What's new

China’s Tianhe-2 Ranked Fastest Supercomputer, Again; U.S. Systems ‘Nearing Historical Low’

senheiser

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Messages
4,037
Reaction score
-1
Country
Russian Federation
Location
Germany
China’s Tianhe-2 Ranked Fastest Supercomputer, Again; U.S. Systems ‘Nearing Historical Low’
Michael A. Katz | Nov 17, 2014 01:50 PM EST



TOP500 list of the world's most powerful supercomputers.


This year's ranking remained little changed among the top-10 fastest supercomputer with the only new entry, a 3.57 petaflop/s Cray CS-Storm system installed at an undisclosed U.S. government site, coming in at number 10.

Despite being able to boast the world's fastest computer, China saw the number of its systems on the list decline to 61, compared to 76 in June 2014, the last time the rankings came out. Over the same period, Japan increased its number of systems from 30 to 32.

Although the U.S. is still home of the supercomputer with the most overall systems at 231, this is down from 233 in June 2014, and 265 on the November 2013 list. Top500 says that "The U.S. is nearing its historical low number on the list."

The number of European systems increased to 130, up from the 116 reported in last June's ranking, while the number of systems across Asia fell to 120 from 132.

The TOP500 list has been ranking the world's supercomputers since 1993, with the goal of providing a consistent measure of the performance growth of supercomputers. The group doesn't define "supercomputer," but uses a benchmark to rank systems and to decide if they qualify for the TOP500 list. All systems are ranked according to performance running the same Linpack benchmark application.

Performance Growth Slowing

In the most recent ranking, the overall growth rates of performance continues to be at historically low values for the last two years.

The TOP500 says that deceleration in average performance of all 500 systems is influenced by the very large systems at the top of the list.

"Recent installations of very large systems - up to June 2013 - have counteracted the reduced growth rate at the bottom of the list," the group said in a statement. "But with few new systems at the top of the past few lists, the overall growth rate is now slowing."

This is supported by the fact that the performance of the last system on the list has consistently lagged behind historical growth trends for the past five years. That rate is now at 55 percent a year; however, between 1994 and 2008 the annual growth rate for the No. 500 systems' performance was 90 percent.

Other Highlights

* Total combined performance of all 500 systems has grown to 309 Pflop/s, compared to 274 Pflop/s in June and 250 Pflop/s from one year ago.

* There are 50 systems with performance greater than 1 petaflop/s on the list, up from 37 six months ago.

* The No. 1 system, Tianhe-2, and the No. 7 system, Stampede, use Intel Xeon Phi processors to speed up their computational rate. The No. 2 system, Titan, and the No. 6 system, Piz Daint, use NVIDIA GPUs to accelerate computation.

* A total of 75 systems on the list use accelerator/co-processor technology, up from 62 last year. Of these, 50 use NVIDIA chips, three use ATI Radeon, and there are now 25 systems with Intel MIC technology (Xeon Phi).

* Intel continues to provide the processors for the largest share (85.8 percent) of TOP500 systems.

* HP has the lead in systems with 179 (36 percent) compared to IBM with 153 systems (30 percent).



Read more: China’s Tianhe-2 Ranked Fastest Supercomputer, Again; U.S. Systems ‘Nearing Historical Low’ : Tech : Chinatopix
 
The goal is to produce exaflop computer by around 2020. 5 years from now, one single system could potentially triple the combined computing power of the current top 500 computer.
 
still light years ahead of Russia though :bounce:
6 out of the top 10 are USA
Russia top supercomputer is ranked 22nd :rofl: and only has 9 in the top 500 while the USA has 231 out of 500.

man you try so hard to spin the USA in negative light senheiser :azn:
 
still light years ahead of Russia though :bounce:
6 out of the top 10 are USA
Russia top supercomputer is ranked 22nd :rofl: and only has 9 in the top 500 while the USA has 231 out of 500.

man you try so hard to spin the USA in negative light senheiser :azn:
we are waiting until we have our own processors the Elbrus 8-C, why wasting money instead waiting to build much much cheaper and secure servers.

Russian company T platforms is 14 largest server manufacturer performance wise
List Statistics | TOP500 Supercomputer Sites

european countries like germany and uk maybe have more powerful servers but everything build by americans.
 
we are waiting until we have our own processors the Elbrus 8-C, why wasting money instead waiting to build much much cheaper and secure servers.

Russian company T platforms is 14 largest server manufacturer performance wise
List Statistics | TOP500 Supercomputer Sites

european countries like germany and uk maybe have more powerful servers but everything build by americans.

we will see how this turns out then :agree:
built by Americans well that's something you don't hear much nowadays :rofl:
 
Nothing to be proud of at all. Even though we in Europe are second with 130 in top 500. Its shame to read this:
* The No. 1 system, Tianhe-2, and the No. 7 system, Stampede, use Intel Xeon Phi processors to speed up their computational rate. The No. 2 system, Titan, and the No. 6 system, Piz Daint, use NVIDIA GPUs to accelerate computation.

* A total of 75 systems on the list use accelerator/co-processor technology, up from 62 last year. Of these, 50 use NVIDIA chips, three use ATI Radeon, and there are now 25 systems with Intel MIC technology (Xeon Phi).

* Intel continues to provide the processors for the largest share (85.8 percent) of TOP500 systems.

* HP has the lead in systems with 179 (36 percent) compared to IBM with 153 systems (30 percent)


This in itself should be a shame to us and all major countries who appeared in this list. It means its the U.S that controls/produces the main systems/software/processors of all the other countries super computer from the E.U to China, to Russia, to India, to Japan to South Korea etc. Even more so, the U.S still has more supercomputers in the top 500 than the E.U, China, and Japan combined.:tsk:

Senheiser, you shouldnt have posted this news at all. It shows every coutnry in the world lags by miles behind the U.S in this field. We are just assembling U.S chips/processors in our hardwares and calling them homegrown supercomputers. Its a disgrace to be honest. None of the countries above should be boasting at all until they can produce their own processors that are at par with U.S ones. It will take decades for that happen. Until then we should just keep hoping/silent .....:cray:
 
Nothing to be proud of at all. Even though we in Europe are second with 130 in top 500. Its shame to read this:
* The No. 1 system, Tianhe-2, and the No. 7 system, Stampede, use Intel Xeon Phi processors to speed up their computational rate. The No. 2 system, Titan, and the No. 6 system, Piz Daint, use NVIDIA GPUs to accelerate computation.

* A total of 75 systems on the list use accelerator/co-processor technology, up from 62 last year. Of these, 50 use NVIDIA chips, three use ATI Radeon, and there are now 25 systems with Intel MIC technology (Xeon Phi).

* Intel continues to provide the processors for the largest share (85.8 percent) of TOP500 systems.

* HP has the lead in systems with 179 (36 percent) compared to IBM with 153 systems (30 percent)


This in itself should be a shame to us and all major countries who appeared in this list. It means its the U.S that controls/produces the main systems/software/processors of all the other countries super computer from the E.U to China, to Russia, to India, to Japan to South Korea etc. Even more so, the U.S still has more supercomputers in the top 500 than the E.U, China, and Japan combined.:tsk:

Senheiser, you shouldnt have posted this news at all. It shows every coutnry in the world lags by miles behind the U.S in this field. We are just assembling U.S chips/processors in our hardwares and calling them homegrown supercomputers. Its a disgrace to be honest. None of the countries above should be boasting at all until they can produce their own processors that are at par with U.S ones. It will take decades for that happen. Until then we should just keep hoping/silent .....:cray:

It doesn't matter, our near future quantum supercomputer will use the Chinese made CPU.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom