Chinese Long March 5 heavy-lift launcher ready for January 2019 comeback flight

[Jlaw]

Stupid Indians bragging so shameless , till this day you rely on frenchies to send you large satellite. Your mk3 pathetic payload even less than China long march 2, which was 30 years ago technology.

Indian crashed their tiny payload to moon then claim they have an Indian flag on the moon? PATHETIC!!!

Get lost, so shameless coming here bragging and compare to China, we are not on the same level. I felt disgusted even talking to low life like you



He is a pathetic lying piece of shit, moderater please ban this Indian troll

On the contrary India already invented space travel 20,000 years ago. But the Vedic blue prints were destroyed.

 

[HariPrasad]

Here you go my retarded friend

https://www.seradata.com/analysis-what-exactly-is-shijian-17-upto/

Has your heavy lift rocket placed satellite for first time in 2018? Why do you guys hell band to ridicule yourselves on PDF. The rocket was first time used in 2016 which failed. Net time it was used in 2017 which also failed. I have wished good luck this time.

 

[Canuck786]

Well done and congratulation China!

 

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

Has your heavy lift rocket placed satellite for first time in 2018? Why do you guys hell band to ridicule yourselves on PDF. The rocket was first time used in 2016 which failed. Net time it was used in 2017 which also failed. I have wished good luck this time.

Typical indian troller.

Where is indian astronauts,yes,not been born yet!

 

[HariPrasad]

Sijian 17 launcher is new LM5 and there was "underperformance" in second stage I think. They had to balance by firing higher stage rocket motor for longer than planned. This is totally new heavy launch system and of course some bugs are going to be around. US rockets also fail all the time and European ones too

Yes, That is what I said and wished China best of luck for third launch. The troll army immediately poped up and declared it successful.

What is India's heaviest delivery to Geostationary at the moment? and to LEO? Not really on topic but I looked it up and the claim that India has heavy lifter depends on how a person defines heavy. The heaviest ISRO one is 4 ton to GTO and LM5 is 14 ton to GTO. China's previous generation of main utility rockets launch 5.5 ton to GTO.

That is true. This is our first rocket of 4 ton payload. We are working on increasing payload of all of our vehicle by factor two. i.e doubling the payload. If you search GSLV mk 2, you will find its payload 2 tons. We already have launched payload of 2250 KG with it and it is capable of launching 2.5 tons. All our figures are always understated whether it is rocket or missile range. We are launching our first highly cost effective rocket ready to use in 72 hours any time this year. It will launch satellites at just 10% of current cost. We are cost leader in upto 2000 kg launch and soon we shall be the cost leader upto 4000 kg catagory launch.

Typical indian troller.

Where is indian astronauts,yes,not been born yet!

Can you read bellow post of your Chinese who is not as stupid as you guys are.

Sijian 17 launcher is new LM5 and there was "underperformance" in second stage I think. They had to balance by firing higher stage rocket motor for longer than planned. This is totally new heavy launch system and of course some bugs are going to be around. US rockets also fail all the time and European ones too (this is where Indian and Chinese records are pretty decent and compares well with western ones). LM5 failure in first two was small scale. Second failure little worse than first one because the Satellite was still delivered to Geostationary orbit and currently operates. No one has disputed that or offered evidence to contradict this.

What is India's heaviest delivery to Geostationary at the moment? and to LEO? Not really on topic but I looked it up and the claim that India has heavy lifter depends on how a person defines heavy. The heaviest ISRO one is 4 ton to GTO and LM5 is 14 ton to GTO. China's previous generation of main utility rockets launch 5.5 ton to GTO.

 

[Mohrenn]

Has your heavy lift rocket placed satellite for first time in 2018? Why do you guys hell band to ridicule yourselves on PDF. The rocket was first time used in 2016 which failed. Net time it was used in 2017 which also failed. I have wished good luck this time.

Dude you have brain damage

 

[LKJ86]

 

[Han Patriot]

Guys can we report him. Trolling after so much evidence provided.

 

[HariPrasad]

Guys can we report him. Trolling after so much evidence provided.

Your stupid gang believes that you will sell your lies forever. The good thing is that now you guys are exposed by none other than your country man.

serenity said: ↑
Sijian 17 launcher is new LM5 and there was "underperformance" in second stage I think. They had to balance by firing higher stage rocket motor for longer than planned. This is totally new heavy launch system and of course some bugs are going to be around. US rockets also fail all the time and European ones too (this is where Indian and Chinese records are pretty decent and compares well with western ones). LM5 failure in first two was small scale. Second failure little worse than first one because the Satellite was still delivered to Geostationary orbit and currently operates. No one has disputed that or offered evidence to contradict this.


What is India's heaviest delivery to Geostationary at the moment? and to LEO? Not really on topic but I looked it up and the claim that India has heavy lifter depends on how a person defines heavy. The heaviest ISRO one is 4 ton to GTO and LM5 is 14 ton to GTO. China's previous generation of main utility rockets launch 5.5 ton to GTO.
Click to expand...

You can stop your lies now.

 

[Han Patriot]

Yes, That is what I said and wished China best of luck for third launch. The troll army immediately poped up and declared it successful.



That is true. This is our first rocket of 4 ton payload. We are working on increasing payload of all of our vehicle by factor two. i.e doubling the payload. If you search GSLV mk 2, you will find its payload 2 tons. We already have launched payload of 2250 KG with it and it is capable of launching 2.5 tons. All our figures are always understated whether it is rocket or missile range. We are launching our first highly cost effective rocket ready to use in 72 hours any time this year. It will launch satellites at just 10% of current cost. We are cost leader in upto 2000 kg launch and soon we shall be the cost leader upto 4000 kg catagory launch.



Can you read bellow po

Your stupid gang believes that you will sell your lies forever. The good thing is that now you guys are exposed by none other than your country man.

serenity said: ↑
Sijian 17 launcher is new LM5 and there was "underperformance" in second stage I think. They had to balance by firing higher stage rocket motor for longer than planned. This is totally new heavy launch system and of course some bugs are going to be around. US rockets also fail all the time and European ones too (this is where Indian and Chinese records are pretty decent and compares well with western ones). LM5 failure in first two was small scale. Second failure little worse than first one because the Satellite was still delivered to Geostationary orbit and currently operates. No one has disputed that or offered evidence to contradict this.


What is India's heaviest delivery to Geostationary at the moment? and to LEO? Not really on topic but I looked it up and the claim that India has heavy lifter depends on how a person defines heavy. The heaviest ISRO one is 4 ton to GTO and LM5 is 14 ton to GTO. China's previous generation of main utility rockets launch 5.5 ton to GTO.
Click to expand...

You can stop your lies now.

The satellite was launch into orbit by its upper stage. Some Western speculators think it underperformed. But the real reason was there were testing the new upper stage...the rocket was not supposed to deliver the satellite to orbit, the upper stage was. If the rocket delivered it to orbit directly...how are you gonna test the upperstage?
We already provided so much evidence of the satellite still functioning. You are derailing it like a troll. Well typical Indian.

I don't mind having a healthy debate, but after so much evidence provided even from Reuters. Can you prove to me it failed?

 

[HariPrasad]

The satellite was launch into orbit by its upper stage. Some Western speculators think it underperformed. But the real reason was there were testing the new upper stage...the rocket was not supposed to deliver the satellite to orbit, the upper stage was. We already provided so much evidence of the satellite still functioning. You are derailing it like a troll. Well typical Indian.

Now exposed by your own country man, you have come up with new gimmick.

 

[Han Patriot]

Now exposed by your own country man, you have come up with new gimmick.

What did he 'exposed'? Exactly? He ''thinks' and I don't even know if he is Chinese. Please write to Reuters and CNN and tell him we failed. After F2 flight we announced the failure within a few hours. If this is not transparency, what is?

Now exposed by your own country man, you have come up with new gimmick.

If you can't have a decent debate with evidence then you are trolling repeating the same statement like a parrot. Hey I didn't even laugh when ur pslv failed.

Btw, even by taking cz-5 out of the equation, your space launch capability is only 3.5 tons proven. That's a 25 year old Chinese capability.

Guys please report this troll. All he does is saying we lie without any peoof to back it up

 

[serenity]

I said I think it is possible that there was an unplanned issue with first launch of Sijian 17 but the satellite was delivered into desired orbit and is functioning. The real failure was in second launch. These are the open sourced information. May be true, may be false. Who cares guys. LM5 MAYBE have some issues but all new designs could have great designs once issues are fixed. That's all a MAYBE. Let's move on.

 

[Han Patriot]

I said I think it is possible that there was an unplanned issue with first launch of Sijian 17 but the satellite was delivered into desired orbit and is functioning. The real failure was in second launch. These are the open sourced information. May be true, may be false. Who cares guys. LM5 MAYBE have some issues but all new designs could have great designs once issues are fixed. That's all a MAYBE. Let's move on.

Actually I can't blame you. The western media was speculating that it 'under performed' when they used the upper stage. The point was we were supposed to test the upper stage. If we delivered it exactly to orbit, then how are we gonna test the upper stage? Regardless, the rocket delivered the satellite to orbit.

NILGIRI, please give a cheer to your troll here. You must be proud of him.

 

[serenity]

Yes the satellite was delivered and the rest is guessing and politically motivated speculations made by people who may not know much about what they are claiming. Who cares about that now. Everyone said what they wanted to say.

I hope you are not calling me the troll here. No one is trolling less than I am in this discussion.