What's new

Chinese Economy/Development thread (updated regularly)

Status
Not open for further replies.
High-speed rail deals on move - People's Daily Online December 04, 2010

China is expected to sign a batch of cooperation documents with other countries that are interested in China's railway progress during the upcoming Seventh World Congress on High Speed Rail in Beijing next week, a senior railway official said.

Chen Juemin, director-general of the international cooperation department at the Ministry of Railways, said in a written reply to China Daily that CSR Corporation Limited, one of China's largest rail vehicle producers, and General Electric Co had initiated a framework agreement to establish a joint venture in the United States to manufacture high-speed trains using China's high-speed train technology.

Sources close to the deal said it is likely to be inked during the conference that runs between Dec 7 and 9.

Bloomberg reported on Friday that CSR and GE may bid to build high-speed train lines in California and Florida after US President Barack Obama spurred investment in railways.

And Beijing-based CSR's chairman, Zhao Xiaogang, told reporters in Hong Kong on Friday that the two companies may also bid for a project on the US' east coast.

The companies have not yet decided what form their cooperation will take and which lines they will bid on during the coming three years, he said.

Other agreements or memorandums are also expected during the Seventh World Congress on High Speed Rail. Deals are likely to be inked between China and railway authorities and enterprises in Turkey, Sweden, Germany, Bulgaria, Canada, Slovenia and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea during the conference, Chen said.

It is not known how many of those deals will be related to high-speed railway technology.

The upcoming conference will be an opportunity for China to showcase its latest progress in the high-speed railway sector, Chen added.

China now leads the world with 7,531 km of high-speed rail line in operation. It plans to more than double its high-speed passenger network to about 16,000 kilometers by 2020.

The service speed of China's high-speed network is up to 350 km/h.

"China's progress, development mode, technical innovations and cooperation opportunities in the high-speed railway sector will interest the delegates to the conference," he said.

"While displaying our progress, we are also willing to share with our counterparts our technical progress and practical experiences."

The Seventh World Congress on High Speed Rail in Beijing will be the first time that a country from outside Europe has hosted the event.

Initiated and organized by the International Union of Railways since 1992, the conference is said to be the leading global event for showcasing and exchanging views on the developments and achievements of the world's high-speed rail ventures.

The conference will feature high-level officials from international railway organizations and railway authorities from many countries as well as senior managers from global railway companies and high-speed railway experts.

The theme this year is "High Speed Rail Spearheading Greener Transport".

Source: China Daily
 
China's green food output exceeds 100 million tons - People's Daily OnlineDecember 06, 2010

Statistics from the China Green Food Development Center show that China currently has a total of more than 6,400 green food enterprises, an increase of nearly 7 percent compared with 2009.

The green food products that have been developed in China include 57 varieties in four major categories, namely agricultural and forestry and processed products, livestock and poultry products, aquatic products and beverage products, and cover more than 1,000 kinds of agricultural products and processed foods, and the output has exceeded 100 million tons.

China's green food and products have maintained stable and reliable quality through implementing standardized production and launching quality authentication as well as continuing to enhance supervision, according to the China Green Food Development Center.

Statistics show that the pass rate of the green product quality sampling in 2009 reached more than 98 percent, and the pass rate remains at more than 98 percent in 2010.

By People's Daily Online
 
100 million tons of iron ore discovered in China's Qinghai - People's Daily OnlineDecember 06, 2010

Roughly 100 million tons of iron ore was recently discovered in western China’s Qinghai Province by the Qinghai Nonferrous Geological Prospecting Bureau.

The newly-discovered iron ore contained five 200 to 450 meters long ore bodies, which have an average grad of 43 percent with a total thickness of nearly 217.4 meters by low magnetic anomaly inspection.

It was reported that the accumulated iron resources in this mine area was expected to reach up to 170 million tons, when the newly-discovered 63 million tons of iron ore resources are added.

By People's Daily Online
 
China to lead world in innovation by 2020: survey - People's Daily OnlineDecember 06, 2010

China is set to become the world's most important centre for innovation by 2020, overtaking both the United States and Japan, according to a public opinion survey to be published on Monday.

China is already the world's second-largest economy, after establishing itself as the global workshop for manufacturing. Now it wants to move up the value chain by leading in invention as well.

Today, the United States ranks as the world's most innovative country, with 30 percent of people surveyed taking that view, followed by Japan on 25 percent and China on 14 percent.

Fast-forward 10 years, however, and 27 percent of people think China will be top dog, followed by India with 17 percent, the United States 14 percent and Japan 12 percent, according to the survey of 6,000 people in six countries done by drugmaker AstraZeneca.

The shift is not because the United States is doing less science and technology, but because countries like China and India are doing more - a fact reflected in a spike-up in successful Asian research efforts in recent years.

A study last month from Thomson Reuters showed China was now the second-largest producer of scientific papers, after the United States, and research and development (R&D) spending by Asian nations as a group in 2008 was $387 billion, compared with $384 billion in the United States and $280 billion in Europe.

Asian confidence

Working out just how fast the world's new emerging market giants are developing their know-how is critical to many technology-focused companies in the West, as they seek to redeploy R&D resources.

The pharmaceutical industry, in particular, has been anxious to tap into China's science base and many companies, including AstraZeneca, have established Chinese centres as they try to reignite R&D productivity in laboratories at home.

The survey across Britain, the United States, Sweden, Japan, India and China found a strong sense of optimism amongst people living in China and India, in contrast to relative pessimism in the developed Western economies.

More than half of those in China and India thought their home countries would be the most innovative in the world by 2020, while just one in 20 Britons thought Britain would be able to claim this title.

There was an notable east-west divide in views of what had been the most important scientific breakthroughs. People in Asia put communications and computing top, while US and European respondents placed equal importance on the invention of vaccines and antibiotics, the survey found.

Source:chinadaily.com.cn/Agencies
 
Behind China's trade surplus with United States - People's Daily Online
December 06, 2010

F201012060850136419273568.jpg


For an iPod player that is assembled in China and sold in the United States at a price of 299 U.S. dollars, its corporate headquarters in the United States would get 163 dollars and Chinese laborers 4 dollars. But every iPod player would add 150 dollars to China's trade surplus with the United States.

This inconvenient truth behind China's trade surplus is often "ignored" by U.S. politicians, who would point a finger at China for trade imbalances with the United States.

The iPod case was given by researchers at the University of California. Barry Bosworth of the Brookings Institution was another scholar who would not ignore the basic facts about China's trade surplus with the United States. He found that the rate of return of the iPhone, another product of the Apple Incorporation, was as high as 60 percent. But the assembly in China represented only 7 percent of its total cost. It is not hard to find out what Chinese laborers could get was nominal.

These cases show that U.S. companies that have operations in China, instead of Chinese, are the biggest winners in U.S.-China trade. The Chinese side, at the same time, takes the blame for causing trade imbalances.

China's trade surplus with the United States is as high as 27.8 billion U.S. dollars in September, 2010, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. But China's trade surplus mainly comes from processing or products of foreign-funded companies in China, which are fattening foreign companies.

As a matter of fact, in China-U.S. trade, China had a surplus in processing, but a deficit in general trade; it had a surplus in trade of goods, but a deficit in trade of services.

According to statistics, between 2004 and 2008, U.S. surplus in trade of services with China registered an average annual growth of 35.4 percent, much higher than the growth rate of China's surplus in trade in goods during the same period.

It means that the structural characteristics of China-U.S. trade is determined by economic globalization, international industry transfers and comparative advantages of China and the United States.

It is unreasonable for some people to link U.S. unemployment with China's trade surplus with the country, because U.S. companies would move out of the country for cheap labor anyway.

China-U.S. economic and trade cooperation benefits both countries. As a matter of fact, the Americans are gaining handsomely from trade with China.

Trade imbalances, of course, need to be addressed. On the one hand, China needs to continue to increase imports from the United States. But Washington, on the other hand, should recognize China's market economy status and loosen restrictions on export of U.S. products to

Source: Xinhua
 
Sino-Korean industrial park to settle in Chongqing - People's Daily Online December 06, 2010

Taking the recent 950 million U.S. dollars investment in the Liangjiang New Area from the Hankok Tire as an opportunity, Chongqing is to set up a Sino-Korean industrial park.

According to the 17th economic and trade meeting in southwest China's Chongqing City on Dec. 5, both parties from the two countries reached consensus to establish an industrial park in Chongqing's Liangjiang New Area that will utilize the well-developed Sino-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park mode.

The industrial park is expected to provide Korean enterprises a positive platform to enter the interior regions of China and to further enhance the Sino-Korean economic and trade ties.

Delegations from the Chinese and Korean government and large Korean chaebols, conglomerates of businesses usually owned by one family, including Samsung, Hyundai, LG, SK and Pohang Iron and Steel as well as more than 100 local enterprises, attended this meeting.

The meeting was jointly managed by China's Ministry of Commerce and South Korea's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

By Li Mu, People's Daily Online
 
China's air defences get mobile and multiply
By Robert Hewson


The air defence systems on display at Airshow China in November showed a strong emphasis on deployable, multi-functional weapons with the export market firmly in mind.

Several new design approaches were in evidence as China's range of mobile and man-portable air defence systems (MANPADS) continues to expand.

Alongside the existing QW-18 shoulder-launched missile, details were given of an improved QW-18A with new electric servo control actuators for improved guidance and flight characteristics plus a laser proximity fuze not found on the earlier QW-18. Data from manufacturer China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC) indicated that the QW-18A may have an imaging infra-red seeker, which it describes as "temperature-comparing discrimination".

A new CASIC MANPADS weapon, the QW-19, was also shown. It had all the enhanced performance features attributed to the QW-18A, including a new grip design (SK-19) with a revised battery and cooling system. It is possible that the data for the QW-18A was released in error and actually refers to the missile designated QW-19.

A new variant of the QW-18 was fitted to the brand new FL-19 vehicle-mounted terminal air defence weapon system. The FL-19 has six single-shot missile tubes with an integral electro-optical (EO) target detection and tracking unit, all mounted on the rear section of an armoured light truck.
 
CPI growth to hit record high: economists - People's Daily Online December 07, 2010

F201012070833552455920951.bmp


Ahead of the release of the November economic data, chief economists from 23 financial organizations predicted that the growth of the consumer price index (CPI), a main gauge of inflation, in November is expected to hit a record high of 4.75 percent, according to a China Business News (CBN) report Monday.

Shen Jianguang, chief economist with Mizuho Securities China, said that compared with the inflation in 2007 and 2008, the liquidity and the assets bubble are stronger, and labor and resources face the pressure of cost increases.

The economists also said that the inflation for the whole year will not be too high, as the CPI in December will drop further and the CPI for the whole year is expected to grow 3.2 percent.

Zhou Wangjun, deputy chief of the price management department at the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), said Sunday that the December CPI growth will not exceed 5 percent and will be lower than the growth of November.

Some economists are concerned about rising inflation next year but Lian Ping, chief economist with the Bank of Communications, said that inflation is unlikely to be harmful.

Zhang Ping, vice director of the Institute of Economics under the ChineseAcademy of Social Sciences (CASS), said on Saturday that the country's CPI will grow more than 5 percent in the first quarter of next year.

Zhang pointed out that although the inflation pressure is large, the inflation will be under control if the government can keep a stable monetary policy, and he is still optimistic about the economic growth trend.

Zhang also said that the developed countries' monetary policies will be of some concern and that China's economic growth will still mainly rely on the growth of domestic demand.

According to Zhou, China should set up a salary increase mechanism to curb the increases of the commodity prices. He also said that the control of commodity prices should be made in priority with the use of economic and legal measures and he cautioned against the use of administrative measures.

In addition, amid the increased inflation, about half of the 23 economists predicted that the central bank may raise the interest rate again within the year.

Source: Global Times
 
China's Export potential and Aircraft Manufacturing By WALL STREET JOURNAL
By JEREMY PAGE

P1-AY507_cams_DV_20101205194003.jpg


ZHUHAI, China—A year after the collapse of the Soviet Union, a cash-strapped Kremlin began selling China a chunk of its vast military arsenal, including the pride of the Russian air force, the Sukhoi-27 fighter jet.

For the next 15 years, Russia was China's biggest arms supplier, providing $20 billion to $30 billion of fighters, destroyers, submarines, tanks and missiles. It even sold Beijing a license to make the Su-27 fighter jet—with imported Russian parts.

Today, Russia's military bonanza is over, and China's is just beginning.

After decades of importing and reverse-engineering Russian arms, China has reached a tipping point: It now can produce many of its own advanced weapons—including high-tech fighter jets like the Su-27—and is on the verge of building an aircraft carrier.

Not only have Chinese engineers mastered the prized Su-27's avionics and radar but they are fitting it with the last piece in the technological puzzle, a Chinese jet engine.

In the past two years, Beijing hasn't placed a major order from Moscow.

Now, China is starting to export much of this weaponry, undercutting Russia in the developing world, and potentially altering the military balance in several of the world's flash points.

This epochal turnaround was palpable in the Russian pavilion at November's Airshow China in the southern city of Zhuhai. Russia used to be the star of this show, wowing visitors with its "Russian Knights" aerobatic team, showing off fighters, helicopters and cargo planes, and sealing multibillion dollar deals on the sidelines.

This year, it didn't bring a single real aircraft—only a handful of plastic miniatures, tended by a few dozen bored sales staff.

China, by contrast, laid on its biggest commercial display of military technology—almost all based on Russian know-how.

The star guests were the "Sherdils," a Pakistani aerobatic team flying fighter jets that are Russian in origin but are now being produced by Pakistan and China.

"We used to be the senior partner in this relationship—now we're the junior one," said Ruslan Pukhov, of the Russian Defense Ministry's Public Advisory Council, a civilian advisory body to the military.

Russia's predicament mirrors that of many foreign companies as China starts to compete in global markets with advanced trains, power-generating equipment and other civilian products based on technology obtained from the West.

In this case, there is an additional security dimension, however: China is developing weapons systems, including aircraft carriers and carrier-based fighters, that could threaten Taiwan and test U.S. control of the Western Pacific.

Chinese exports of fighters and other advanced weapons also threaten to alter the military balance in South Asia, Sudan and Iran.

China's military muscle still lags far behind that of the U.S., by far the world's largest weapons manufacturer and exporter. China accounted for 2% of global arms transfers between 2005-2009, putting it in ninth place among exporters, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

But no other Asian country has sought to project military power—and had the indigenous capability to do so—since Japan's defeat in 1945.

China's rapid mastery of Russian technology raises questions about U.S. cooperation with the civilian faces of Chinese arms makers.

The Aviation Industry Corp. (AVIC), China's state aerospace company, builds fighters, for instance. But it is also making a new passenger jet with help from General Electric Co. and other U.S. aerospace companies. A GE official says the company has partnered with foreign engine manufacturers for decades "with elaborate protections built in place" that have preserved the company's intellectual property.

There are also implications for U.S. weapons programs. Last year the Pentagon decided to cut funding for the F-22—currently the most advanced fighter deployed in the world—partly on the grounds that China wouldn't have many similar aircraft for at least 15 years.

But then Gen. He Weirong, deputy head of China's Air Force, announced that Chinese versions of such jets were about to undergo test flights, and would be deployed in "eight or 10 years."


The Defense Intelligence Agency now says it will take China "about 10 years" to deploy stealth fighters in "meaningful numbers."

For Moscow and Beijing, meanwhile, a dispute over the intellectual-property rights to such weaponry is testing their efforts to overcome a long historical rivalry and build a new era of friendly ties.

"We didn't pay enough attention to our intellectual property in the past," said a Russian defense official. "Now China is even competing with us on the international market."

Few things illustrate this more clearly than the J-11B, a Chinese fighter that Russian official designation the Su-27, a one-seat fighter that was developed by the Soviets through the 1970s and 1980s as a match for the U.S. F-15 and F-16.

Before the early 1990s, Moscow hadn't provided major arms to Beijing since an ideological split in 1956, which led to a brief border clash in 1969.

But after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Kremlin was desperate for hard currency. In 1992, China became the first country outside the former Soviet Union to buy the Su-27, paying $1 billion for 24.

The deal was a coup for China, which had shifted its military focus away from a potential Soviet land invasion, and now wanted to defend territorial claims over Taiwan and parts of the South China Sea and East China Sea.

Efforts to upgrade its air and naval forces had been hampered by U.S. and European Union arms embargoes imposed after the 1989 crackdown on protesters around Tiananmen Square.

China's military modernization program grew more urgent after its leaders were stunned by the display of U.S. firepower during the first Gulf War, Western military officials say.

Beijing's breakthrough came in 1996, when it paid Russia $2.5 billion for a license to assemble another 200 Su-27s at the Shenyang Aircraft Company.

The agreement stipulated that the aircraft—to be called the J-11—would include imported Russian avionics, radars and engines and couldn't be exported.

But after building 105, China abruptly canceled the contract in 2004, claiming the aircraft no longer met its requirements, according to Russian officials and defense experts.

Three years later, Russia's fears were confirmed when China unveiled its own version of the fighter jet—the J-11B—on state television.

"When the license was sold, everyone knew they would do this. It was just a risk that was taken," said Vassily Kashin, a Russian expert on the Chinese military. "At that time it was a question of survival."

The J-11B looked almost identical to the Su-27, but China said it was 90% indigenous and included more advanced Chinese avionics and radars. Only the engine was still Russian, China said.

Now it is being fitted with a Chinese engine as well, according to Zhang Xinguo, deputy president of AVIC, which includes Shenyang Aircraft.

You cannot say it's just a copy," he said. "Mobile phones all look similar. But technology is developing very quickly. Even if it looks the same, everything inside cannot be the same."

The J-11B presented Russia with a stark choice—to continue selling China weapons, and risk having them cloned, too, or to stop, and miss out on its still lucrative market.

Russia's initial response was to suspend talks on selling China the Su-33, a fighter with folding wings that can be used on aircraft carriers.

Since then, however, it has re-opened negotiations on the Su-33, although it rejected China's offer to buy just two, and insisted on a larger order.

Sukhoi Aviation Holding Co.'s official position now is that it remains confident about its business in China.

Indeed, many aviation experts believe AVIC is having problems developing an indigenous engine for the J-11B with the same thrust and durability as the original Russian ones.

Sukhoi is betting that China will have to buy the Su-33 on Russian terms as Beijing will struggle to develop its own carrier-based fighter in time for the planned launch of its first carriers in 2011 or 2012.

The company also hopes to sell China the Su-35—a more advanced version of the Su-27—if the J-11B doesn't perform well enough.

"We're just hoping our aircraft will be better," said Sergey Sergeev, deputy director general of Sukhoi. "It's one thing to make a good quality copy of a spoon, but quite another to make one of an aircraft."

The Russian and Chinese governments both declined to comment.

In private, however, Russian officials say they worry that China is about to start mass producing and exporting advanced fighters—without Russian help. China bought $16 billion worth of Russian arms between 2001 and 2008—40% of Russia's sales.

Photographs published recently on Chinese military websites appear to show engines fitted on the J-11B and a modified version—called the J-15—for use on aircraft carriers.

That has compounded Russian fears that China has reverse engineered an Su-33 prototype it acquired in 2001 from Ukraine, according to Russian defense experts.

At last year's Dubai Air Show, China demonstrated its L-15 trainer jet for the first time. In June, China made its debut at the Eurosatory arms fair in France.

In July, China demonstrated the JF-17—the fighter developed with Pakistan—for the first time overseas at the Farnborough Airshow in Britain.

China also had one of the biggest pavilions at an arms fair in Capetown in September.

"They're showing up at arms fairs they've never been to before," said Siemon T. Wezeman, an arms trade expert at SIPRI. "Whereas 15 years ago they had nothing really, now they're offering reasonable technology at a reasonable price."


China is generating particular interest among developing countries, especially with the relatively cheap JF-17 fighter with a Russian engine.

The Kremlin has approved the re-export of the engine to Pakistan, as it has no arms business there.

But it was enraged last year when Azerbaijan, an ex-Soviet republic, began talks on buying JF-17s, according to people familiar with the situation.

Also last year,JF-17s and Russia's MiG-29s competed in a tender from Myanmar, which eventually chose the Russians, but paid less than they wanted.

This year, both entered a tender from Egypt, with China offering the JF-17 for $10 million less than Russia's $30 million MiG-29.

That prompted Mikhail Pogosyan, who heads Sukhoi and the company that makes MiGs, to suggest that the Kremlin stop selling China the Russian engines for the JF-17.

The Kremlin hasn't done that yet, but Russian officials have suggested privately taking legal action if China exports more advanced jets like the J-11B.

Last month, Russia's government proposed new legislation attaching an intellectual property rights clause to foreign military sales agreements.

The issue was raised during a visit by President Dmitry Medvedev to China in October, according to people familiar with the situation.

"Of course we're concerned, but we also recognize there's very little we can do," said Mr. Pukhov, of the Russian Defense Ministry's Public Advisory Council.

Asked what advice he would give Western aerospace firms, Sukhoi's Mr. Sergeev said: "They should keep in mind what products they're selling—whether they're civilian or dual use. And most important is to prepare very carefully your contract documents."

While Russia worries about intellectual property, other countries are concerned about security. The arms programs China initiated two or three decades ago are starting to bear fruit, with serious implications for the regional—and global—military balance.

The J-11B is expected to be used by the Chinese navy as its frontline fighter, capable of sustained combat over the entire East China Sea and South China Sea.

Aircraft carriers and J-15 fighters would further enhance its ability to stop the U.S. intervening in a conflict over Taiwan, and test its control of the Western Pacific.

China's arms exports could have repercussions on regions in conflict around the world. Pakistan inducted its first squadron of Chinese-made fighter jets in February, potentially altering the military balance with India.

Other potential buyers of China's JF-17 fighter jet include Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Venezuela, Nigeria, Morocco and Turkey. In the past, China has also sold fighters to Sudan.

The potential customer of greatest concern to the U.S. is Iran, which purchased about $260 million of weapons from China between 2002-2009, according to Russia's Centre for Analysis of the Global Arms Trade.

In June, China backed U.N. sanctions on Iran, including an expanded arms embargo, but Tehran continues to seek Chinese fighters and other weaponry.
 
Source: New York Times
[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/07/education/07education.html]

Top Test Scores From Shanghai Stun Educators
By SAM DILLON
Published: December 7, 2010

07education_graph-popup.jpg



With China’s debut in international standardized testing, students in Shanghai have surprised experts by outscoring their counterparts in dozens of other countries, in reading as well as in math and science, according to the results of a respected exam.

American officials and Europeans involved in administering the test in about 65 countries acknowledged that the scores from Shanghai — an industrial powerhouse with some 20 million residents and scores of modern universities that is a magnet for the best students in the country — are by no means representative of all of China.

About 5,100 15-year-olds in Shanghai were chosen as a representative cross-section of students in that city. In the United States, a similar number of students from across the country were selected as a representative sample for the test.

Experts noted the obvious difficulty of using a standardized test to compare countries and cities of vastly different sizes. Even so, they said the stellar academic performance of students in Shanghai was noteworthy, and another sign of China’s rapid modernization.

The results also appeared to reflect the culture of education there, including greater emphasis on teacher training and more time spent on studying rather than extracurricular activities like sports.

“Wow, I’m kind of stunned, I’m thinking Sputnik,” said Chester E. Finn Jr., who served in President Ronald Reagan’s Department of Education, referring to the groundbreaking Soviet satellite launching. Mr. Finn, who has visited schools all across China, said, “I’ve seen how relentless the Chinese are at accomplishing goals, and if they can do this in Shanghai in 2009, they can do it in 10 cities in 2019, and in 50 cities by 2029.”

The test, the Program for International Student Assessment, known as PISA, was given to 15-year-old students by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, a Paris-based group that includes the world’s major industrial powers.

The results are to be released officially on Tuesday, but advance copies were provided to the news media a day early.

“We have to see this as a wake-up call,” Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said in an interview on Monday.

“I know skeptics will want to argue with the results, but we consider them to be accurate and reliable, and we have to see them as a challenge to get better,” he added. “The United States came in 23rd or 24th in most subjects. We can quibble, or we can face the brutal truth that we’re being out-educated.”

In math, the Shanghai students performed in a class by themselves, outperforming second-place Singapore, which has been seen as an educational superstar in recent years. The average math scores of American students put them below 30 other countries.

PISA scores are on a scale, with 500 as the average. Two-thirds of students in participating countries score between 400 and 600. On the math test last year, students in Shanghai scored 600, in Singapore 562, in Germany 513, and in the United States 487.

In reading, Shanghai students scored 556, ahead of second-place Korea with 539. The United States scored 500 and came in 17th, putting it on par with students in the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and several other countries.

In science, Shanghai students scored 575. In second place was Finland, where the average score was 554. The United States scored 502 — in 23rd place — with a performance indistinguishable from Poland, Ireland, Norway, France and several other countries.


The testing in Shanghai was carried out by an international contractor, working with Chinese authorities, and overseen by the Australian Council for Educational Research, a nonprofit testing group, said Andreas Schleicher, who directs the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s international educational testing program.

