What's new

China's one-child policy, population aging

somsak

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
1,320
Reaction score
0
Country
Thailand
Location
Thailand
It's the economy, stupid.


China's announcement that it would relax its long-standing policy of allowing couples to have only one child is likely to give China's slowing growth rate a boost.

The reason, according to Citigroup analysts, is that China's population (like the rest of Asia) is aging, and that could become a problem for pensions.

In China 8.5 percent of the population is currently over 65, and this is set to rise to 23.9 percent by 2050, according to United Nations data.

"China has reached a turning point where the demographic dividend will become a liability," said Shuang Ding, China economist at Citi.

Chinese state media reported Friday that the government would allow couples to have two children if one of the parents is an only child. The change was intended to promote "long-term balanced development of the population in China," according to the state-run Xinhua news agency.

Under the current law, couples living in Chinese cities can only have two children if neither have any brothers or sisters.

China's one child policy has meant the total fertility rate - the average number of children that a woman would give birth to over her lifetime - has declined from 3.0 during 1975 to 1980 to around 1.6 during 2005 to 2010, the Citi note said. The note was released in October in anticipation of the changes approved by China's rulers at its Third Plenary Session earlier this week.


"The resulting decline in the dependency ratio [the ratio of the working-age population to the dependent part of the population not in the labor force] has contributed significantly to China's amazing growth performance. However, working age population appears to have peaked...Population aging would reduce China's growth potential and put pressure on the pension system," added Ding.

China's economy has slowed in recent years as the government transitions from an investment led model to one based more on consumption.

Gross domestic product (GDP) rose 7.8 percent in the third quarter, up from 7.5 percent in the previous three months, but the pace has been lower than the double-digit growth rates it enjoyed in the past.

Citi foresees two possible scenarios for the economy, which could occur if families are allowed to have more children, based on a likely and an aggressive scenario.

In the more likely scenario, the total fertility rate will rise from its current level of 1.6 to 1.8, and would lead to 11 million additional births in the next five years. In the more aggressive scenario, the total fertility rate would to rise to 2, yielding 16 million births over the same period.

In the near-term, the consequential rise in the population from Citi's more likely scenario would add 0.1-0.2 percentage point to annual growth, while the aggressive scenario would add 0.2-0.3 percent point to annual growth.

And after 2030, when the baby boomers enter the labor force, annual growth could be lifted by 0.05 percentage point per year in the more likely scenario and 0.15 percentage point per year in the more aggressive scenario.


China also announced significant economic reforms, including a proposed change to the country's tightly-controlled banking sector, allowing the establishment of small and medium-sized private banks.

China's ruling party agreed the roadmap at the Third Plenum of its 18th Central Committee earlier this week. This secretive four-day meeting was the first opportunity the year-old administration led by Xi Jinping has had to set its policy agenda.

The Third Plenary Session of each new central committee has added historical significance as it was the meeting in which Deng Xiaoping adopted the open-door policy in 1978, and China entered the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1993.

Following the announcement, a senior U.S. Treasury official told Reuters that China’s leaders had shown that they were committed to market-based reforms, but that they faced a test in trying to deliver results.

"I think there is going to continue to be progress, but the question is how much and how quickly," said the official.

"The direction is significant, but the character and the pace of change matters."

Chinese leaders are under pressure to replace a growth model based on exports and investment that delivered three decades of rapid growth but has run out of steam. Reform advocates say Beijing must curb the privileges and dominant role of state companies they say are inefficient and a drag on growth.


In Friday's report, the ruling party pledged to ease barriers to private competitors in markets controlled by state companies, though they reaffirmed that government-owned industry is the core of the economy.

"We must promote orderly opening to the outside," the report said.

NBC's Patrick Rizzo, Alexander Smith and Li Le contributed to this report. Reuters also contributed.

First published November 15th 2013, 8:25 pm
What's behind China's one-child change? An aging workforce - NBC News
 
With a massive foreign $ reserves and already huge population, China still has plenty of leeway to experiment their population control.

The most alarming aging Asian country is South Korea, with their already small population. I wonder what's their policy regarding this.
 
With a massive foreign $ reserves and already huge population, China still has plenty of leeway to experiment their population control.

The most alarming aging Asian country is South Korea, with their already small population. I wonder what's their policy regarding this.

Japan is also an old aging society.
 
The enemy of East Asia is the birthing crisis. We just need to mate more.

