Yes, I see the analogy.
As I always say, you can't make everyone happy. This is pragmatic diplomacy.
I also understand any Geo-Political configuration is complex. And one needs to do careful balancing to avoid damages.
Pakistan, if not the ordinary Pakistanis, I mean the masses, has relationship with US. US earned that relationship risking a conflict with the Soviet during 1971. Hope you understand what I say here. OK, lets even forget this one.
Lets assume Pakistan has good relationship with the US. OK? US is enemy number 1 of China. Pakistan is China's friend. Now, China cannot militarily challenge US. Would not it be wise to have a friend like Pakistan whose fiend is US? Would not it be wise to have Pakistan as a friend who can help avoid any kind of conflict between China and US, as far as China's Western border is concerned?
OK, lets see the other-side of the story. China was compelled to launch retaliatory military measures against indian invasion in 1962. Such kind of hostility India once showed to China. US supported india against China. India still has good relationship with US. Now, if China thinks that india will play the role of a mediator between China and US to help reduce differences between China and US, then god help China.... India will again back stab China with the help of US. Don't forget Dalai is still there in Dharamtala... waiting for the conclusion. Dalai want to do something with the help of india and US before his death.
Now... Pakistan which has never gone against China, is very important ally of China because Pakistan has relationship with the US, which in collaboration with india want to split Tibet from China. Pakistan can play a vital role between China and US, thereby neutralizing india's military misadventure. Otherwise, US and india would not hesitate to fulfill Dalai's wishes.
Yes, in this world of globalization, China has to maintain trade and other diplomatic relationship with india. I agree. But that must not become an obstacle to the relationship between China and Pakistan. Careful balancing is what I emphasize here. At the same time, as China experienced a blatant deception in 1962 from india, China must keep some safe distance between itself and india. Beijing must not become too excited by any indian action.
For example, why did Beijing started showing eagerness that it will support india's UNSC membership? What was the need for such statements from Beijing when not even the US is eager to make india permanent member in UNSC? What did Beijing want to prove?
Can't Beijing understand that india will use its veto power against China's interests once it become permanent UNSC member? Does not the leadership have any common sense?
Or are they saying that ohhh forget 1962... again let us play brotherhood drama.... until China loses remaining control over China's Tibet?
Opium effect or what...? I want the answer.
Sometimes it is necessary to keep silence. China should have kept silence without declaring that China would support india in UNSC.
You can't make everyone happy. Some will always be less satisfied. Therefore, it is time for China to choose sides. China can't be neutral. In fact, in reality, neutrality does not exist. You have to select your side in Geo-Political game.