Mark Schneider, a commissioner of the Department of Education’s research arm in the George W. Bush administration, who returned from an educational research visit to China on Friday, said he had been skeptical about some PISA results in the past. But Mr. Schneider said he considered the accuracy of these results to be unassailable.

“The technical side of this was well regulated, the sampling was O.K., and there was no evidence of cheating,” he said.

Mr. Schneider, however, noted some factors that may have influenced the outcome.

For one thing, Shanghai is a huge migration hub within China. Students are supposed to return to their home provinces to attend high school, but the Shanghai authorities could increase scores by allowing stellar students to stay in the city, he said. And Shanghai students apparently were told the test was important for China’s image and thus were more motivated to do well, he said.

“Can you imagine the reaction if we told the students of Chicago that the PISA was an important international test and that America’s reputation depended on them performing well?” Mr. Schneider said. “That said, China is taking education very seriously. The work ethic is amazingly strong.”

In a speech to a college audience in North Carolina, President Obama recalled how the Soviet Union’s 1957 launching of Sputnik provoked the United States to increase investment in math and science education, helping America win the space race.

“Fifty years later, our generation’s Sputnik moment is back,” Mr. Obama said. With billions of people in India and China “suddenly plugged into the world economy,” he said, nations with the most educated workers will prevail. “As it stands right now,” he said, “America is in danger of falling behind.”

If Shanghai is a showcase of Chinese educational progress, America’s showcase would be Massachusetts, which has routinely scored higher than all other states on America’s main federal math test in recent years.

But in a 2007 study that correlated the results of that test with the results of an international math exam, Massachusetts students scored behind Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. Shanghai did not participate in the test.

A 259-page Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development report on the latest Pisa results notes that throughout its history, China has been organized around competitive examinations. “Schools work their students long hours every day, and the work weeks extend into the weekends,” it said.

Chinese students spend less time than American students on athletics, music and other activities not geared toward success on exams in core subjects. Also, in recent years, teaching has rapidly climbed up the ladder of preferred occupations in China, and salaries have risen. In Shanghai, the authorities have undertaken important curricular reforms, and educators have been given more freedom to experiment.

Ever since his organization received the Shanghai test scores last year, Mr. Schleicher said, international testing experts have investigated them to vouchsafe for their accuracy, expecting that they would produce astonishment in many Western countries.

“This is the first time that we have internationally comparable data on learning outcomes in China,” Mr. Schleicher said. “While that’s important, for me the real significance of these results is that they refute the commonly held hypothesis that China just produces rote learning.”

“Large fractions of these students demonstrate their ability to extrapolate from what they know and apply their knowledge very creatively in novel situations,” he said.
 
CASS: China's GDP growth expected to top 10% in 2011 - People's Daily Online December 07, 2010

China will continue to record stable and rapid growth in 2011, and the growth rate is expected to top 10 percent, according to the Chinese Economy Blue Book 2011 released by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS.)

The blue book said that China's GDP growth for 2010 will be around 9.9 percent. Factors affecting the country's economic situation will not change significantly.

The basic drivers of domestic growth, world economic environment and the intensity of macro control policies are regarded as the major factors influencing China's economic growth, said the blue book.

Since the outbreak of the global financial crisis, the development mode driven by domestic demand has been consolidated, but its reliance on investment has become more clear. Expansionary policies since 2008 have strengthened the domination role of domestic capital, with private funds warmed up.

The difficulties in global recovery have added to the uncertainties in the rebound of China's foreign trade sectors. Earlier this year, the World Bank expected that global economic growth for 2010 and 2011 will be 2.7 percent and 3.2 percent respectively, but recently claimed that world economic growth in 2011 won't exceed 2010 levels.

Macro control policies are also believed to have negative impact on economic growth. As investment in the real estate sector accounts for around 20 percent of China's overall urban fixed asset investment, the central government's tightening measures toward the property market will put pressure on China's economy.

Meanwhile, expanding loans to local governments' financing platform companies caused increasing repayment risks. The paces of fixed asset investment will slowdown with the regulation on these platform companies.

The blue book predicted that China's economy will still maintain a structure dominated by investment and supported by consumption in the short term. Outbound impact and the intensity of macro control measures will be major sources of fluctuations.

