What's new

CJ takes sou moto against his own Son !!

Is not there a conflict of interest. He should not sit on the bench and let other judges to decide.
He could be biased against his son too( some people can become overjealous in guarding their honesty) and may give harsher punishment than he deserves.
He has distant himself from the proceedings
 
Great analysis by Dr. Shahid Masood


He said this scandal has been specifically made to create friction between Army and Judiciary. He said you will notice about 6 months back all of a sudden issue was raised by media about missing persons in Balochistan and many anchors did programs on it especially Hamir Mir who did back to back shows on this issue.
Now instead of asking government to do their job, they targeted judiciary that they should look into it, they should provide justice bla bla and then CJ took up the case which put Army in hot waters.
So now their plan is to malign CJ that he should resign, he should not be part of judiciay so justice can be served bla bla and hoping that Army won't come for his support as they have already created differences between them.

I will say that this Jang group especially Hamid Mir is one of the biggest snake in Pakistan who has ulterior motives. I do not like this man one bit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fully agreed.

Hamid Mir was the first one to say without any proof or anything that the army is behind this.

If you look into it, the videos and bribing have been goin on for two years, and two years back, only the government had an issue with CJ, not army, so government has more chance of being behind it.

Dr shahid masood isn't wrong in his point there.
 
Fully agreed.

Hamid Mir was the first one to say without any proof or anything that the army is behind this.

If you look into it, the videos and bribing have been goin on for two years, and two years back, only the government had an issue with CJ, not army, so government has more chance of being behind it.

Dr shahid masood isn't wrong in his point there.

I agree with this theory


Afterall things cant be that straightforward
 
I agree with this theory


Afterall things cant be that straightforward

SO what do you think???

Is not there a conflict of interest. He should not sit on the bench and let other judges to decide.
He could be biased against his son too( some people can become overjealous in guarding their honesty) and may give harsher punishment than he deserves.

He has resigned from the bench.

Another excellent program by Talat


Good show. He has given out his bank accounts, tax number, his house pictures, car pictures, and even his wife's assets.

Talat Hussain is a good journo, not in the league of Hamid Mir or those lot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not a single terrorist has been convicted during the last three years by supreme court or any other court.

Worse - these terrorists get out again to restart their dirty work.

Why didn't CJ take suo moto on such dys-functionalities of legal system? What could be more important than hanging these terrorists?

Here, I don't see Army and courts on the same page. Judiciary has not been helpful to the Army in the most critical matters of National security. The rift is there and it's ever widening.
 
Not a single terrorist has been convicted during the last three years by supreme court or any other court.

Worse - these terrorists get out again to restart their dirty work.

Why didn't CJ take suo moto on such dys-functionalities of legal system? What could be more important than hanging these terrorists?

Here, I don't see Army and courts on the same page. Judiciary has not been helpful to the Army in the most critical matters of National security. The rift is there and it's ever widening.

You are a typical PeePeePee jiyala or Altaf chooran wala's fan. Terrorists have been let go because of poor investigation by police. You know how police works in our country don't you!? There are loopholes in our current law system and it is the parliament's job to close those loopholes or bring new legislation. Judiciary is only there to implement or interpret it. But nobody is bringing new legislation because your favourite politicians are busy doing corruption, saying zinda hai bhutto zinda hai, enjoying holidays abroad on public expense e.t.c.
 
Not a single terrorist has been convicted during the last three years by supreme court or any other court.

Worse - these terrorists get out again to restart their dirty work.

Why didn't CJ take suo moto on such dys-functionalities of legal system? What could be more important than hanging these terrorists?

Here, I don't see Army and courts on the same page. Judiciary has not been helpful to the Army in the most critical matters of National security. The rift is there and it's ever widening.

Gathering evidence is not his job. It is the job of the police and all those agencies. Just like when the files were lost in the Asghar Khan case or some other one.

Laws need to be changed to cater to the terrorism needs, because under the current system people Like Maulana Abdul Aziz can go scotch free, i mean, how is evidence lacking against this guy???
 
The biggest terrorist amd killer musharaf run away, all those army generals followed his illegal order should be prosecuted
Biggest theif is our president, other crook is gilani, these politicians malign the country
Cj decision on missing person was right, every pakistani must be protected by law and stand fair trial so no one can take law into his hand

We should support independent judiciary, this is a serious conspiracy by cia and their agents including our govt.
 
poster 108- 109- 110 again forgetting Malik Riaz !!

Malik Riaz has 42 cases in SC against him.

.


Breaking News: larger bench rejected :tup:
 
Gathering evidence is not his job. It is the job of the police and all those agencies. Just like when the files were lost in the Asghar Khan case or some other one.

Laws need to be changed to cater to the terrorism needs, because under the current system people Like Maulana Abdul Aziz can go scotch free, i mean, how is evidence lacking against this guy???

For example most of the terrorists were or are nabbed by tracing their cell phones or by tapping their telephone. So when this crucial evidence is presented in Court, Court has no choice but to reject it because, In criminal panel code, there is not even a single law which cover scientific evidence as part of trial. So all scientific evidences are discarded and all terrorist walks free.

Now whose fault is it? To plug such gaps in law making? When Parliament can pass 18,19,20 amendment then why can not saviors of democracy can plug such piety gaps in constitution?

That's why most terrorists in Sawat and tribal areas will be persecuted in Army courts, Under Army law which cover such loopholes.
 
SO what do you think???
poster 108- 109- 110 again forgetting Malik Riaz !!

Malik Riaz has 42 cases in SC against him.

Yes he has many cases and things not going his way

The real beneficiary from this situation could have been PPP + Malik Riaz but CJ surprised them. :pakistan:

Some intresting news

news-08.gif


news-21.gif
 
AAJ NEWS REPORTING: an application has been moved in supreme court to register murder case against Malik Riaz. Case in relation to sudden death of Lt. Gen Imtiaz.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom