royalharris
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2016
- Messages
- 1,105
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
who care, GNA win or LNA win?That’s why haftar is “winning” in gharyan hahahahah
China don't pick side
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
who care, GNA win or LNA win?That’s why haftar is “winning” in gharyan hahahahah
Fair from you but you can’t compare a MALE and tactical UAV of course that wing loong has better specs(range payload and satcom) but in libya war TB2 is more efficient and probably better managed that’s why some are saying that TB2 is better you shouldn’t take it by default as a insult for wing loong turkish counterpart is ANKA-S and AKSUNGUR I won’t add AKINCI because this beast doesn’t have competition at least for nowwho care, GNA win or LNA win?
China don't pick side
Can you give me quick list of specs for wing loong II i couldn’t find it on net usually it is harder to find specs of Chinese military equipment if you can also for other chinese UCAV like ch-4 etcAll the present Turkish drones are weaker than winglong II, except the ones on PPT
But winglong is just export version
Russians have published the results,
14 TB2 killed by winglong
Even your clever officials have told you their clever diversified strategies of using the roads, in the other words" Put TB2 on pickups running all around for fear of being butchered"
Compared with winglong,Turkish drone is slower , lower altitude, lower endurance, less munition,shorter leg, bad communication.
To compete with winglong, it need large amount of ground radars and missiles help.
Yes this is all true I wanted to explain the same thing to chinese users our best advantage is that we constantly operate uavs in operations so there are new and new upgrades also in libya turkish team manages it that’s why it is very beneficial for GNA operations otherwise if locals operated it then it would be a disasterclass because they have IQ -200 hahahahah ANKA-s primary function is to provide various types of intelligence gathering of course it has option for bombing but that is secondary function TB2 is light armed but has pin point effective precision strikes and low economic costs this is the reason why it is more used by TR army and the other reason is because TB2 served as testing platform for the real thing its successor AKINCI that will releive/enhanced greatly F-4 and F-16 in ground attack operationsBayraktar is a pretty Mobile system. Thats why You couldnt shoot any of it because We dont park them to the airports. We builded a network in Libya thanks to this its range is alot. We could have use Anka-S it has satcom but bayraktar is much more mobile And thats why more lethal. You dont know where it is, You dont know when it will come. You dont know where it is gonna land. Its taking off from a regular Road, bomb the enemy after that it lands another regular road. Like a ghost.
And A plus We know our own product, We know its limits, We know its real capacity. We are taking care of maintance ourself...
Haftar And UAE doesnt know anything about chinese ucavs... they are just incompetent buyers. They probably send ucavs to china for maintance...
Sorry,14 reported
Can you give me specs i am really interested about ch-4/wing loong IILosers, find all kinds of excuses
Can you give me specs i am really interested about ch-4/wing loong II
why waste time on you?He doesnt know a s'hit. Just saying his nationalist chinese bullshit, thats All.
Chinese military never show detail weapon information publiclyAfter we finished this hot “debate” can someone give me information about those chinese drones for which I asked previously? there’s nothing in details about them on net