What's new

DG ISPR Welcomes New Indian Army Chief !

You are, very properly, being encountered by @Rusty. Attend to him.:lol:

If you don't believe, what I have posted; go to a good psychologist and get yourself psychoanalyzed, you would get the answer.:p:
Lol if you consider trolling as encountering. You yourself are a troll it seems. Happy trolling!
 
. .
New Indian Army chief should have a quiet word with Bippin on how the shock waves of Pakistani stand off weapons felt dropped nearby. There might be a need of wearing adult nappies when he is next in Indian occupied Kashmir.

This is the reason those Gangus wear those awkward helmet bowls.

When you talk to a dog you don't use proper English, you talk to them in a way they can understand.
My interactions with Indians online has taught me that this is the only way Indians ever understand things.
Trust me, When I used to treat Indian with respect, they would spit in my face. They way I treat you is my defense against you people spitting in my face.

Oh no, nit picking numbers... argument of a man who has clearly lost.

*Ahem*
I, Rusty, get on my knees and officially apologize for claiming 1.5 billion street shitters instead of 1.3.... the world would have been a much much worse place had there been 200,000 more street shitters then there actually are.

Happy?

And quote me! Find the quote where I said 40,000 FOUGHT a million!!!
You can't

You are also not educated enough to know the meaning of "Faced"
I will teach you.

Faced means something/someone who is your adversary.
It does not mean you fought each and every person/thing.

The 40,000 troops faced an Indian army that had millions of troops.
It did not fight millions, but had the 40,000 troops fought and won one battle, they would have to face the next and next and next as India could bring millions of troops to fight.

I really hope you understand what I am saying... but I fear it might be too high IQ for you.

You are really fixated on the "after ww2" bit.
Why?
Why does that matter at all?
Does it help you masturbate?

And what strategic leadership?
They were stranded!
You now expect us to be able to move countries around the map so they can be closer to us?
Trust me, if we could we would move as far away from rapistan as we could.

Once again, no country on earth had 2 large parts of it's nation on the other side of a hostile country that was many, many times larger then it.
There is no analogy on Earth that compares.
The troops in East Pakistan knew they could not win and chose to save lives over wasting them for nothing.
India should actually be grateful for this as Indian lives were saved too.... unfortunately some of those saved Indian lives undoubtedly gave birth to a few rapist...so for the sake of Indian women maybe we should have fought a little longer.... oh well :cheesy:

Why are you strategizing for Pakistan now?
What's done is done.
Pakistan did the best it could with the resources it had.
It was given a bad hand in 47 and India took advantage of it.
No shame in that.

Real shame comes form starting one sided panga with people who warn you to not start shit, then loosing aircraft after bragging about starting the panga.

World now knows Pakistani tea is fantastic so thank you I guess. :pakistan:

Sir, you are my hero.

Excellent response to these fascist Nazi wannabes
 
.
Are you retarded?
Seriously asking.

Let me spell it out for you.

about 40,000 troops in East Pakistan were cut off from the mainland by thousands of Km of hostile territory. No supplies, no back up, NOTHING
And they were up a against a multi million man army.

There is no shame in this defeat as no army on earth could have won in this situation.

Real humiliation comes when a broke country that is 7x smaller then you has to serve your pilot tea right after you talk about 56" chests and what not.

Oh and 71 happened almost 50 years ago.
What excuse do you have for served tea less then 1 year ago?
I shouldn't be the one teaching you military strategy. Neither should be India, but if I were you, I would start a war in the western front while my enemy is concentrated in the east. Retarded? Yeah, but not me. It'll be Niazi who thought he could win.

Why there was no supplies and no backup, we effectively destroyed your supply lines. Losers have all the excuses for how and why they lost.

On the contrary, what did you gain by serving tea? Anything at all?
 
.
I shouldn't be the one teaching you military strategy. Neither should be India, but if I were you, I would start a war in the western front while my enemy is concentrated in the east. Retarded? Yeah, but not me. It'll be Niazi who thought he could win.

Why there was no supplies and no backup, we effectively destroyed your supply lines. Losers have all the excuses for how and why they lost.

