Universities at the Western and central India along with their influence in eastern and southern India indicates that, BUDDHISM literally flourished throughout the Indian subcontinent....at that time.
AND given the fact that India was ruled by HINDU kings, it is extremely stupid to assume that, BUDDHISM flourished without the patronage of the Hindu kings......