How about merge China and Japanese togheter, you will gain 1.4 billion people and we will gain over 100 millions than problem solved :lol:. And since you guys know very well Kanji, we can use that as our standard communication.:rofl:
 
How about merge China and Japanese togheter, you will gain 1.4 billion people and we will gain over 100 millions than problem solved :lol:. And since you guys know very well Kanji, we can use that as our standard communication.:rofl:

Ha Ha Ha ! Boy oh Boy ! Well that would solve our population issue, wouldn't it? :lol:
 
How about merge China and Japanese togheter, you will gain 1.4 billion people and we will gain over 100 millions than problem solved :lol:. And since you guys know very well Kanji, we can use that as our standard communication.:rofl:

If so, 天皇陛下 will lose his job, because President Xi will totally take charge.
 
:laughcry: merging with Japan will solve Japan's problem but won't add too much value to our population since they have a lot of aging people.

So is China's. In fact, statistically speaking, the same phenomena that is affecting Japan, South Korea is also affecting China:


china_demography_2010.one_.jpg



south-korea-population-pyramid-2013.gif



japanPyramid.php.jpg


:coffee:
 
The purpose of China's one-child policy, is for aging population to reduce current 1.3billion Chinese ppl.

But now one-child family can have two children in China.
 
The purpose of China's one-child policy, is for aging population to reduce current 1.3billion Chinese ppl.

There are problems associated with this, with the sharp decrease in young births , this threatens the work force pool, which contribute to the economy of a nation. The increase in elderly citizens, who normally do not contribute to the nation's resources, but on the contrary, take resources through elderly social programs. The decrease in the working age group's ratio to the entire population may posit a deficit in the long run.

This is why it is important for all three nations in East Asia (China, Japan and South Korea) to improve overall birth rates. And to tackle this crisis before it becomes a threat later on.

East Asians will decrease in number whilst others will increase. Collectively we have to solve this issue, as three Confucian states. Political differences should be taken to the side, if you know what I mean.
 
There are problems associated with this, with the sharp decrease in young births , this threatens the work force pool, which contribute to the economy of a nation. The increase in elderly citizens, who normally do not contribute to the nation's resources, but on the contrary, take resources through elderly social programs. The decrease in the working age group's ratio to the entire population may posit a deficit in the long run.

This is why it is important for all three nations in East Asia (China, Japan and South Korea) to improve overall birth rates. And to tackle this crisis before it becomes a threat later on.

East Asians will decrease in number whilst others will increase. Collectively we have to solve this issue, as three Confucian states. Political differences should be taken to the side, if you know what I mean.
Compared with Japan & S.Korea, China has different situation, there'r already 1.3billion ppl and a developing nation.
Our problem is to control ppl numbers and improve the quality, allocate social resource efficiently. According to original plan of one-child policy should make Chinese ppl below than 1billion.
 
Compared with Japan & S.Korea, China has different situation, there'r already 1.3billion ppl and a developing nation.
Our problem is to control ppl numbers and improve the quality, according to original plan of one-child policy should make Chinese ppl below than 1billion.

I am in the position that regards a large population with strength. What I and other Japanese admire about Zhongguo is the shear size of Zhongguo. She has the land mass, the natural resources to support such a large population, and the basis for a large work force, that will propel the nation to new heights.

A large and healthy young population is , in its own right, a nation's greatest asset. It is the pool from which creativity will be drawn from to fuel the industry. These are the future politicians, military personnel, business entrepreneurs, policy makers, medical specialists, etc.

By severely reducing and limiting child rates, China reduces its greatest asset: man power. I think it would be to Zhongguo's asset and leverage to maintain a population well beyond the 1 billion mark. Its current growth trends, coupled with improvement in educational , health - medical resources, the quality of life for its people should increase as planned. While at the same time, pacing itself.
 
The purpose of China's one-child policy, is for aging population to reduce current 1.3billion Chinese ppl.

But now one-child family can have two children in China.

you have the chance that your parents don't have. Congrat ..
one-child policy violated the nature rule ... it's poor.
 
I think another issue with one-child policy is gender imbalance. Because abortion in China is still legal (sorry if I am wrong), or can be easily performed by whacky doctors and everyone want to have a son, China is having serious problem about gender imbalance. In some areas, the ratio between male:female can come to 120:100. Everyone makes jokes about how Chinese men go around and buy wives from neighbouring countries, but it's a fact that there are more Chinese men than Chinese women. Hopefully China can figure out an effective birth control policy.
 
Back
Top Bottom