Chinese Missiles News & Discussions

[LKJ86]

HQ-16A and HQ-16B

---

 

[LKJ86]

Via @南部空军 from Weixin

 

[LKJ86]

Via @中国火箭军 from Weixin

 

[LKJ86]

Via @中国火箭军 from Weixin

 

[LKJ86]

HQ-17, HQ-16, and HQ-9

Via www.81.cn

 

[LKJ86]

Via @央广军事 from Weixin

 

[LKJ86]

HQ-17

By 杨健

 

[LKJ86]

Via @中部战区发布 from Weibo

 

[LKJ86]

Via @空军在线 from Weibo

 

[LKJ86]

Via @央广军事 from Weibo

 

[samsara]

View attachment 631774 View attachment 631775 View attachment 631776 View attachment 631777 View attachment 631778 View attachment 631779 View attachment 631780 View attachment 631781 View attachment 631782 View attachment 631783
Via @央广军事 from Weixin

Which missile is this one??

 

[LKJ86]

YJ-18 AShM and Type 052D DDG

Via @雷曼军事现代舰船 from Weixin

 

[LKJ86]

Via @东部战区 from Weixin

 

[xuxu1457]

The Hong Kong-based website ifeng.com has launched an online poll on whether China should increase the number of its nuclear warheads to 1,000.
90.73% thought it was necessary.
1. If 300 warheads can destroy the enemy, it is necessary to expand to 1000?
No need to waste funds 7.25% 21021 votes
It is necessary to increase the number just in case90.73% 262938 votes
Hard to say2.02% 5859 votes

2. Do you think the construction of nuclear deterrence system, which is more important in quantity and quality?

Quality is a priority, and there are still lessons to be made on our nuclear weapons delivery platform19.13% 55452 votes

Quantity is also a strength15.80% 45795 votes

If the funds are enough, both can be taken care of65.07% 188571 votes

3. Do you understand China's four policies in the nuclear field?

To understanding21.23% 61533 votes

Don't understand10.86% 31470 votes

Understand a part, such as not using nuclear weapons first67.91% 196815 votes

 

[samsara]

View attachment 634115
The Hong Kong-based website ifeng.com has launched an online poll on whether China should increase the number of its nuclear warheads to 1,000.
90.73% thought it was necessary.
1. If 300 warheads can destroy the enemy, it is necessary to expand to 1000?
No need to waste funds 7.25% 21021 votes
It is necessary to increase the number just in case90.73% 262938 votes
Hard to say2.02% 5859 votes

2. Do you think the construction of nuclear deterrence system, which is more important in quantity and quality?

Quality is a priority, and there are still lessons to be made on our nuclear weapons delivery platform19.13% 55452 votes

Quantity is also a strength15.80% 45795 votes

If the funds are enough, both can be taken care of65.07% 188571 votes

3. Do you understand China's four policies in the nuclear field?

To understanding21.23% 61533 votes

Don't understand10.86% 31470 votes

Understand a part, such as not using nuclear weapons first67.91% 196815 votes

Good input for making a page for distribution through other medium. Such polling is for gauging the general feeling and thinking of the Chinese society wrt the threat levels, frictions, tensions and risks faced by China caused by the moves done by the Trump regime. The latest news says that the US is pondering to conduct low yield nuclear test to put pressure on China and Russia. In particular the USA wanna engage China in some nuclear treaty, a three-party treaty that China declines to take part, and deems as silly due to the big gap in nuke weapons owned by the three. For sure the world is getting hotter due to the aggressive moves taken by the USA to maintain its dominance! A declining bloody empire like the USA is a very dangerous one, like the injured bull in bullfighting show!