What's new

Countering Chinese might - Indian way

Status
Not open for further replies.
Type 52 radars are not like Kolkatta class which can track anything and guide missile on target. HQ can not lock on target like MRSAM and destroy it. HQ series only has modest capability against planes and not good enough for sea skimming missiles.
Where is your proof?I did just show you a HQ9 intercept a sea skimming video,but somehow you said you can not see,and all aegis destroyer are using multi-layer defense,and you want to say something about that?
 
A very interesting article to read.
Some of the information was refreshing.
Anyways india is definitely moving in the right direction.
 
Read here about Brahmos and MRSAM combo in the words of an American analyst.

Explained – How The US Navy Can Shoot Down The Deadly BrahMos Missile


This is the third part of the series. We have covered introduction and detection of anti-ship missiles in general in the earlier articles. We strongly suggest you to read those 2 articles before proceeding with this as it will give you a better idea of what is explained here. In this article we will specifically deal with shooting down the famous Indo-Russian Anti Ship missile, the BrahMos. This missile has been chosen as it is currently the fastest and probably the deadliest anti-ship missile in service. The Russian variant of BrahMos is called Onyx and the export variant is called Yakhont. Its NATO reporting name is SS-N-26 Stallion. If you want to know how these missles work, i suggest you read my earlier article here
Do note that no classified information is revealed in this analysis and all the data used are publicly released figures. The analysis uses logic, physics and mathematics with the available data in order to present a general idea of how it will be to face BrahMos and measures to counter it.
The main advantages of BrahMos are
  • Mach 3 (2500-3000 km/hr) speed (which makes it very difficult to detect and track)
  • 300 kg Semi-Armor piercing warhead (which causes massive damage upon impact)
  • Very high kinetic energy on impact (which disintegrates smaller ships and cripples larger ones)
  • S-manoeuver just a few seconds before impact (which makes interception very difficult)
  • 300 km range in Hi-Lo altitude profile
  • 400+ km range in Hi-altitude profile
  • No wings (makes it harder to shoot down as winged missiles plunge into water after suffering wing damage)
The main disadvantages of BrahMos are
  • Only 120 km range when using Lo-altitude sea-skimming profile
  • Not intelligent ( can’t take evasive measures on its own to avoid interceptor missiles and follows predetermined path)

A Salvo of BrahMos © Saurav Chordia
There is a lot of rumor that the BrahMos is impossible to shoot down. This is mainly due to the fact that NATO missile defense systems were prepared to handle Mach 1-1.5 speed Anti-Ship missiles which Russia possessed during the Cold War. But after the Mach 2-3 speed Onyx/BrahMos was developed, it surprised the western world and it is unknown what specific measures have been taken to handle this supersonic threat. But the US Navy is well prepared to protect its fleet from such a threat. The stages involved in shooting down Onyx/BrahMos using modern anti-missile systems will be explained.

Burkes of the US Navy during a SAM firing exercise
Long Range SAM
The best part of using a long range SAM to defend a ship is that you can shoot the AShM launch platform itself (aircraft) before it can fire missiles at you! Since you eliminate the source of the threat, you ensure safety of the fleet. Long range SAM systems are those which fall in the 80-250 km category like SM-2, SM-6, Aster 30, HQ-9, SA-N-6 Grumble (Naval S300), 9M96E (Naval S400). But let’s consider the SAMs which are most likely to face the BrahMos.
The US Navy uses the SM-2 as its standard long range SAM on its destroyers. It has a range of 90+ km and uses a semi-active homing radar seeker which means that the mechanically scanning illuminators on board the warships should provide them with guidance. This proves to be a handicap as a Burke carries 3 centrally mounted SPG-62 illuminators which will find it difficult to deal with a multi directional missile attack. Normally, once the missile is detected at longer ranges if its following a high altitude profile, multiple SM-2 missiles are launched to counter the threat. 2-3 SAMs are fired against subsonic threats, so it is safe to assume that 4-5 SAMs will be fired at a single incoming BrahMos missile. Again, the SM-2 wasn’t designed to handle a missile flying at 3 times the speed of sound but designed to handle Soviet missiles flying at 1-1.5 times the speed of sound. So it’s going to be a very difficult task to shoot down BrahMos, as the attacking party will launch the BrahMos ideally 120 km away from the Burke to ensure a complete sea-skimming flight and to delay detection. The SM-6 is however is a different case and can intercept supersoonic missiles at sea-skimming altitudes and high altitudes as well. This will be a key weapon for the US Navy to defend its fleet against missiles like the BrahMos.
missile_wideweb__470x317,0.jpg

SM-2 being launched from the Mk41 VLS
Medium Range SAM
A Burke with its Octagonal SPY-1 radar visible
Let us consider a scenario in which a Burke class destroyer escorting a carrier battle group (CBG) is faced with a swarm of 8 BrahMos/Yakhont Anti-Ship missiles. Once the missiles are detected by the AWACS at 150+ km from the ship, the usual procedure would be to direct fighter jets from a nearby carrier towards the missile to shoot it down. But in this case, the missile is traveling at 3 times the speed of sound. Fighter jets will have 1/3 the time to react when compared to facing subsonic missiles. Hence the chances of a successful shoot down by fighters is less. But if we consider a solitary destroyer acting on its own, then the BrahMos will be detected at about 25-30 km from the ship. Considering a salvo of 8 BrahMos and that the missile travels at 1km/sec, the Burke has about 25-30 seconds to react. Launching long range missiles would be futile at this point because the missiles are closing in on the ship fast. The Medium range option available on the Burke is the 50 km range Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile (ESSM) which is quad packed and hence large quantities are available. This is very useful as one cell packs 4 MR-SAM compared to 1 LR-SAM. While intercepting supersonic anti-ship missiles, a large number of SAMs are fired to ensure successful interception. So in this case, we can consider about 16-24 ESSM ripple fired from the Burke towards the incoming missiles. We have 4 SAMs targeting each BrahMos missile and the probability of interception is ‘theoretically’ 100%. Practically, the BrahMos may break through these defenses.
image031.jpg

Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile (ESSM)
But there’s a big flaw in this if you haven’t noticed. Firing 24 ESSM takes 24 seconds, 4 ESSM target 1 BrahMos, so 24 of these can target 6 BrahMos and by that time the last few ESSM have been fired, there are still 2 BrahMos missiles left untargeted and speeding towards the Burke. So what’s the flaw? Think ……….If 16 BrahMos missiles (the capacity of new gen Russian frigates and Indian destroyers) were fired instead of 8, the defense of the Burke would be saturated if it’s operating alone. The Phalanx CIWS and Softkill countermeasures would probably manage to counter 2 more BrahMos, but then you have 6 remaining supersonic anti-ship missiles with 300 kg semi-armor piercing warheads ramming at full speed into a 9000 ton destroyer. Hence we can assume the saturation limit for a single Burke stands at 12 BrahMos missiles. So if it goes one on one with a Russian frigate or Indian destroyer carrying 16 BrahMos, it’s not returning home.
US_Navy_050525-N-0413R-187_The_nuclear_powered_aircraft_carrier_USS_Nimitz_(CVN_68)_lead_ships_assigned_to_the_Nimitz_Strike_Group_and_the_Japan_Maritime_Self_Defense_Force_(JMSDF)_in_formation_during_a_photo-ex_in_the_Pacific.jpg

US Navy Carrier Battle Group
So what did we learn from this? We learnt that if a ship possesses purely medium range SAM systems, its chances of survival are very low in a modern conflict. If it faces a missile like BrahMos, its chances reduced threefold. Hence many navies are opting for a layered defense system with AEW systems to protect their expensive warships. But there will be another doubt in your mind once you’ve read this. You’ll wonder how the AEGIS, which is the best in the world can’t deal with 20-30 missiles like BrahMos, and is the US Navy leaving its ships vulnerable to threats like these. The answer is yes and no. YES, The AEGIS is the best in the world because it can combine data from every ship and aircraft radar in the fleet ad draw a big picture of the surrounding airspace. It gets early data from E-2 aircraft which enables it to intercept missiles 100+ km from the fleet. And NO because even the worlds most advanced anti-missile system has a saturation limit. The exact value is not disclosed for obvious reasons, but considering a CBG will have 3 AEGIS equipped escorts in wartime, 48 fighters with 8 on Combat Air Patrol (CAP)and 2 E-2s will be airborne for providing Over The Horizon (OTH) radar coverage, the saturation limit for this CBG will be around 64 BrahMos missiles. The 300 km range of the BrahMos in mixed altitude flight and 120 km range in low altitude flight means that it cannot be fired from beyond the radar coverage of the CBG. Hence the deadliest delivery platform will be Russian Yasen subs which carry 32 Yakhont/BrahMos and can fire them while submerged. Now that we dealt with BrahMos against the famous AEGIS equipped Burke, let us see how other anti-missile systems fare against it.
kolkata-05.jpg