By People's Daily Online
 
Chinese wind power ready for international market - People's Daily Online December 07, 2010

The China National Energy Administration, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and U.S. Department of Commerce jointly held the U.S.-China Renewable Energy Forum on Dec. 6 in Beijing, with the theme of investment in wind power.

In recent years, renewable energy development has been booming in the world, and wind power development is especially rapid. Wind power has gained an important role in the construction of energy infrastructure.

Wind power has been one of the key areas in the Sino-U.S. exchanges and cooperation in energy.

China has the world's fastest-growing wind market, and is putting up a wind turbine every hour. Wind power capacity is expected to increase five fold over the next 10 years thanks to the government's clean energy drive.

Chinese wind companies are eager to tap into capital markets to boost their international profile and have had around half a dozen listings in the past year.

China's investment in renewable energy stands in contrast to the rest of the world. The country spent about 10 billion U.S. dollars in the second quarter of 2010 on wind energy alone, which is nearly half of the global total of 20.5 billion U.S. dollars, according to an Ernst &Young report.

The United States is the first in the world to develop wind power and its total wind power installed capacity is more than any other country. However, affected by the international financial crisis, enterprises generally lack funds.

But the wind power development in China has been expanding with the emergence of a large number of professional wind power investment businesses with great financial strength. These enterprises have the ability to enter the international market, and if they make investment in the United States, it can promote the companies' international development as well as encourage the sustainable development of a U.S. wind power market. However, due to a general lack of understanding of the U.S. market, many Chinese enterprises have concerns over investing in renewable energy in the United States.

The forum introduced the U.S. renewable energy investment policy, business rules, project development models and market conditions and other information to the Chinese companies to enhance Chinese enterprises' understanding of the U.S. market.

Participants in the forum said it further explores the huge potential for renewable energy cooperation between the two countries and can promote pragmatic cooperation in the renewable energy industry.

By People's Daily Online
 
Pilot of tri-network integration starts in Shanghai - People's Daily OnlineDecember 07, 2010

Shanghai has China's most complete fiber optic coverage

Shanghai launched a pilot of tri-network integration, which means the integration of telecom, radio and TV and the Internet, on Nov. 30.

According to the pilot scheme, by the year of 2011, Shanghai will be almost be covered by fiber-optic Internet communication technologies, broadband access in families will reach 100 megabits per second, and wireless broadband networks will cover the whole of Shanghai.

But what will the tri-network integration will bring?

Tri-network integration will integrate the advantages of different forms of media and provide convenience and efficient services to customers.

With the 100-megabit bandwidth access in households and the coverage of wireless broadband, Shanghai residents will be able watch high-definition programming at anytime and anywhere.

It is expected the tri-network integration will also create new industries.

By Liang Jun, People's Daily Online
 
The Truth About China's GDP

By Caitlin Dickson | December 07, 2010 12:08pm

China's famously booming GDP statistics are, according to yet another WikiLeaks cable released last week, not exactly real. Li Keqiang, a senior Chinese official and rumored front runner for the prime minister's chair, is quoted in the cable as having referred to the country's GDP numbers as "man-made" and "therefore unreliable." The Telegraph reports that "Chinese officials have repeatedly been found to have artificially inflated their local GDP figures in order to win face and hit their targets," and that, "on several occasions, the sum of all China's local GDP tallies added up to more than the national statistic."

This revelation might seem shocking, but those who have followed China's economy closely are not surprised to find out the books have been cooked.

* Called It! "Anyone watching China should know the numbers are very edgy," Robert Wenzel writes, referring to his own a recent blogpost on Economic Policy Journal in which he wrote, that "China's real estate market appears to be on the edge of breaking down. It is very difficult to get reliable numbers out of China, so it is often best just to look at the anecdotal evidence."

* Not Exactly News Economic reports on China have hinted at something fishy for past couple of years. Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism agrees that, "this WikiLeaks release, like so many others, is not news to anyone who has been on this beat," and links to some of the articles that have kept her in the know.

* It All Makes Sense Now James Pethokoukis at Reuters makes the connection between China's fictional statistics and previous reports of ghost towns and giant empty malls that create the impression of a thriving population and commercial culture.

* Look Out, Assange Tracy Alloway at Financial Times Alphaville warns that "WikiLeaks, fresh from angering US authorities, might be about to incur the wrath of China's economic establishment."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom