What's new

Chinook Helicopters

There are four classes of helos:

* Single
* Coaxial
* Intermeshing
* Tandem

The single main rotor is the most well known type, from the venerable Huey to the other Bells popular with civilians in news organizations, police forces, and medical transports.

The coaxial type is practically unheard and unseen today. This type has two rotors atop each other. The main performance issue with the coaxial is that the wash from the top rotor affects the lower. If the two rotors are close enough to each other, they can interfere in flight, resulting in a catastrophic failure.

The intermeshing type is when there are two rotors in the same plane and their rotating blades weaves between each other in motion. Obviously, the engineering for the intermeshing type must be complicated and precise enough. The main advantage for the intermeshing type over the single and coaxial is superior lift for slightly greater rotor area. Unfortunately, the greater mechanical complexity and maintenance demands of the intermeshing type offset the superior lift advantage, leaving the single type the most affordable and easiest to maintain.

The tandem type is where the Chinook and the new Osprey belongs. The Chinook has the advantage over the Osprey in that its longitudinal, or fore-aft, rotor arrangement with the aft rotor in a higher plane than the fore allow both rotors to overlap each other in motion without the mechanical complexity of the intermeshing type. The Osprey's lateral, or side-by-side arrangement, must have both rotors in the same plane, resulting in a greater total rotor area. It is noteworthy that the Osprey is fully capable of all flight modes with a single engine.

Note -- To date no one has yet to come up with an odd number rotors helo, except for the single main type. If there is going to be more than one, so far there are two and four rotors. And if there is going to be more than one rotor, the pair must rotate in opposite directions.
 
.
:coffee:obviously we are thankful to support by us on the matter but really what kind of ally is that that does not gives us helicopters or air defence and we have to deal with drones ?
 
.
There are four classes of helos:

* Single
* Coaxial
* Intermeshing
* Tandem

The single main rotor is the most well known type, from the venerable Huey to the other Bells popular with civilians in news organizations, police forces, and medical transports.

The coaxial type is practically unheard and unseen today. This type has two rotors atop each other. The main performance issue with the coaxial is that the wash from the top rotor affects the lower. If the two rotors are close enough to each other, they can interfere in flight, resulting in a catastrophic failure.

The intermeshing type is when there are two rotors in the same plane and their rotating blades weaves between each other in motion. Obviously, the engineering for the intermeshing type must be complicated and precise enough. The main advantage for the intermeshing type over the single and coaxial is superior lift for slightly greater rotor area. Unfortunately, the greater mechanical complexity and maintenance demands of the intermeshing type offset the superior lift advantage, leaving the single type the most affordable and easiest to maintain.

The tandem type is where the Chinook and the new Osprey belongs. The Chinook has the advantage over the Osprey in that its longitudinal, or fore-aft, rotor arrangement with the aft rotor in a higher plane than the fore allow both rotors to overlap each other in motion without the mechanical complexity of the intermeshing type. The Osprey's lateral, or side-by-side arrangement, must have both rotors in the same plane, resulting in a greater total rotor area. It is noteworthy that the Osprey is fully capable of all flight modes with a single engine.

Note -- To date no one has yet to come up with an odd number rotors helo, except for the single main type. If there is going to be more than one, so far there are two and four rotors. And if there is going to be more than one rotor, the pair must rotate in opposite directions.

The Idea did exist..
As to how they were ever going to make this monstrosity work..is beyond me.

Mil Mi-32
mi-32.jpg
 
.
The Idea did exist..
As to how they were ever going to make this monstrosity work..is beyond me.

Mil Mi-32
mi-32.jpg
Am not talking about concepts but in commercial production. It is not the number of rotor assemblies but in total rotor area that lift is most crucial. This reason is why the longitudinal tandem rotors arrangement is the most effective compromise for helos. The Osprey is a different issue being a 'tiltrotor' type.
 
.
So in your opinion.. think this could av ever worked??
The odd rotor config?
Considering the need to offset torque?
 
.
So in your opinion.. think this could av ever worked??
The odd rotor config?
Considering the need to offset torque?
Absolutely...If cost is no object to research and refine every aspects of the design. One of the major problems with multi-rotors helos is asymmetrical lift in the event of a rotor engine failure. The engineering complexity for a tri-rotors helo for this emergency is...:blink:
 
.
MI 26 is best suited for the job but it drinks alot of fuel too for heavy lift operations
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom