conspiracy theorist

[Roybot]

Is this what PDF is about now? Some lunatic posting some outrageous conspiracy theories? I have been reporting his threads for past few days, no action whatsoever.

I thought the policy was to post news and issues from a reliable authentic source?

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/156705-arms-india.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/156540-raws-trafficking-indian-children-israel-used-food.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/156241-india-must-resume-testing-nuclear-warheads-immediately.html

 

[KS]

 

[venu309]

Is this what PDF is about now? Some lunatic posting some outrageous conspiracy theories? I have been reporting his threads for past few days, no action whatsoever.

I thought the policy was to post news and issues from a reliable authentic source?

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/156705-arms-india.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/156540-raws-trafficking-indian-children-israel-used-food.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/156241-india-must-resume-testing-nuclear-warheads-immediately.html

When the subject is India, then usually the benefit of doubt goes to the opposition & it is disadvantage India....but of'course it is us who chose to be on PDF, so we should not complain...

 

[AbhimanyuShrivastav]

Is this what PDF is about now? Some lunatic posting some outrageous conspiracy theories? I have been reporting his threads for past few days, no action whatsoever.

I thought the policy was to post news and issues from a reliable authentic source?

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/156705-arms-india.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/156540-raws-trafficking-indian-children-israel-used-food.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/156241-india-must-resume-testing-nuclear-warheads-immediately.html

Yes.. .. relax..

 

[Donatello]

Is he posting offense comments? Is he being racist?

I mean, if he is not breaking the rules, then how can any action taken against the poster?


I could call you 'Lunatic'.......

 

[Roybot]

Is he posting offense comments? Is he being racist?

I mean, if he is not breaking the rules, then how can any action taken against the poster?


I could call you 'Lunatic'.......

Is calling Mahatma Gandhi a homosexual offensive enough for you?

 

[LetsGetRowdy]

Is calling Mahatma Gandhi a homosexual offensive enough for you?

i thought indians were not against homosexuals, but in fact embraced it because westerners say it is ok? so what if gandi was a homosexual?

 

[cheekybird]

Ive seen alot of conspiracy theories here...when talking abt 9/11 people talking abt it being an inside job bcom CT(conspiracy theorist)when people talking abt israel killing innocent people in palestine ...they bcom CT......if people talk abt US invading iraq was wrong bcoz they were no WMD in iraq ..they bcom CT...n da list goes on n on

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Satish Chandra's Assistant is probably the most sensible Indian on this entire forum, or even in the world.

 

[cheekybird]

Satish Chandra's Assistant is probably the most sensible Indian on this entire forum, or even in the world.

Ok..if im not wrong now this IS trolling

 

[Roybot]

i thought indians were not against homosexuals, but in fact embraced it because westerners say it is ok? so what if gandi was a homosexual?

I wouldn't have an issue if he was. Its the bs and slandering I have issue with.

 

[Shabz Nist]

This forum is clearly biased. I had no illusions about it even when I logged into the forum for the first time. All their fancy forum rules are not applicable when it comes to Indians or India. Clearly, there is a huge butthurt at work here.......please remember that our job here is to defuse propaganda....nothing more.

We have no obligation to this forum, nor any incentive to contribute to meaningful discussions......except maybe, shut down propaganda.

Regards,

 

[Gold1010]

deleted.

/////////////

 

[livingdead]

I dont even click on any thread created by him.
He is in the forum because technically he does not break any rules I think.

 

[BelligerentPacifist]

...
I thought the policy was to post news and issues from a reliable authentic source?
...

That can't be policy. Or any news from the BBC or the TOI or The News etc etc would have to be excluded!

I feel that since you can't argue with him, and he admittedly does sound outrageous, you're just rallying people to have him banned. Apparently that's what democracy has taught people in the world's largest democracy!

Use the logic you ask us to use: change the channel.