Clash at Tibetan monastery in China could turn 'explosive', Dalai Lama says

[Huan]

How about China grab back South Tibet (Arunachal Pradesh)? That would be explosive, but for the right cause. Less and less area for separatists to harbor in.

A good bonus would be for China to take over the Dalai Lama's current home in India. India should not harbor that separatist leader.

 

[tanlixiang28776]

How about China grab back South Tibet (Arunachal Pradesh)? That would be explosive, but for the right cause. Less and less area for separatists to harbor in.

A good bonus would be for China to take over the Dalai Lama's current home in India. India should not harbor that separatist leader.

How about no.

 

[Roybot]

How about China grab back South Tibet (Arunachal Pradesh)? That would be explosive, but for the right cause. Less and less area for separatists to harbor in.

A good bonus would be for China to take over the Dalai Lama's current home in India. India should not harbor that separatist leader.

Shows how much you know about Arunachal Pradesh and the Dalai Lama. I mean how hard is to read up on an issue before making a post?

 

[|| |\| ||)) || /\\ |\|]

How about China grab back South Tibet (Arunachal Pradesh)? That would be explosive, but for the right cause. Less and less area for separatists to harbor in.

A good bonus would be for China to take over the Dalai Lama's current home in India. India should not harbor that separatist leader.

LOL what's stopping you? You can't do much sitting on your computer in America.

 

[Jackdaws]

How about China grab back South Tibet (Arunachal Pradesh)? That would be explosive, but for the right cause. Less and less area for separatists to harbor in.

A good bonus would be for China to take over the Dalai Lama's current home in India. India should not harbor that separatist leader.

The Chinese are incapable of any land grabbing from India - but if the communist regime in Peking would do well to leave Tibet - a country which it has illegally occupied.

 

[Vassnti]

Went out the door when they tried a armed insurrection with the support of the CIA last time.

Could you provide data proving A: It was Buddhist monks armed and attacking the Chinese military rather than local thugs/militants
B: They were funded by the CIA please?

 

[below_freezing]

The Chinese are incapable of any land grabbing from India - but if the communist regime in Peking would do well to leave Tibet - a country which it has illegally occupied.

Correct. China does not grab land. India grabs land. India is illegally occupying 50,000 km2 of Chinese territory. The fascist dictatorship in Delhi is an aggressive power that has already annexed 2 independent, sovereign states and crippled another.

 

[no_name]

There are lots of monks in tibet, others are bald head thugs.

 

[Akasa]

The Chinese are incapable of any land grabbing from India - but if the communist regime in Peking would do well to leave Tibet - a country which it has illegally occupied.

If Tibet was a country then so would Dehli and Mumbai.

Please go learn Chinese history before debating a topic that uses that knowledge as a foundation.

 

[Akasa]

and they did what?
2500 monks locked away and some how the monks fault.

1. Crowding outside a public area and causing disturbance
2. Disobeying regional laws
3. Confronting and provoking police officers
4. Using force to challenge public order

That's what they did.

 

[Jackdaws]

Correct. China does not grab land. India grabs land. India is illegally occupying 50,000 km2 of Chinese territory. The fascist dictatorship in Delhi is an aggressive power that has already annexed 2 independent, sovereign states and crippled another.

This may be the line of an authoritarian , communist regime - does not take away from the facts as the civilized world sees them. China would grab land if it was capable - like annexing Taiwan. Of course the did invade and illegally occupy Tibet too but then that is because it was easy to take over a country of peaceloving Buddhist monks.

 

[Jackdaws]

If Tibet was a country then so would Dehli and Mumbai.

Please go learn Chinese history before debating a topic that uses that knowledge as a foundation.

Not was - IS

The history you have been taught is force fed to you by a govt. and offers you a non-neutral perspective.

Tibet was forced to sign the Seventeen Point Agreement with China under duress after China illegally invaded Tibet - there is no such agreement between Bombay and India or Delhi and India - there are facts, not flights of fancy of communist China.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Not was - IS

Not one single government in the ENTIRE world, recognizes Tibet as an independent country.

Including your own Indian government.

 

[prototype]

Correct. China does not grab land. India grabs land. India is illegally occupying 50,000 km2 of Chinese territory. The fascist dictatorship in Delhi is an aggressive power that has already annexed 2 independent, sovereign states and crippled another.

which one?

 

[below_freezing]

which one?

Pakistan, in a move that resembled the setting up of Manchukuo by Japan in the 1930's.

Of course, India worships not only its former colonial masters, but the barbaric Japanese Empire, and even copies its war tactics, such as false accusations of expansionism when itself is the expansionist, and the setting up of fake governments. However, we all know how the Japanese Empire ended, in atomic smoke.