I'm surprised this topic has never been discussed! But anyways.
This sort of has a connection with the Asian Union Theory.
Basically the Clash of Civilization theory, is that people's cultural and religious identities will be the primary source of conflict in the post-Cold War world according to Samuel P Huntington.
Do you Agree or Disagree?
A map of civilizations, based on Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations". Western (dark blue), Latin (purple), Japanese (bright red), Sinic (dark red), Hindu (orange), Islamic (green), Orthodox (medium-light blue), African (Brown), Buddhist (yellow). Other colors should indicate (light green, turquoise) the cultural fault lines where the clash of civilizations will occur. Note on the Eastern European level; Transylvania (from Romania), Western Ukraine, northern Serbia and others are in the "Western world" according to the original work of Huntington.
I copied this stuff from wikipedia with slight modifications.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Relating with Asian Union Theory, a Asian Union will not be like "EU", but and Asian Union would be more like the Islamic civilization, Chinese civilization, Indian civilization, and Buddhist civilization and Russia working together against the West.
The Latin American civilization, African civilization, Japanese civilization, and other civilizations are "swing" civilizations siding with whoever suits their interests best.
This is what could happen if Asian Union Theory is practiced.
Since Asian Union Theory is not practiced, instead it is Indian civilization, Russia, and Latin American civilization that are the swing civilizations.
What are your views?
This sort of has a connection with the Asian Union Theory.
Basically the Clash of Civilization theory, is that people's cultural and religious identities will be the primary source of conflict in the post-Cold War world according to Samuel P Huntington.
Do you Agree or Disagree?
A map of civilizations, based on Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations". Western (dark blue), Latin (purple), Japanese (bright red), Sinic (dark red), Hindu (orange), Islamic (green), Orthodox (medium-light blue), African (Brown), Buddhist (yellow). Other colors should indicate (light green, turquoise) the cultural fault lines where the clash of civilizations will occur. Note on the Eastern European level; Transylvania (from Romania), Western Ukraine, northern Serbia and others are in the "Western world" according to the original work of Huntington.
I copied this stuff from wikipedia with slight modifications.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Relating with Asian Union Theory, a Asian Union will not be like "EU", but and Asian Union would be more like the Islamic civilization, Chinese civilization, Indian civilization, and Buddhist civilization and Russia working together against the West.
The Latin American civilization, African civilization, Japanese civilization, and other civilizations are "swing" civilizations siding with whoever suits their interests best.
This is what could happen if Asian Union Theory is practiced.
Since Asian Union Theory is not practiced, instead it is Indian civilization, Russia, and Latin American civilization that are the swing civilizations.
What are your views?