Consider total ban on beef across nation in 3 months, HP HC tells Centre

[vsdoc]

pictures or it didn't happen.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Agreed.

 

[Bombermanx1]

Oh I thoroughly enjoy it. The further the Hindu faith is ridiculed, the better. Instead of bringing the nation, if the hate is channeled against Hinduism, half the battle will have been won.

Precisely,This is how Modi won,He built a house from all the bricks thrown at him.
I remember Lord Krishna do the same with Sishupala,he ignored his abuses 100 times until his karma was ripe.Let them show more hate, isn't that what they say,how Christianity was able to convert the haters ?
The process might be fast and long for some people.Social Media shows a picture,it's overwhelmingly dominated by Hindutva and many new converts joining the ranks everyday.

 

[jamahir]

...

empty post... or are you pointing to your profile-pic??

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Hindutva fanatics however want it because they consider it a win over Muslims.

This is your assumption. And a wrong one.

 

[jamahir]

below is my post from another thread and i would say it cleanly answers to the thread topic...

muslims in india need to first get back to true/progressive islam, getting back from the clutches of the mullahs that have sadly taken hold here in the last 15 years or so... they should look at real heroes like nasser and gaddafi as ideals rather than fools like zakir naik and taliban.

giving up beef won't make indian muslims any less muslim... i support beef ban if it brings peace.

i as indian muslim have two simple demands...

1. ban of interest-based economics, which is not only congruent to true islam but also will help india reverse from having the most ridiculous and anti-human economic system in the world.

2. ban on dogs on the street... this will not only help prevents the thousands of brutal dog attacks on humans every year but will be congruent to my belief as a muslim-born in respect for the cat.

 

[JOEY TRIBIANI]

You mean you will try a insurgency in a nation with Third strike Nuclear capability and armed to its teeth,where the Armed forces are Third largest in the world?Sure please try that.

We did it with "United states of Soviet Russia" now its only " Russia" .

It was major power at it's time while u are just a third world country with a fanatic government . we just need to spark the flame baqi jitni nafratain wahan hain wohi kafi hain .

 

[rubyjackass]

No one is asking anyone to worship the cow. However if one religion ask its practitioner to PROTECT THE COW and another religion challenges their faith and guideline and does the opposite, that is stirring up trouble.

I read somewhere that killing a cow is a sin(There is considerable debate on what point in history this rule came by). It nowhere says don't allow anyone else kill a cow or kill anyone who kills a cow. That is me talking your language.

If you come out of the bubble, you have a belief keep it to yourself, don't enforce it on others. If you want to argue that Hindus are supposed to die protecting cows, let's just say I am already tired laughing.

You either provide legal cover to the cow or people will have no option but take law into their own hands to practice their faith.

Yeah sure, for Taliban there is no option. Forgive me for this line but, if anyone takes law into their own hands, the law will take them into its hands.

You inability to grasp such fundamental realities is what makes you a bigot.

Again, just lookup a dictionary for bigotry. Live and let live. That nowhere meets the dictionary of bigotry.

yes, you can pass comments on other people's reasons. Only it reflects your ignorance, bigotry, intolerance and spite. Expect to be called out for it. Morality and Ethics dictate it.

Thanks for changing your words from your previous post. What you have said so far has nothing to do with morality or ethics. Morality and ethics have nothing to do with beef debate.

 

[JOEY TRIBIANI]

You mean you will try a insurgency in a nation with Third strike Nuclear capability and armed to its teeth,where the Armed forces are Third largest in the world?Sure please try that.

Third largest armed forces . lmao .

 

[jamahir]

We did it with "United states of Soviet Russia" now its only " Russia" .

and such fantashtic result that brought to pakistan in coming years as also to afghanistan.

besides, what you claimed is a impossibility.

and before you go all sentimental about that fake-jihad of the fake-muslims of qaeda and taliban, read this ( rajiv gandhi saw pakistan as buffer against ussr ), a dose of actual politics at top level.

my intervention here is not to support sarthak but to tell right from wrong to people who may see your ill-written post... hope you take it in the right spirit.

 

[Bombermanx1]

We did it with "United states of Soviet Russia" now its only " Russia" .

It was major power at it's time while u are just a third world country with a fanatic government . we just need to spark the flame baqi jitni nafratain wahan hain wohi kafi hain .

You had nato/West on your side when you went after USSR,Whom do you have now?China? They are afraid to take aggressive stances against their South China sea Nations. Yet we broke you at that time into two in 1971 ,even when you had the backing of Whole NATO and China.The ones whom you claim who did it for you in Afghanistan are against you now.You curse Afghanisthan Daily.

 

[jamahir]

You had nato/West on your side when you went after USSR,

you too, you read that thread i linked above... nato was on india's side too... or rather, it is the opposite... been since 1950 at least.

 

[Bombermanx1]

Third largest armed forces . lmao .

Any doubt? We have the third largest standing army.

 

[45'22']

Third largest armed forces . lmao .

India has the third largest armed forces after US and China
Brush up some facts b4 commenting

We did it with "United states of Soviet Russia" now its only " Russia" .

It was major power at it's time while u are just a third world country with a fanatic government . we just need to spark the flame baqi jitni nafratain wahan hain wohi kafi hain .

USSR stands for
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics not United States of Soviet Russia

 

[Bombermanx1]

you too, you read that thread i linked above... nato was on india's side too... or rather, it is the opposite... been since 1950 at least.

Of course i know Nato wanted to embrace Bharat,USSR held Nehru and his lineage hostage of the fact Subash Chandra Bose was Imprisoned in Siberia in a Gulag and that was exploited by Soviets to spread Communism here.
Wait for January 26/2016 when SCB files will be declassified as said by PM Modi., Congress and Communists will be exposed then.