On the contrary, what did you gain by serving tea? Anything at all?

Yeah, looser do have excuses .. like 350 killed and clouds gave cover :rofl:

Listen, you stick to what you do best, raping, and let PA stick to what they do best, serving Indian POW pilots fantastic tea.

Niazi thought he could win?
Where? This isn't rapistaan where you can make up fairy tails to destroy mosques.

Once India invaded, Niazi knew he could not win. No army on Earth could have given that exact situation.

I don't want to engage low IQ people but seriously, look at a map.
East Pakistan was in revolt for months, west Pakistan was thousands of Km away with no way to get supplies to the East due to India.
You know you are retarded when your retarded questions can be answered by simply looking at a map.

The question should not be what Pakistan gained, the question should be what India lost.
India actually lost a shit ton of prestige.
They not only lost a plane in fair combat, but they KILLED THEIR OWN PEOPLE :rofl:
Pakistan let the world know it won't take shit and India let the world know it was actual shit.


Also, in your previous post you said Pakistan lost all influence in South Asia... funny... that must mean there are no obsessed Indians on PDF.
There are no obsessed Indians making fake news networks to defame Pakistan.
No Indian politician since 71 has ever mentioned Pakistan.....
Oh wait.....

So much obsession against a nation that has no influence.....:pakistan:
 
.
Yeah, looser do have excuses .. like 350 killed and clouds gave cover :rofl:

Listen, you stick to what you do best, raping, and let PA stick to what they do best, serving Indian POW pilots fantastic tea.

Niazi thought he could win?
Where? This isn't rapistaan where you can make up fairy tails to destroy mosques.

Once India invaded, Niazi knew he could not win. No army on Earth could have given that exact situation.

I don't want to engage low IQ people but seriously, look at a map.
East Pakistan was in revolt for months, west Pakistan was thousands of Km away with no way to get supplies to the East due to India.
You know you are retarded when your retarded questions can be answered by simply looking at a map.

The question should not be what Pakistan gained, the question should be what India lost.
India actually lost a shit ton of prestige.
They not only lost a plane in fair combat, but they KILLED THEIR OWN PEOPLE :rofl:
Pakistan let the world know it won't take shit and India let the world know it was actual shit.


Also, in your previous post you said Pakistan lost all influence in South Asia... funny... that must mean there are no obsessed Indians on PDF.
There are no obsessed Indians making fake news networks to defame Pakistan.
No Indian politician since 71 has ever mentioned Pakistan.....
Oh wait.....

So much obsession against a nation that has no influence.....:pakistan:
:blah:
Looks like I poked a raw nerve of this dude. :D
 
. . .
Umm..okay. So real humiliation is not when 90000 people surrender and returned back but when a pilot is captured and served tea and returned back. No wonder you said that million soldiers fought against 40000 in East Pakistan. You love to exaggerate don't you?
40,000 troops and 50,000 pro-Pakistani elements and volunteers and yes from a hostile land who's people were hostile against us . But I'd suggest that you start making plans and measuring things according to the results of 27th Feb and not the history . This ain't '71 .
 
.
We must appreciate that the forced occupation of Kashmir and the active participation in separation of East Pakistan, by India, are the psychological expressions of their hegemony and supremacy, which arises out of their perceived victimhood, humiliation and subjugation, starting with the occupation of Sindh by Muhammad bin Qasim, and more particularly, with the attacks of Sultan Mahmud Ghaznavi, which continued for almost about 600 years. They cannot escape from the psychological trauma of this whole period.
Sultan Mahmood Ghaznavi lived for 600 years bro ?
 
. .
Yes . As shown in Swift retort Op .
Stream it live. People need reminding from time to time
Slave right ?
Tomorrow's slaves are today's kings and emperors
Take that big eye thingy with you
The Eye shall witness the Balkanisation of India.
let me surprise u
to rehn de.

تکبر اللہ سبحان تعالیٰ کی چادر ھے
نہ کھینچ اسے اے ماٹی کے نادان پتلے

Uncle ye to apka ghamand hai ke old age equals wisdom n taqwa
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom