Sifar zero
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
- Messages
- 1,359
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
And they accuse us of hiding our casualties.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you even know what is Paramilitary? It means Central Armed Police Forces not Indian Army. CAPF was the one who was acting on frontlines fighting wuhan virus, Left Wing Extremism, NE and J&K insurgencies.What's new here, By conservative estimates, the following admission breaks down to over 100 casualties every month, when did the Indian army or Indian MOD ever disclosed such figures during this period.... they hide casualties until the water is under the bridge.
4,132 Paramilitary Personnel Died Between 2017 and 2019, MHA Informs Lok Sabha - News18
The highest number of personnel who died during their service period belonged to the CRPF (1,597), followed by 725 of the BSF, 671 of the CISF, 429 of the ITBP, 329 of the SSB and 381 of the Assam Rifles, Union Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai said.www.news18.com
We revealed all our casualties of Kargil War, read the article before posting it.Awwwwww https://zeenews.india.com/news/nati...would-affect-morale-of-troops-cic_839766.html
We are not like you Indians that don't recognise their fallen...
@Huffal this is the reason, RTI act has some rules, so if you ask stuff which is not permissible will be rejected even if it has been accepted and the details are made public, at the end RTI is first automated and then manually checked.Do you even know what is Paramilitary? It means Central Armed Police Forces not Indian Army. CAPF was the one who was acting on frontlines fighting wuhan virus, Left Wing Extremism, NE and J&K insurgencies.
We revealed all our casualties of Kargil War, read the article before posting it.
View attachment 766101
Yea, BSF is also part of it who were once protesting against Pakistani Army for killing BSF soldiers which is rather odd as soldiers are supposed to fight back not protest like labourers on strike.Do you even know what is Paramilitary? It means Central Armed Police Forces not Indian Army. CAPF was the one who was acting on frontlines fighting wuhan virus, Left Wing Extremism, NE and J&K insurgencies.
How’s it even related to Indian Army? Your ISPR didn’t even accept JF-17 crash at pindigheb.Yea, BSF is also part of it who were once protesting against Pakistani Army for killing BSF soldiers which is rather odd as soldiers are supposed to fight back not protest like labourers on strike.
View attachment 766103
And when did ISPR didn't accept the crash, does this has anything to do with the subject.How’s it even related to Indian Army? Your ISPR didn’t even accept JF-17 crash at pindigheb.
They already dumped dozens of soldiers deaths in road accidents in this month alone
And this is how the IAF and Indian MOD make a fool of Indians by putting up wreckage of Indian MiG-21 and do a clumsy job of painting in Pakistani colours but being dense forget to remove the serial number.How’s it even related to Indian Army? Your ISPR didn’t even accept JF-17 crash at pindigheb.
Don’t deviate from the topic by spamming offtopic posts, come to the actual point on casualty hiding. Why did ISPR hide JF-17 crash at pindigheb?And this is how the IAF and Indian MOD make a fool of Indians by putting up wreckage of Indian MiG-21 and do a clumsy job of painting in Pakistani colours but being dense forget to remove the serial number.
So they were protesting against their colleagues who got KIA, so? They are not even Army.And when did ISPR didn't accept the crash, does this has anything to do with the subject.
View attachment 766108
Jammu, Kashmir. 13th June, 2018. Members of India's Border Security Force (BSF) raise slogans against Pakistan after paying tribute to four of their colleagues killeearly Wednesday in Jammu, the winter capital of Kashmir, on June 13, 2018. Four security personnel belonging to India's Border Security Force (BSF) were killed, anat least three injured, in cross-border firing from Pakistan troops, confirmea senior BSF official on Wednesday morning. Credit: Stringer/Xinhua/Alamy Live News
Why are you Parroting same nonsense, you as an Indian know the place and the type of aircraft that crashed, but you claim that ISPR some how hid it, why would they need to hide it, it's not as it was lost through enemy action or something....now the denial on SU-30 is the real issue.Don’t deviate from the topic by spamming offtopic posts, come to the actual point on casualty hiding. Why did ISPR hide JF-17 crash at pindigheb?
You are being dense, BSF is part of the over 4000 casualties in the link i provided. How does it matters if they are not part of army, at the end of the day, they are deployed on the border.So they were protesting against their colleagues who got KIA, so? They are not even Army.
So why is disclosing casualties affecting the sovereignty and/or integrity of India, if they apparently accept all of their casualties?@Huffal this is the reason, RTI act has some rules, so if you ask stuff which is not permissible will be rejected even if it has been accepted and the details are made public, at the end RTI is first automated and then manually checked.
View attachment 766102
Seems a feku like most of the indiansI never said Pakistan hides it’s casualties, but in Kargil it once happened and their families never raised questions. So I don’t know much, there’s a guy on Twitter who posts screenshots of family members declaring that their son got martyred and “not accepted by Inter Services Public Relations”.
I am not anyone to comment on his credibility because I don’t know how he finds such things in FB (it’s like finding a pin in a haystack).
There are some provisions and rules under RTI. Right To Information has limited coverage in Armed Forces due to obvious reasons.So why is disclosing casualties affecting the sovereignty and/or integrity of India, if they apparently accept all of their casualties?
But my question still stands. Why is disclosing the casualties the Indian military had sustained in the kargil conflict affect the sovereignty or integrity of india when they have apparently announced their casualties right after the war?There are some provisions and rules under RTI. Right To Information has limited coverage in Armed Forces due to obvious reasons.
Don't mention hiding causalties to an Indian otherwise they will screech about kargil war without realising they hid their own casualties. They are still yet to announce them.