INS Kolkata carries 16 BrahMos and 32 Barak-8
There is one specific missile which has been designed from scratch to shoot down BrahMos. It’s the Indo-Israeli Barak-8 SAM. This missile was primarily developed by Israel to equip its warships to protect them from the Yakhont missiles which its neighbor was procuring. Israeli ships carried only short range SAMs and didn’t have modern radars capable of handling a dedicated attack by its enemies using Yakhont missiles. The answer to this problem was the extremely agile and accurate Barak-8 which packed the best available technology into a medium sized missile. Since it was developed with Indian assistance, I assume that India would have provided classified data about BrahMos so that Barak-8 can be made into the ultimate missile killer for the Indian and Israeli Navy. With a max range of 70 km, it operates in conjunction with the MF-STAR radar which can detect sea skimming missiles at 30-35 km range. It combined a medium range and short range missile into one missile, having a minimum engagement range of just 300 m and max of 70 km. There are claims that a single Barak-8 can stop a BrahMos as close as 500 m from a ship. One of the reasons behind the claims is that the Barak-8 is very accurate and has an active homing radar seeker, 8which enables the ship to technically forget about the missile after its launch and the missile finds the target on its own although the ship does provide guidance and mid-course updates. Since the Barak-8 can have a continuous lock on the incoming missile with its own radar and the MF-STAR can guide 24 Barak-8 missiles to 12 targets simultaneously, the saturation limit for a Kolkata class destroyer against the BrahMos stands at 12 missiles. This however is a contradiction in itself as the Kolkata class carries the BrahMos as well as the Barak-8. This means that the Indian Navy deploys the poison and the antidote on the same platform.
From the above analysis, don’t jump to the conclusion that the Kolkata class is equal to the Burke in missile defense role. Since the Kolkata carries just 32 Barak-8 and Burke carries 96 SAMs which can be increased to 192+ by quadpacking ESSM, the Burke equals Kolkata in the saturation missile defense role against BrahMos only. The superior load of the Burke allows it to withstand sustained missile attacks with its massive missile load. The Burke has advantages and can shoot down missiles at 200 km range when paired with AEW assets, but the Kolkata cant. In this analysis, both are considered equal as we are dealing solely with the BrahMos missile against solitary warships.
Short Range (Point Defense) SAM
If you are in a situation where you have to use a short range SAM to shoot down an anti-ship missile, then you’re already in deep trouble. It means that the hostile incoming missile has managed to evade the umbrella of defense provided by longer range SAMs. Hence they form the last line of defense. The target ship has around 5-10 seconds to react if it’s a supersonic AShM and around 20-30 seconds to react if it’s a subsonic AShM because the range of these SAMs is in the 10-15 km category. A volley of 8-12 point defense SAMs are usually fired in order to shoot down 2-3 incoming AShMs. Since the AShMs are very close to the ship, there’s no second chance available to defend itself and so the target ship fires as many missiles as possible to defend itself in this do or die situation. The popular SR-SAM systems are RAM, Barak-1, Crotale, Gauntlet (Naval Tor) etc.
Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM)
So how does a ship defend itself against BrahMos using short range SAM systems? If these systems are part of a layered defense system, then they have to deal with only 1 or 2 missiles as the remaining BrahMos would have been neutralized by the longer ranged systems. This is a relatively simple task for systems like the Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM) or Barak-1 which are designed to kill sea skimming supersonic missiles. But even these can’t handle more then 2-3 BrahMos on their own as they have a range of 10 km which gives them just a few seconds to react ad only a few missiles can be fired in that time.
So if you’re on a warship which has only a short range SAM system for defense, and more than 2 BrahMos missiles are fired at you, your future is bleak. Your only hope is to close your eyes and accept the inevitable.
Anti-Missile Guns
Guns are extremely popular in modern day air defense systems due to their quick reaction times and the ability to shoot down targets at very short ranges. Most modern navies use Close in Weapon Systems (CIWS) which consists of a high rate of fire gun acting on its own or combined with short range SAM systems. Currently, the US Navy deploys Phalanx CIWS on all its destroyers. It is a closed loop system, with the search-tracking radar and the 20 mm Gatling gun and ammunition combined into a self-sustained system. It has a max range of 3 km and an effective range of 1.5 km when dealing with low flying cruise missiles. If it faces a single BrahMos which has bypassed other missile defense layers, the radar of the Phalanx locks on to the BrahMos and unleashes a torrent of 20 mm depleted uranium projectiles which should shred the BrahMos easily. But, that’s not going to happen. The Phalanx fires at 3000 rounds per minute which translates into 50 rounds per second. Since the BrahMos flies at 1 km per sec and the effective range of Phalanx is 1.5 km, it has just 1.5 seconds to shoot down the BrahMos when the BrahMos is 1.5 km away from the ship. And since BrahMos is travelling so fast, if you shoot it less than 500 km away from you ship, its fragments will still strike your ship at high speeds and cause damage. So BrahMos has to be engaged between 500 m and 1.5 km by the Phalanx. This gives it a total firing time of 1 second. And since it needs half a second to reach full rate of fire, only around 40 rounds can be fired in that time.
Phalanx CIWS
It doesn’t end here, BrahMos performs an S-manoeuver in its final few km of flight. This makes it extremely difficult for Phalanx to get a lock on BrahMos. It will have less than 2 seconds to lock on to a maneuvering target flying at 3 times the speed of sound. It is practically impossible for the Phalanx to shoot down BrahMos. Hence the US navy is replacing it with RAM on its bigger warships as it triples the range and gives a better chance of survival for a warship. But there is no RAM on Burkes and they have a single Phalanx only. The older variants have 2, but it’s not like it makes much of a difference. Phalanx is useful against subsonic targets and supersonic ones travelling at Mach 1-1.5. Against BrahMos, it’s useless.
The US Navy is working on a solution to this already. The answer is in their Laser CIWS system which has been operationally deployed recently. It is currently capable of shooting down slow aerial and surface targets, but with improvements, by the next decade, a laser CIWS would be widely deployed and would be capable of swatting multiple BrahMos missiles like flies. But then again, a hypersonic version of BrahMos is under development which will enter service in the next decade. Flying at Mach 5-7, it could prove to be a headache for lasers as well. But we’ll know that 10 years from now.
Laws-01.jpg

US Navy Ship board Laser Weapon
CONCLUSION
The BrahMos is not an invincible missile. It is just a bigger headache for the ones at the receiving end of it.
The BrahMos is not an invincible missile. It is just a bigger headache for the ones at the receiving end of it. With a decent SAM system, you may be able to defend your ship against attacks by subsonic missiles. But to defend yourself from the BrahMos, you need an expensive, high-end, layered missile defense system. If you have powerful and networked Air Defense systems like the US Navy and the Royal Navy, you have a chance of survival. But smaller navies using basic air defense systems don’t stand a chance. Their only hope is prayer. So if you’re a warship captain, it’s always safer to be on the side which has BrahMos/Yakhont than to be on the side which has to face the BrahMos. By your bad luck if you end up facing the BrahMos, prayer is another option.

Explained – How The US Navy Can Shoot Down The Deadly BrahMos Missile | Defencyclopedia

Source: https://defence.pk/threads/how-to-defend-brahmos-american-analysis.354356/#ixzz4QSGaoDVh
 
Who is talking of defeating china? where in article is it clamed that India will defeat china. However, with 1/3 rd of defense budget and a very tiny space budget, we have scorred on you in many areas be it defense or space or nuclear energy as stated in article.

You spend too much money on buying things from others even with the fact you don't really have much money. You scorn on us? Hilarious, China makes bounds and strikes in almost all fronts, all inclusive, India is nothing, please pick someone your own size to compare, comparing India with China is a huge insult to us.
 
A country with GDP only a fraction of China's claiming defeating China, can anything be more hilarious than that? You are just not in the same league.

Military buildup is all about Money. China's economy will be on par with US in a decade and military might will naturally come with it.
chinese growth rate is falling and yuan is quietly revalued against $ now , 10 % recently in past 5 months and that too quietly . the GDP of Bharat will correct now for one or 2 quarters , but after that will shoot up like a rocket ( GST and recent demonetisation ) . and in another 5 - 8 years will match chinese numbers viz a viz GDP ( although very few in this world believe and trust chinese numbers ) . this is not prediction , these will be aftermath of what is happening in my country right now . you have few more years for chest thumping on forums and xinhua news agency , but reality will be different ultimately . bye for now
 
ese growth rate is falling and yuan is quietly revalued against $ now , 10 % recently in past 5 months and that too quietly . the GDP of Bharat will correct now for one or 2 quarters , but after that will shoot up like a rocket ( GST and recent demonetisation ) . and in another 5 - 8 years will match chinese numbers viz a viz GDP ( although very few in this world believe and trust chinese numbers ) . this is not prediction , these will be aftermath of what is happening in my country right now . you have few more years for ch
India is nothing looks like what China was 5-8 years ago, if you want to be like today's China in 5 years, what you need to do is in 5 years to become the world's manufacturing superpower and make everything in this world made in India. building the world's best highways, highs speed railways, ports ,airports , bridges , dams ,subways. Build up your universities and hospitals and in 5 years to build up world class cities like Beijing, Shanghai , Hong Kong, Guangzhou , Shenzhen....and so so many very developed second and third tier cities, have your own space stations and super computers and become the major producer and consumer in almost everything in this world. seems like India has a lot of things to do in 5 years. Good Luck.
 
China with their hyper nationalism adopted the way of beg, borrow and steal strategy to rise in the field of science and technology. They were very successful also but their success did not go well with international community as whole world see china as imperial power and an unwanted rise of a nation not god for world order and peace. There are two major emerging powers in the world today. India and china. China with their dictatorial regime collected huge amount of fund and they thought that they can not only surpass india but US also by spending heavily in strategic areas and soon world shall start recognizing them as the competitor of US and subsequently the sole super power of the world. However, Democratic india has her own way to take on china.

Now tomorrow Vijay bhatkar gave a lecture in which he once again mentioned of this 138+ exaflpo super super computer of India. One Indian guy explained how it was made possible by designing different architect of flexible buses rather than fixed buses. This is the frugal India way of innovation. Many things appear to be impossible may be made possible with innovation. India is exactly doing this. When I read this,, many such frugal innovations struck my mind which I want to discuss here in brief.


When whole world was contemplating mars mission just not for exploring Mars but also to project their power, ability and excellence in space science and technology. Many nations tried and got mixed result of success and failure.. They used costly heavy rockets. China used Russian rocket to their mars mission and failed. India too tried but India had a modest rocket of just 1.5 ton capacity. India conceived a unique frugal mission to mars using gravity of earth and reached Mars in its first attempt. Mission which a planned life of 6 months is now been extended for indefinite period.

China started building heavy rockets to establish their superiority in space. India worked on minimizing the launch cost and currently it is just half of any other agency worldwide. As china worked on increased capacity of vehicles, India focused on reusability of their space vehicle. India is working on one stage vehicle for launch and scramjet technology so that cost of launching may be bought down to just 10% of current cost. India also carried multiple orbit launch in one mission and 20 satellites launch in one mission. Now they target 83 satellites launch in one mission. India is working on reusable space shuttle to minimize the cost. ISRO with its tiny budget compared to Chinese space agency or NASA is placed in a very respectable position now. It is because of frugal engineering and innovations of Indians. India beat china with Innovation.

In the area of defense, while china was focusing on the increasing the range of her missiles, India focused on low weight and accuracy. The focus of India was such that they should be able to target enemy positions with conventional warheads. This requires a phenomenal accuracy. Today Indian long range missiles are such accurate that they can be used to target enemy position with single digit accuracy. Indian K4 missile is said to have almost zero error. When china’s SLBM JL2 is said to have 7700 KM range with 700 KG pay load, India’s K4 deliver 2 tons at 4000 KM with almost Zero error. This gave India a power to demolish enemy infrastructure with conventional warhead without using a nuclear bomb. This is a big strategic advantage.

Similarly, India worked on Brhmos missile to make them highly accurate and made them to dive steeply on the target. This made them deadliest of missile which can identify and target enemy position in hidden area behind mountains. This is an Indian innovation which made it possible to use the missile in non-traditional areas where the missiles cannot be use. This also made it deadliest of anti-ship missile virtually impossible to intercept with any present missile defense system existing in the world. When India declared that they will position this on India china border in Arunachala Pradesh, China rightly got annoyed and said that it is more than the security needs of India.

To protect the ships, India took same approach. India with Israel made MR SAM missile. This missile protect indian ships from Hundred KM to half of a KM. China on its Type 52D uses multi layer defense system of long range, medium range missiles but still they are unable to offer the protection which MRSAM provides. All Chinese systems put to gather are not as effective against sea skimming missile as single MRSAM. This is the power of Indian innovation and frugal engineering. .

In nuclear energy when whole world was focusing on making high speed centrifuge to purify uranium to weapon grade or reactor grade, India focused on research of game changing fast breeder technology where the high purity of fuel is not required. You can use relatively less pure fuel and still can achieve a very high burn ratio. The beauty of this technology is that it may generate more fuel than it consume. . Today india can transform her huge thorium reserve into fuel with this technology. India also designed a highly safe passive safety system for her nuclear power plant which will work automatically in the condition of accident to curtail damage. India made maintenance of Rajasthan atomic power station with same frugal engineering by making bamboo semi-automatic robots and made the plant operational once again at a fraction of cost (Less than 5%) which Canada had offered to do maintenance. Today that plant is generating electricity at a cost less than a rupee per unit.

China not only has her hegemonic design in strategic area but also social and political area. India and only india is capable of countering china all these areas. I will discuss about countering china in other areas on some other day.

Who wrote this nonsense? :enjoy:
 
Whoever it is will drown in their own piss
Indian whenever beaten in all ways and no way to surpass their competitor in next 20 years will come out with 10000 excuses to claim why they couldn't do it.

Bragging something like India ballistic missile has better accuracy is just another lame excuse to cover their ballistic missile poor payload and poor range compare to China one. If China DF-21D can even hit a moving carrier and not to mention warship. The accuracy is unrivaled.
 
Whoever it is will drown in their own piss
Your butthurt proves that it is not nonsense. Article has correctly explained the smart moves of India to checkmate China in South China sea and in Tibet.

A genius with out of chart Iq. :D They are invincible.
Hey loosed why are you abusing us?can you prove any content of article wrong?

I say let our Indian friends live by and in their wet dreams. :lol:
I think you have surrendered. You are not in a position to troll like what you always do. Article has correctly nailed you.
 
Indian whenever beaten in all ways and no way to surpass their competitor in next 20 years will come out with 10000 excuses to claim why they couldn't do it.

Bragging something like India ballistic missile has better accuracy is just another lame excuse to cover their ballistic missile poor payload and poor range compare to China one. If China DF-21D can even hit a moving carrier and not to mention warship. The accuracy is unrivaled.
So jl 20's. 700 k g payload is great and k4" s 2000 kg payload is poor? Do you have any missile which can carry 2000kg? You guys simply reduce payload to quote high range. Our capability is under stated. It is not me who say this. Your scientists say that agni 5 has 8000 to 9000 k m range. Our brahmos has 600 km range but we stated just 290. Agni 3 has a range of 5000 km+ but we quoted just 3500 k m. A4 has a range of 4800 km but we quoted just 4000km. So who is bragging and exaggeratig here?
 
India is backward in everything, a few years back both Indian army chief and air force chief admitted that Indian military is no match for China and suddenly now we have an Indian here claims that India is a military equal, this guy should replace Indian army chiefs who don't brag as well.

Simple common sense is that if you don't have a solid industrial and manufacturing base, sufficient funds , well trained tech savvy skilled work force, you will never have a sound and sustainable defense industry. You just can't buy your country into a military power without knowing how to mass produce weapons by yourselves. Economy is everything, money talks everywhere, before you can make your country on par with China in economy, you can never be an equal before us. Common sense is you should think more about how to develop your dirt poor country instead of claiming stuff which can not be verified even by common sense.

In a real battle scenario, quality and quantity are equally important , China has the world's biggest active missile program. India will be swarmed by Chinese missiles if a war breaks out . India just doesn't have a decent defense industry to support a full scale war and keep up the loss it might suffer from a war, India can be easily overwhelmed in a real war scenario, that's so obvious and all can see that.

China Has World’s Most Active Missile Programs, U.S. Says
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...world-s-most-active-missile-programs-u-s-says
 
China with their hyper nationalism adopted the way of beg, borrow and steal strategy to rise in the field of science and technology. They were very successful also but their success did not go well with international community as whole world see china as imperial power and an unwanted rise of a nation not god for world order and peace. There are two major emerging powers in the world today. India and china. China with their dictatorial regime collected huge amount of fund and they thought that they can not only surpass india but US also by spending heavily in strategic areas and soon world shall start recognizing them as the competitor of US and subsequently the sole super power of the world. However, Democratic india has her own way to take on china.

Now tomorrow Vijay bhatkar gave a lecture in which he once again mentioned of this 138+ exaflpo super super computer of India. One Indian guy explained how it was made possible by designing different architect of flexible buses rather than fixed buses. This is the frugal India way of innovation. Many things appear to be impossible may be made possible with innovation. India is exactly doing this. When I read this,, many such frugal innovations struck my mind which I want to discuss here in brief.


When whole world was contemplating mars mission just not for exploring Mars but also to project their power, ability and excellence in space science and technology. Many nations tried and got mixed result of success and failure.. They used costly heavy rockets. China used Russian rocket to their mars mission and failed. India too tried but India had a modest rocket of just 1.5 ton capacity. India conceived a unique frugal mission to mars using gravity of earth and reached Mars in its first attempt. Mission which a planned life of 6 months is now been extended for indefinite period.

China started building heavy rockets to establish their superiority in space. India worked on minimizing the launch cost and currently it is just half of any other agency worldwide. As china worked on increased capacity of vehicles, India focused on reusability of their space vehicle. India is working on one stage vehicle for launch and scramjet technology so that cost of launching may be bought down to just 10% of current cost. India also carried multiple orbit launch in one mission and 20 satellites launch in one mission. Now they target 83 satellites launch in one mission. India is working on reusable space shuttle to minimize the cost. ISRO with its tiny budget compared to Chinese space agency or NASA is placed in a very respectable position now. It is because of frugal engineering and innovations of Indians. India beat china with Innovation.

In the area of defense, while china was focusing on the increasing the range of her missiles, India focused on low weight and accuracy. The focus of India was such that they should be able to target enemy positions with conventional warheads. This requires a phenomenal accuracy. Today Indian long range missiles are such accurate that they can be used to target enemy position with single digit accuracy. Indian K4 missile is said to have almost zero error. When china’s SLBM JL2 is said to have 7700 KM range with 700 KG pay load, India’s K4 deliver 2 tons at 4000 KM with almost Zero error. This gave India a power to demolish enemy infrastructure with conventional warhead without using a nuclear bomb. This is a big strategic advantage.

Similarly, India worked on Brhmos missile to make them highly accurate and made them to dive steeply on the target. This made them deadliest of missile which can identify and target enemy position in hidden area behind mountains. This is an Indian innovation which made it possible to use the missile in non-traditional areas where the missiles cannot be use. This also made it deadliest of anti-ship missile virtually impossible to intercept with any present missile defense system existing in the world. When India declared that they will position this on India china border in Arunachala Pradesh, China rightly got annoyed and said that it is more than the security needs of India.

To protect the ships, India took same approach. India with Israel made MR SAM missile. This missile protect indian ships from Hundred KM to half of a KM. China on its Type 52D uses multi layer defense system of long range, medium range missiles but still they are unable to offer the protection which MRSAM provides. All Chinese systems put to gather are not as effective against sea skimming missile as single MRSAM. This is the power of Indian innovation and frugal engineering. .

In nuclear energy when whole world was focusing on making high speed centrifuge to purify uranium to weapon grade or reactor grade, India focused on research of game changing fast breeder technology where the high purity of fuel is not required. You can use relatively less pure fuel and still can achieve a very high burn ratio. The beauty of this technology is that it may generate more fuel than it consume. . Today india can transform her huge thorium reserve into fuel with this technology. India also designed a highly safe passive safety system for her nuclear power plant which will work automatically in the condition of accident to curtail damage. India made maintenance of Rajasthan atomic power station with same frugal engineering by making bamboo semi-automatic robots and made the plant operational once again at a fraction of cost (Less than 5%) which Canada had offered to do maintenance. Today that plant is generating electricity at a cost less than a rupee per unit.

China not only has her hegemonic design in strategic area but also social and political area. India and only india is capable of countering china all these areas. I will discuss about countering china in other areas on some other day.
Total bullshit, a loud mouth nation good only at boasting
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom