What's new

Cynthia’s plea against Rehman Malik dismissed

Ivan

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
684
Reaction score
-6
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Malik Asad
Updated 06 Aug 2020
5f2b7b7a31d5d.jpg

Police report says Cynthia D. Ritchie had not produced any evidence to corroborate allegations of rape or harassment. — Facebook screengrab/File

ISLAMABAD: A local court on Wednesday dismissed a petition of US blogger Cynthia D. Ritchie seeking registration of a rape case against Senator Rehman Malik, after a police report termed the complaint baseless.


The police report stated that Ms Ritchie had neither produced any evidence to corroborate the allegation of rape in 2011 nor had she placed any material on record to show that she had been harassed.

Additional district and sessions judge Nasir Javed Rana heard Ms Ritchie’s petition. Her counsel, Imran Feroz Malik, argued that the police had refused to register an FIR against Mr Malik on her complaint.

In her application filed with the Secretariat police station on June 17, Ms Ritchie accused Mr Malik of raping her at his residence in 2011. She also stated that the former interior minister in connivance with former premier Yousuf Raza Gillani had employed the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) media cell to intimidate, threaten, harass and defame the US citizen on social media.

On her petition, the court had ordered the police to submit a report on the matter.

The police in response to the court order submitted the report stating that Ms Richie had not filed any complaint with the Secretariat Police Station regarding her rape allegations back in 2011. The police also maintained that no medical report had been attached with the application as evidence to prove that she had been assaulted. The report termed the stance of Ms Ritchie doubtful in the absence of substantial evidence and inadequate for registration of an FIR as the police found no truth in it.

Defamation case

Meanwhile, the same court also dismissed a petition filed by Senator Malik seeking registration of a defamation case against the blogger.

Through a defamation notice to the blogger, Mr Malik had demanded that Ms Ritchie pay Rs 500 million in damages, ‘promptly’ withdraw the allegation “in the same manner in which it was released and posted on social, print and electronic media” within 15 days of receiving the notice, as well as an “unqualified apology”.

The court dismissed the petition due to non-prosecution of the case.

Earlier, an additional district and sessions judge on a petition filed by PPP’s district president Raja Shakeel Abbasi had ordered the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) cybercrime wing to book Ms Ritchie for her alleged defamatory tweet against former prime minister of Pakistan and slain chairperson of the PPP Benazir Bhutto.
 
This is exactly how I had predicted everything
Will Mr. Malik sue her back?
OMG!
I had made this post for you and you were not here :D


View attachment 658074

Hahahahahaha I was missing you on PDF and when I searched for you, I came to know you are banned :D OMG LOL

Pta nahin apko kis juram ki saza mili hai, par main yeh dekh k bda hairan hua :P

Anyways, I wish you a Happy Eid! :cheers:

Will Mr. Malik sue her back?


Trust me I had predicted all this in a post. And I am trying to find it out so that I could quote it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom