What's new

Demonetisation in India-News and updates

You are probably right on the last point, the privileged finding out about the poor overnight. None of them had any idea about this. Those of us engaged with skill development as an alternative to management training and engineering training were already aware of this; sensitive India, as distinct from privileged India, has been aware of this situation for some time now.

I can't agree with your statement about hungry people standing in lines. Hungry people looked for MNREGA funds, they never stood in line at banks. It is not clear why you think they did. There were never such ridiculous queues before this recent debacle.

I don't know why you think such ridiculous queues have never existed before. Ration queues in villages are very long.

Here's a list.
Some relevant to us, some not. Some necessary, some unnecessary.
http://www.indiatimes.com/culture/w...l-always-find-a-neverending-queue-244887.html

As for the drought being responsible for the quality of life deteriorating in India, that is very true. It is unfortunate that this is remembered only in order to contradict those who think that the quality of life deteriorated in the last few weeks. This problem existed, as you point out, for the last two years; it is sad that instead of concentrating on the plight of the poor, and those suffering due to drought, our Don Quixote and Sancho Panza combination decided that corruption and black money was a greater demon.

Corruption and black money are the biggest reasons why little development has taken place in India. The root cause of a number of problems in India.

Please read this post to get a slightly clearer view of the situation.
https://defence.pk/threads/india-ca...ween-islamabad-new-delhi.464863/#post-8978798

The poor in India should have been at least twice as rich as they are today had the previous NDA govt stayed in power.

If this recent idiocy has brought the media to talk about the misery of the poor, and especially the rural poor, that is not a bad thing, surely. Better than talking fatuous nonsense about Shining India, and better than taking pride in GDP growth, without considering what real impact that had on the bulk of India's population.

The real economy has been brought to light by demonetization. People have finally realized how fake growth has been. So what's wrong with that? Before this, it was all hidden by a veil, that you have conveniently ignored.

It's funny. People always want reform. But when we finally have someone capable of making revolutionary reforms, they are criticized for being too revolutionary. The fact is nothing bad will happen post demonetization. Once currency goes back into circulation, things will go back to normal, this 'inconvenience' people are facing is temporary.

And the 'inconvenience' is far lesser than it normally is during the drought years. During drought, the lines that go to ration shops are massive, the media simply chooses to ignore publishing that. Why the media chooses to ignore that? It's because they are under political pressure to not publicize such suffering.

So the 'inconvenience' that people are suffering, that's been pretty normal for them and has been normal for decades. Modi wants to change that.

I don't know in what sense 'other states' are doing fine. I don't know why Bengal came up in your comment in the first place. But no doubt there was some agenda behind it. No doubt, in the fullness of time, we will be informed what it is.

Bengal is worst affected by demonetization only because the underworld's taken a hit and the local govt is being unresponsive.

Other states are facing normal issues, basically a simple liquidity crunch and related problems.
 
. .
Not merely irresponsible, but also stupid. To trap the delinquent by forcing them to explain their wealth is all very well, to do so by harming nearly a hundred times more, and from the vulnerable sections of society is a betrayal of the responsibility of high office, as well as a demonstration of complete lack of intellect.

My personal observation, this is a supposedly "Surgical Strike" turned into "massacre". Unless there is a hidden agenda that Midi admin did not come upfront, as other posters suggested, it just doesn't seem to be a rational economic policy that affects a nation with 1.2 billion people. I can't imagine it happen in any other country where blind adulation for a politician doesn't exist.
 
.
Then you are among the privileged few. If you cannot see the disastrous consequences all around you, it is either deliberate or delusional. Further, it is not the monied and the prosperous, those who already lived in a plastic economy, who are worst affected; it is those who are among the most vulnerable.

The consequences of this megalomania will haunt us for decades.


The Govt probably did a elementary school grade analysis considering how long and troublesome the process could get.

I am sure they thought it out something like " People will bring in the old notes, and swap it with the new ones up to 4000 Rupees ", and also thought the banks would be supplied with enough cash to handle this
transition.

They were wrong in all count.

I will tell you how,

1) The employees of the bank may keep most of the new bills

a) for themselves
b) for friends and family

2) They may also give most of the cash to their high profile clients

3) I am sure politically powerful people got to exchange all their bills using the backdoor while the average guy was standing in line for days in front of the front door.
 
Last edited:
.
My personal observation, this is a supposedly "Surgical Strike" turned into "massacre". Unless there is a hidden agenda that Midi admin did not come upfront, as other posters suggested, it just doesn't seem to be a rational economic policy that affects a nation with 1.2 billion people. I can't imagine it happen in any other country where blind adulation for a politician doesn't exist.

The entire Indian industry has welcomed it.
 
.
http://www.countercurrents.org/2016/12/07/demonetisation-the-sultan-of-sophistry/
Demonetisation: The Sultan Of Sophistry
inIndia—bySatya Sagar—December 7, 2016
demonetisation9.jpg


It is early winter and a thick, grimy fog, black and white tinged with grey, hangs over Delhi much of the day. Morning visibility is bad, clears up a bit with a dull sun in the afternoon, before darkness descends again on the city.

A month after Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced his demonetisation policy, the gloomy weather in the national capital describes quite well the mood of the people here. Sullen but not angry, worried but not yet panicked, uneasy about the future but focused for the present on solving daily problems.

And yet somewhere deep down there is a growing feeling that we are witnessing the twilight of the Indian Republic – at least as we have known it for over six decades- a sovereign, federal, democratic nation, which with all its flaws, stumbles along intact. Few fully understand the real implications of 86% of the Indian currency disappearing overnight but there is foreboding it is a sign of many more drastic events to come.

If something as fundamental as money in a system can be so casually overturned what guarantee is there that you or your family will be safe tomorrow? Why should any of India’s various regions and states take orders from Delhi and its upstart Sultan of Sophistry anymore?

With every passing day though the disaster wrought on the economy and lives of ordinary citizens by demonetisation is becoming starkly apparent. Industries, trade, farming operations and daily consumption of essential goods are collapsing due to the lack of sufficient cash to carry out the simplest of transactions.

The queues at the banks are only getting longer and more frustrating with a surge in violent incidents as the initial support for the government’s self-proclaimed ‘war on black money’ wears thin. After all it is not the rich and powerful who are lining up day after day to exchange their old notes or try and withdraw a paltry 2000 Rupees from the few ATMs that work here and there.

In the meanwhile, the elderly and weak die in the wait like only they can, tired and breathless at the heartlessness of it all. How much more suffering is in store and how many needless lives lost to this manmade disaster – nobody really knows.

There is very little talk now from the government of any windfall gains to state revenues due to demonetisation, as almost all the ‘black cash’ around finds its way back into the banking system. There are zero measures to tackle the far larger problem of ‘black wealth’, in the form of gold, property, foreign accounts revealing the fundamentally dubious nature of this ‘war on corruption’.

A desperate regime aids this conversion withmarginally stiffer penalties on unaccounted money coming into the banks,making the current crusade just a continuation of previous voluntary disclosure schemes for tax evaders. Calculations made by respectable research institutions show the costs to the Indian economy of demonetisation will far exceed any benefits it brings.

The rhetoric has instead already turned to the cuckoo world of a ‘cashless economy’, where everyone will live happily tied to a digital grid, run by the government hand in glove with banks, payment gateways, e-commerce companies and other peddlers of seductive software. All you need is a secure identity, the Aadhar card, the number imprinted on which will open or close doors depending on your credit rating. (If Aadhaar cards get fabricated on a large scale- as they are perhaps already- the powers that be will insist on a special stamp with indelible ink on your forehead to certify you are allowed to exist on this planet!)

It would all be very laughable if not for the cruel implications in a country where a majority still struggle to eat, cannot read or write and survive on a daily basis without power or water. It is only a generation ago that the poor learnt to negotiate cash – itself a complicated concept- and here they are being told to abruptly go digital. It is as if the Earth opened up one morning and swallowed them wholesale.

Along with the poor the real target of demonetisation are thousands of small and medium businesses which thrive only on cash transactions and underpin Indian democracy itself through both their sheer diversity and ability to earn and live independent of state support. Once they are decimated it will be that much easier to establish total control over the Indian economy by a handful of large corporate monopolies, which will also facilitate political dictatorship.

Sure, informal enterprises avoid giving tax but then what exactly will the Indian state give them in return if they become compliant – good schools, infrastructure, quality health care, pensions? Why should anyone pay tax to a government that seems to use these revenues to fatten the bank accounts of politicians, bureaucrats and crony capitalists?

The educated, urbanclasses are the only ones cheering Modi on right now as they see in the digital economy a consolidation of their traditional power – after all feudalism was also a ‘cashless’ system – not even a signature was required to get things done. A mere wave of the hand was enough to get orders or even orderlies executed inRam Rajya. ‘E-Brahmanism’ would be indeed be a more appropriate way to describe a society without any physical cash!

Is it really possible to impose such a ‘Uniform Commercial Code’ on such a vast and heterogenous economy like India without sparking a revolt? Isn’t the Modi regime and the cabal of corporates playing with fire by pushing this ‘Big Bang’ reform?

When former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh described demonetisation as a ‘monumental management failure’ he was essentially warning Modi not to bite more than he can chew. He should know, having been the architect of the original ‘Big Bang’ of liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation over two decades ago. It was the tectonic forces he unleased on the Indian economy and society that gave impetus to Hindutva, helped the BJP rise to power and the phenomenon of Narendra Modi himself – all of which swallowed up the Congress party itself.

Of course there will be blowback and long after India recovers from the dire consequences of Narendra Modi’s monetary adventure, future historians will actually wonder what led a ruler, at the peak of his power, to attemptharakiriin this manner? For, it is not difficult really to see what has happened – the man is falling in front of our eyes on his own sword of hubris – the brash weapon that has humbled many a self-styled emperor before him.

Trying to understand the motives many have dubbed Narendra Modi a new Mohammad bin Tughlaq, the 14thCentury ruler of Delhi, whose kingdom collapsed due to foolish experiments with new and poorly minted currency. There is some truth to this of course, as grandiose visions that lack of attention to detail and hasty schemes marred by low quality of implementation have indeed been his hallmark so far.

His harsher critics have compared Modi to the notorious Mir Jafar, who due to greed and ambition shook hands with the wily East India Company only to lose both arm and country.

Modi, an ordinarypracharakwho rose to became Prime Minister, a chaiwallah who rubs shoulders with corporate bigwigs, does represent Mir Jafar’s burning quest for power at any cost.

The collective herding of 1.2 billion people into a ‘cashless economy’ is also nothing less than the return of Company Raj with loss of control over lives and livelihood for the Indian people. Mastercard, Visa, Facebook, Google, Paytm are the new Robert Clives of our times, manipulating intrigues in the Nawab’s palace to take over control.

There is even a Jagat Seth around, Mir Jafar’s financier, in the form of none other than Mukesh Ambani, whose business interests are poised to benefit most from the nature and timing of the demonetisation policy. Launching ‘Jio Money’, a payment gateway venture, in the first week of December, Ambani praised demonetisation in the same vein as a weapons dealer extolling the merits of war.

Coming back to Modi and theparallels with Tughlaq and Mir Jafar, they do indicate the way he thinks and behaves but do not fully capture what he is all about. In order to really get a more accurate picture of the man, there are two other essential ingredients that need to be added. One is the persona of a small town hustler of whom our Dear Leader has more than a heavy dose of and which is what lends him colour and explains his widespread popularity.

The dandy man in dark glasses, dressed in a white suit with flower sticking out his pocket, ambushing foreign Heads of State for a hug or posing like a tourist for selfies around ancient monuments – that is what endears him to the masses. All embellished by the legend that he is someone from humble origins who has made it big – something every poor man and woman admires and dreams of.

The other component of his character and one that makes him immensely dangerous though, is that ofamegalomaniac with the mind of a shrewd criminal. Nothing less that a wannabe Godfather. Someone, who is willing to do or say anything to get his way. With no loyalty to anyone except himself and his immediate benefactors – in the current case the corporate backers who financed his climb to power.

This makes him frightening to even those who helped him get where he has reached today – a man untethered to any principle, person or even the political party he leads. Remember Haren Pandya? The only consultation Modi seems to have done before embarking on the drastic experiment of ‘notebandi’ was perhaps in front of a mirror with himself – for it turns out none of the senior leaders of the BJP or even the RSS had a clue as to what he was upto- though all of them are lining up to praise his ‘brilliant’ policy out of fear today.

The reason why Modi is able to ride roughshod over his own party stalwarts is because he has cultivated a financial and popular support outside the traditional base of the organisation. If small and medium traders disappear with the digital economy, so be it – the future belongs to big corporations anyway. If the extreme Hindu right is upset with him how does it really matter when hecan win elections with the support of corporate financed propaganda?

Nothing else – but this understanding of Modi as a mix of Tughlaq, Mir Jafar, petty hustler and gangster –explains the indifference to consequences with which the entire demonetisation exercise was thought up and implemented. Nothing else explains also the arrogance that Modi continues to display about his own abilities as a ‘visionary’ and the complete lack of remorse for the immense hardships he has subjected the Indian population to.

What we have got from the Prime Minister so far in response to criticism or complaint is an anecdote about a beggar somewhere with a swipe card machine. Is this supposed to be the new aspirational model for the country – jobless citizens asking for doles in digital currency?

And of course, that casual ‘Robin Hood’ statement too, urging poorer citizens with Jan Dhan accounts not to return any of the unaccounted cash deposited in their names by those trying to convert their black money into white.

Wow! Did he really mean that? If he did, then good for him! I am just waiting for the day the masses figure out that all ‘white money’ in this country is only so because successive regimes have helped ‘whitewash’ it through convenient laws. When that finally happens – taking cue from Modi’s statement about redistributing wealth – there will not be a single Ambani or Adani shop left anywhere in the country!

It is clear, that even by the gross standards of the Indian elite’s historical disdain for the fate of the nation’s marginalized Narendra Modi’s entire discourse around the impact of his demonetisation policy is obscene beyond belief. In any other country, far less poor than India is, by now there would be class war raging– a French Revolution scenario complete with guillotines and heads rolling on the boulevard around India Gate.

That’s an exaggeration of course, but at least there would be mass protests around the nation calling for resignation of the Modi regime, the sacking of the RBI Governor, for restoration of the old Rs.500 notes and other measures that can relieve the immediate misery caused by demonetisation. Instead, so sorry is the state of our Opposition parties- except for the brave Mamata Banerjee- that instead of hitting the streets all they want is a statement from the Prime Minister in Parliament!

Given the reality that there is no organised opposition to the ruling dispensation outside, a more likely scenario is perhaps a palace coup against Modi from within. There is no doubt, while Modi is trying hide his wounds and bluster his way through the mess he has created, it is only a matter of time before, not just the Indian public, but also his own political party and fans turn on him viciously.

Leading this plot will be the Peshwas who run the RSS – unhappy with Modi getting too big for his boots and anxious to consolidate power before he fritters it away. In that case we may even see the rise of a new, more rigid and rabid version of Modi in the days ahead as his own partymen abandon him and move to the next level of their project to establishHindu Pad Padshahiin the country.

The sad truth of all this is that if you thought Modi was bad, there are even worse characters lurking in the shadows, just waiting to take over.

Caveat:Narendra Modi is only incidental to the snaring of the Indian Republic by the powerful forces of global finance. He happens to be the right man at the right moment to do their bidding. There is no doubt any future dispensation will come under similar pressure from outside to handover the keys or encrypted passwords to the kingdom’s treasury.

It will take much more than bogus ‘Hindu Nationalism’ of the RSS Peshwas to resist the temptation to sell Indian sovereignty and independence for a few shining sovereigns more. Maybe it is time for those interested in saving the Indian Republic to revisit 1857 for clues as to what needs to done next. No, I am not comparing Mamata Banerjee to the Rani of Jhansi or Kejriwal to Tatya Tope!
 
. .
Actually, I have done all that I needed to. My relevance is not confined to PDF; it never was. And it is you who thinks of desperation in this context, because your being in demand is an illusion in your own mind. If you were in such demand, you wouldn't have been haunting PDF, would you?

Yes, that sounds likely. Who would strive to find your acceptance, actually? Considering that you get kicked out on a regular basis, isn't that a little delusional?

Of course you love the mirror. Delusions about the self are well-known symptoms in a classic psychotic syndrome. Nothing very surprising.

You are keen to talk about yourself, which I do not find interesting.

Then you are keen to talk about me, for which I am not interested.

Where does that leave you ? Abusing me and calling names like a frustrated old man :lol:

BTW Do you recall the the time when you were accurately diagnosed as a Psychopath ? :disagree:
 
.
What a shallow rant. So ambani launched Jio money in dec. Really? This is like one of those zaid hamid analyses. Pick up a fact, attribute it far fetched motives and link it with what you have already concluded.

The number of articles pakistanis and chinis keep posting on a purely domestic indian administrative matter tells me much more.
 
.
NEW DELHI: With so little cash, you can’t even have a decent dinner, forget running regular diplomatic business, the Russian ambassador to India told New Delhi in a strongly worded letter as the country, a major global player and a key defence supplier for India, officially critiqued demonetisation-induced cash shortage for its diplomatic staff.

Diplomatic missions of Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Ethiopia and Sudan have also sent protest letters on cash withdrawal restrictions.

ET reported on December 3 ( Demonetisation Dollar Spat Between India, Pak ) that the Pakistan High Commission staff had refused to take salaries protesting new rules on withdrawing dollars.

Russian ambassador Alexander Kadakin, an old India hand, wrote to the ministry of external affairs (MEA) on December 2: “Please just imagine if we in Moscow mirror this order of SBI (State Bank of India) when 50,000 roubles will not be enough to pay for a decent dinner in a restaurant, not to mention functioning of such a big embassy as ours in New Delhi or India’s in Moscow.”

“SBI informed the Embassy that the cash withdrawal limit available to the Embassy is now Rs 50,000 per week under the government of India directives with no exceptions unless otherwise advised by the RBI,” he wrote. “Such an amount is totally inadequate as regards the embassy’s salary and operational expenditure requirements.”

Officials in the Russian embassy, who spoke off record, told ET that its New Delhi mission has a staff strength of 200 (excluding family members) and with the new withdrawal limit the cash at hand for one person comes to Rs 250 a week.

Kadakin in his letter urged MEA to intervene so that the withdrawal restrictions for diplomatic staff is lifted.

A senior diplomat in Delhi told ET that a number of missions have taken their case to MEA and many more may follow.

Some diplomats said Indian diplomats abroad may have to face similar restrictions if the situation does not improve.

They also said the restrictions may be against the spirit of the Vienna convention.

Kazakhstan celebrated its National Day recently amid “some difficulty” due to limits on cash withdrawal, diplomats told ET. Some other embassies are apprehensive that organising big diplomatic events may become problematic.

A task force of Ministry of External Affairs and finance ministry was set up after demonetisation was announced on November 8.

Some bank branches have been kept aside for transactions by diplomats so that mission staff can avoid long queues.

But foreign diplomats in India say there has to be a solution to the fundamental problem – ceiling on cash withdrawal.

Ministry of External Affairs has said it is working to find solution to the problem.



http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...dinner-russian-envoy/articleshow/55823340.cms
Is credit card new to them?

According to India itself, around 98% of transactions in India are done using cash. So it makes sense that they need cash for doing a lot of day-to-day things.
You need to understand this in details. High-level statistics does not help. Cash transactions are preferred for the following reasons.
1) Paying in black
2) Saving on service tax on the digital transaction. extra 2%.
3) No access to terminal on smaller shops.

Why will some affluent diplomate will have any of the above challenges? Is he going to roadside shop for Dinner?
 
.
Such a poorly informed author. It's obviously an anti-Modi rant.

Oh its much for than a Rant. Its a call to arms.

What does this tell you ? "Maybe it is time for those interested in saving the Indian Republic to revisit 1857 for clues as to what needs to done next."


Armed revolution to overthrow the "sultan" :lol:
 
.
Well yesterday my maid asked for payment..i told her i dont have cash..she told me to transfer 2500 in her account..lol ..
And people here say that its not going to help us :p
I was just thinking. Did you maid ever tell this to you? "No sir, I am not going to stand at the long queues, it's better cash than a bank transfer"?
The thing here is, even if she's got the patience to stand at the queues, what are the chances of her getting the money?
 
. .
https://www.project-syndicate.org/c...policy-consequences-by-shashi-tharoor-2016-12

India’s Demonetization Disaster
DEC 6, 2016
NE W DELHI – On November 8, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced that, at the stroke of midnight, some 14 trillion rupees worth of 500- and 1,000-rupee notes – 86% of all the currency in circulation – would no longer be legal tender. With that, India’s economy was plunged into chaos.

Modi’s stated goal was to make good on his campaign pledge to fight “black money”: the illicit proceeds – often held as cash – of tax evasion, crime, and corruption. He also hoped to render worthless the counterfeit notes reportedly printed by Pakistan to fuel terrorism against India. Nearly a month later, however, all the demonetization drive has achieved is severe economic disruption. Far from being a masterstroke, Modi’s decision seems to have been a miscalculation of epic proportions.


Climate Change in the Trumpocene Age
Bo Lidegaard argues that the US president-elect’s ability to derail global progress toward a green economy is more limited than many believe.

The announcement immediately triggered a mad scramble to unload the expiring banknotes. Though people have until the end of the year to deposit the notes in bank accounts, doing so in large quantities could expose them to high taxes and fines. So they rushed to gas pumps, to jewelry shops, and to creditors to repay loans. Long queues snaked in, out, and around banks, foreign-exchange counters, and ATMs – anywhere where people might exchange the soon-to-be-defunct notes.

But, upon getting to the front of the line, people were often met with strict withdrawal limits, because, in a display of shocking ineptitude, not enough new currency was printed prior to the announcement. Worse, the new notes’ design prevents them from fitting into existing ATMs, and their denomination – 2,000 rupees – is too high to be useful for most people, especially given that the government’s failure to print enough smaller-denomination notes means that few can make change.

India’s previously booming economy has now ground to a halt. All indicators – sales, traders’ incomes, production, and employment – are down. Former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh estimates that India’s GDP will shrink by 1-2% in the current fiscal year.

But, as is so often the case, the impact is not being felt equally by all. India’s wealthy, who are less reliant on cash and are more likely to hold credit cards, are relatively unaffected. The poor and the lower middle classes, however, rely on cash for their daily activities, and thus are the main victims of this supposedly “pro-poor” policy.

Small producers, lacking capital to stay afloat, are already shutting down. India’s huge number of daily wage workers can’t find employers with the cash to pay them. Local industries have suspended work for lack of money. The informal financial sector – which conducts 40% of India’s total lending, largely in rural areas – has all but collapsed.

India’s fishing industry, which depends on cash sales of freshly caught fish, is wrecked. Traders are losing perishable stocks. Farmers have been unloading produce below cost, because no one has the money to purchase it, and the winter crop could not be sown in time, because no one had cash for seeds.

Despite all of this, ordinary Indians have reacted with stoicism, seemingly willing to heed Modi’s call to be patient for 50 days, even though it could be much longer – anywhere between four months and a year – before the normal money supply is restored. The government’s assiduous public relations – which portrays people’s difficulties as a small sacrifice needed for the good of the country – seems to have done its job. “If our soldiers can stand for hours every day guarding our borders,” one popular social media meme asks, “why can’t we stand for a few hours in bank queues?”

But the sacrifice extends far beyond queues. Hospitals are turning away patients who have only old banknotes; families cannot buy food; and middle-class workers are unable to buy needed medicine. As many as 82 people have reportedly died in cash queues or related events. Furthermore, it seems likely that many of the short-term effects of the demonetization could persist – and intensify – in the longer term, with closed businesses unable to reopen. It could also cause lasting damage to India’s financial institutions, especially the Reserve Bank of India, whose reputation has already suffered.

Perhaps the worst part is that these sacrifices are not likely to achieve the government’s stated goal. Not all black money is in cash, and not all cash is black money. Those who held large quantities of black money seem to have found creative ways to launder it, rather than destroying it to avoid attracting the taxman’s attention, as the government expected. As a result, most of the black money believed to have been in circulation has now flooded into banks, depriving the government of its expected dividend.

On top of all of this, the government’s plan does nothing to control the source of black money. It will not be long before old habits – under-invoicing, fake purchase orders and bills, reporting of non-existent transactions, and blatant bribery – generates a new store of black money.

Many Modi supporters claim that the demonetization policy’s problems are a result of inept implementation. But the truth is that its design was fundamentally flawed. There was no “policy skeleton,” no cost-benefit analysis, and no evidence that alternative policy options were considered. Judging by the blizzard of policy tweaks since the announcement, it seems clear that no impact study was carried out.

Learn More
Yet, rather than recognize the mounting risks of the non-transparent policy environment he has created, Modi has been discussing going even further, moving India to an entirely “cashless society.” Does he not know that more than 90% of financial transactions in India are conducted in cash, or that over 90% of retail outlets lack so much as a card reader? Is he unaware that over 85% of workers are paid in cash, and that more than half of the population is unbanked?

Modi came to power in 2014 promising to boost growth, create jobs for India’s youthful population, and encourage investment. His poorly conceived demonetization has made a mockery of these objectives, while bruising his reputation as an efficient and competent manager. How long it will take for India to recover is anyone’s guess.
 
.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/analy...-disruption/story-N5dONPDPauS3ELh3IOLwIL.html

Demonetisation is not a short-term disruption
Roughly a month has passed since the Narendra Modi-led NDA government demonetised high value notes to flush out black money held in cash. Among other objectives, this move sought to weaken the political opposition ahead of elections in Uttar Pradesh and Punjab and bolster the ruling party’s chances in the national elections in 2019. But this process entails significant collateral damage to India’s economic growth. This is no short-term disruption holding out the promise of potential gain. The prospect is of the world’s fastest growing emerging economy faltering in its stride.

What is the likely impact on India’s output of goods and services or GDP growth? Economists often head where angels fear to tread to quantify the unquantifiable and put out a precise number that a 1-2 percentage points decline is likely due to demonetisation. In other words, if the economy has been expanding by 7.1%, the prospect is for it to slow down to 6.1% or worse to 5.1%. “Economists are talking nonsense on GDP decline”, thundered the MD of HDFC Bank!

Many economists, however, are sensible enough in stating that the data are not fully in to estimate the third quarter’s GDP growth or make an informed assessment.

Read:Govt didn’t have enough time to prepare for demonetisation: Piyush Goyal

India’s economic fundamentals, however, remain weak. The stock markets are tanking on adverse global and domestic cues. After registering a pace of 7.1% in April-June, growth in the nation’s GDP edged up marginally to 7.3% in July-September 2016. The shock to the cash economy is bound to be felt in the subsequent quarters as consumer spending is subdued and footfalls fade in shopping malls. Brick and mortar retail trade is seriously stressed. Trucks are idling. The farmers need to be paid for the crops that have been harvested. Cash is urgently needed for seeds and fertilisers for the next season.

As if all of this weren’t bad enough, investment of the private sector continues to be extremely sluggish. Spending on plant and machinery in GDP is in fact declining.

According to Pronab Sen, former chief statistician, the ongoing cash crunch has perhaps permanently damaged the informal sector that accounts for 45% of GDP and 80% of employment. With a sharp decline in manufacturing, North Block itself has suggested that overall growth in the September--December 2016 quarter will be lower by two percentage points to 5.5% from 7.3% in September-December 2015.

Read: SC defers hearing of pleas challenging demonetisation to Dec 9

If this scenario comes to pass, demonetisation would hit this year’s growth target of 7 to 7.75 % for starters. Economic growth in the January to March 2017 quarter would have to be much faster by 8.1% or 11.1% to attain that objective, both of which are most unlikely. There is no doubt a lot of uncertainty when the cash economy gets going again.

Printing an equivalent amount of notes that were taken out of circulation is likely to take at least six months or more even assuming the printing presses work to capacity. In this period, the shortage of cash casts a baleful shadow over the Indian economy’s growth.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom