What's new

Devyani Khobragade case: India tightens screws, withdraws privileges for US consular officials

Oh please! US was, DA's office was fully aware about the case against Sangeeta's husband, they are not like some unsuspecting software firm, as per them, they 'evacuated' her husband from the clutches of the vindictive Indian judicial process, and also 'protected' Sangeeta from a non-bailable warrant in India. I requested you to read post no.30 for a reason, here is the link.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2526067/Decoding-Khobragade-controversy-How-row-maids-visa-sparked-scale-diplomatic-incident.html

Also, what would you say if this news turns out to be true?

Devyani Khobragade had full diplomatic immunity at the time of arrest - Indian Express

FIR is filed against a person but passport not docked. Whose fault is that? US? or Indian authorities?

Beyond that lets explore the moral fiber here - How many family members - say IM terrorists' family members are filed an FIR against for non-cooperation? None AFAIK. Doesn't it sound vindictive if the FIR was filed in this case alone? So what does it prove? Actually this reinforces the DA's claim.

Regarding this news - best guess - DOS/MEA are working overtime to find a way out. Otherwise it wouldn't take more than 10 days for this news to come out and MEA would have gone bonkers.

Whatever maybe the situation - it is sad she might escape. Neena Malhotra and now this lady. All crooks who misuse their positions and hide behind the diplomatic immunity.
 
. .
.
US must have known Devyani Khobragade had full immunity: Govt

NEW DELHI: With the US not showing any signs of dismissing visa fraud charges against diplomat Devyani Khobragade, the government continues to pile on pressure to extract more than what it described as just a reflection of regret from the Americans.

The government said on Tuesday that it may not have been possible for the US authorities to not know Khobragade's status as adviser to India's permanent mission to the UN when she was arrested on December 12.

As an adviser with UN accreditation till December 31, Khobragade was entitled to full immunity when arrested.

"This was not unknown to the host government in terms of information flow ... let's not blame the victim for the lack of information on the part of those who should have known," said foreign ministry spokesperson Syed Akbaruddin.

Not bothering to check her status with India, and going purely by her entitlements as a deputy consul-general, the US authorities not just arrested but also subjected her to a strip-search.

"This was not unknown to the host government in terms of information flow...let's not blame the victim for the lack of information on the part of those who should have known and (who were) preparing about this (arrest) for a long time," said foreign ministry spokesperson Syed Akbaruddin, adding there are mechanisms in the UN to periodically inform the host country about those accredited to various categories in the UN General Assembly.

"She was a diplomat, is a diplomat and will remain a diplomat," he added. He said Khobragade was never given a chance to explain if she had any additional entitlement which could have prevented her arrest.

The government said it was not willing to go by stray voices in the US about the outcome of the case and that it would wait to hear from the state department which has said it is looking into Khobragade's full immunity claim in her status as adviser to India's permanent mission to the UN.

After her arrest, Khobragade was transferred to the same mission as counsellor. While she has already received UN accreditation, an official acknowledgement is awaited from the US that will ensure full immunity for her. As per state department's own guidelines, this immunity will preclude any court jurisdiction over the diplomat. However, it also says that this won't be a perpetual benefit which would mean that she would have to face the same charges if she returned to the US in a private capacity. Khobragade's problems have been compounded by the fact that her husband is a US national, one of the reasons why she was posted in that country.

The government on Tuesday also said it was serious about pursuing the issue about the kind of compensation being offered to Indian employees of US Embassy and Consulates. The government is still to receive details of the pay scales of Indian employees. It has already formed a working group to collate and assess all such information from US diplomats.

US must have known Devyani Khobragade had full immunity: Govt - The Times of India
 
. .
As far as I can see, member here have misunderstood 3 major points

1.) the maid, as far as I understand, was hired by Devyani herself, not on the capacity of Indian government, hence the maid is "imported" to work for Devyani, US labor law, not Indian law must be fulfilled

2.) being a diplomat or consular staff does not mean you cannot be arrested. The diplomatic immunity only works on prosecution on said crime, not arresting for said crime

3.) If any concession were to make on arrest, it was due on the discretion of the officer.

I don't know what US do or not do, or what Indian did or not, the case is about the lying on the DS-160, it's the employer duty to verify the salary, the DOJ in this case have right to go after Devyani even if she is a diplomat

-CathyCathy
 
.
Back
Top Bottom