Looks like the agreement that reached between the U.S and Iran made you hallucinated chill out drink some water my friend trust me I'm in no way ready to loose you any soon stay tuned bro to see the outcome of this agreement and the war in Iraq and to see my dream coming true.
If you are talking about the House of Saud then I don't care. If you want misery to reach the Holy Land, your Arab brothers and sisters and your neighbor, including millions of fellow Shia Arabs in KSA then I must tell you that we are no friends.
I do not care about Iran at all other than the meddling of their Mullah's in a few Arab countries.
Rest assured that Iran will never surpass the GCC in economy or influence. Not in this century. Let alone the entire Arab world. NEVER. It's laughable to suggest otherwise.
Also understand that one day the Arab world will unite politically when the current parasitic leaderships are gone. Including certain religious figures. The will of the people can only be kept down for so long. The history of Europe proves this. Today the most civilized area on the planet.
Iraq is my second country and a prosperous Iraq is something that I myself look forward to and have said again and again but this will NOT happen under an Iraq ruled by Wilayat al-Faqih. I can assure you of that.
The Arab youth (the non-sectarian one) is sick and tired of the troublemakers.
You can sit behind your computer screen somewhere in Texas or where you live in the US but you, I and everyone else knows that Arabs stick together like water in all foreign countries regardless of sect. Same story in the US and you know what? I know this because I myself have witnessed it.
Let me make this clear for you. An Sunni Muslim Arab that supports the evil plans of the Mullahs in Iran in regards to Arabs is not my friend while a anti-Wilayat al-Faqih Shia Arab (even the most religious one) is.
I am completely calm but you are a hypocrite. You cry about Daesh maniacs but yet you take pride in the murder of innocent Muslim people and the Grandsons of Prophet Muhammad (saws) who never killed anyone. They had their faults like any other rulers but they were good, educated and decent people who lay the cornerstones of modern Iraq whether you like it or not.
But that's what's wrong with this world, Muslims and Arabs in the year of 2015 (Christian calendar). Absolute clowns are cheering for the killing of civilians Yemeni Zaydi's because Houthi' cult happen to be Zaydi's (nominally) and other absolute clowns are cheering for the killings of civilian Iraqi Arabs in Ramadi, Fallujah, Mosul, Baghdad, Tikrit etc. because Daesh claims to belong to their sect.
If the people do not change Allah (swt) will continue to punish the region with misery.
You should be ashamed of yourself and not use the avatar of Ali ibn Abi Talib (ra) because your views have nothing to do with his noble values.
Even as a non-Muslim what you are writing is nonsense.
I end it here and let your silly hatred eat you up.
And quite frankly I have no problems against non-anti-Arab Iranians either. Let alone a civilized Iran. At most they are a rival other than that nothing else. No more a rival than anyone else in the neighborhood.
People who hate Arabs (my people) for simply being Arabs cannot be my friends. Nor should they be accepted by any sane Arab. Simple as that.
Wrong the majority of the projects in modern Iraq was build first by the monarchy they build the the first stone and qassim completed it
The only mistake of the monarchists is following the British policy and feudalism which made the people hate them since the majority of iraqis back than were farmers
The political life and freedom was much better each party could partisbate in the parliament
The same goes to Syria before the Baathists toke over Syria
@Saif al-Arab @Full Moon
I love farming myself and have great respect for farmers (my little rant was due to Malik supporting murder of innocent Muslims and people which I did not expect of him and grandsons of Prophet Muhammad (saws) ) but the feudal system was not something the Hashemites invented. It had existed for centuries upon centuries if not millennium before. Feudalism exists to this day just under different forms. Most politicians in Iraq and anywhere else in the Arab world are highly corrupt and evil creatures while the common man suffers to a great deal especially in Iraq. Homeless and impoverished kids are in abundance in Southern Iraq and Iraq as a whole and many Arab countries. It is a tragedy.
Iraq would have been much better today if ruled by a constitutional monarchy like under the Hashemites. The late Faisal II (who was killed as 23 year old shortly before his wedding) might still had been alive. I am 100% sure that Iraq would have been much better off.
Fake so-called Arab "nationalism (Ba'athism), failed socialism and totalitarianism won. The people lost. This made the monarchies themselves more totalitarian due to the political climate.
Everyone in the ME 60-70 years ago was not well to-do in generally. Iraq was no exception but Iraq under the Hashemites was still much better than many neighbors and that is largely due to clever leadership.
Was there poverty? Of course to a large degree but that's still the case today 60 years later and billions upon billions of dollars earned from oil and gas revenue later.
Also the monarchy was actually to a large degree influenced/ruled by the military. The same military that eventually became their death. The excuse of not enough "reforms" must be blamed on the military who wanted status quo. Not a 23 year old man.
I know that the educated elite and old generation of Iraq (informed one) has respect for Iraq's monarchy despite not being a perfect system (which system is perfect)?
Also there was no discrimination against Shia's. That's a myth. The reason why many Sunni's had leading positions in government and military was simply because Iraqi Sunni Arabs were historically always richer than Iraqi Shia Arabs who lived mostly in the South. Baghdad was a majority Sunni city back then. That sociopolitical reality dated back to the Ottoman administration. Had Iraq been controlled by the Shia Safavids it would have been the exact opposite.
I can tell you that Shia's always were protected under the Hashemite rule in Hijaz and it was no different in Iraq. There were no restrictions on Shias under the monarchy but so-called democratic "socialists" who later came to rule Iraq (no names mentioned) discriminated.
In short unqualified peasants became kings overnight across the Arab world (Qassim, Saddam, Al-Assad, Nasser, Abdullah Saleh etc. etc.) and look how that ended for their respective countries?
Either establish full secularism and make talented qualified leaders rule or have competent monarchs instead of unqualified peasants becoming kings (dictators) overnight. Or evil Mullah's/Sheikhs using people as sheep.
