China’s new nuclear submarine missiles expand range in US: analysts

[White and Green with M/S]

Su added the most significant improvement is the "turtleback" missile magazine, allowing the vessel to carry the Julang-3 submarine-launched ballistic missile — which has a range of about 12,000 km.

China's latest warships pose regional and US threat: Taiwan analyst | Taiwan News | 2021-04-25 12:00:00

Su Tzu-yun says new submarine can launch missile strike on US west coast from South China Sea | 2021-04-25 12:00:00

www.taiwannews.com.tw

@Surya 1 is troll don't engage with this brainless troll

 

[CAPRICORN-88]

I will love to find out whether or not, US Navy can track or detects this newly launched 094A SSBN.

 

[Surya 1]

I will love to find out whether or not, US Navy can track or detects this newly launched 094A SSBN.

A Russian expert had said that Chinese submarines are of 1970 technology. The thread is there on PDF.

ignore @Surya 1 bro he thinks China has a junk military and they have the best military in the world better than USA/Russia/UK, second biggest arms impoter of the world saying that and relying on west/Russia for military technologies LOL

China had been world's biggest arm importer for a long time. China has fifth generation fighter but yet it depends on 4th generation fighters of Russia for its Airforce. J20 for air show and su30, su35 etc for war.

 

[antonius123]

A Russian expert had said that Chinese submarines are of 1970 technology. The thread is there on PDF.

And how does the russian expert knew about it?

I believe he referret to older type 093.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

A Russian expert had said that Chinese submarines are of 1970 technology. The thread is there on PDF.

Well, anyone can say anything. But the fact is simple: in shipbuilding China gets paid by foreigners who entrust Chinese state owned with hundreds of millions USD worth of major commercial ships that last decades.

Meanwhile Russia had to buy Mistral from France and can't repair it's own aircraft carrier.

No offense to Russians or Indians but nobody can talk to China about shipbuilding.

 

[Surya 1]

And how does the russian expert knew about it?

I believe he referret to older type 093.

In the same way in which Chinese exprt adbised China not to mess with India else it can be dangerouus for Russai.

 

[Beast]

A Russian expert had said that Chinese submarines are of 1970 technology. The thread is there on PDF.


China had been world's biggest arm importer for a long time. China has fifth generation fighter but yet it depends on 4th generation fighters of Russia for its Airforce. J20 for air show and su30, su35 etc for war.

How old is that article? And how many warship has China imported from others for past 10 years?

 

[White and Green with M/S]

A Russian expert had said that Chinese submarines are of 1970 technology. The thread is there on PDF.

Based upon but it has a pump jet and lots of state of the art gadgets that's is not available on 70s era subs does you nuke subs will have pimp jet, and your Kolkata class destroyer and dehli class are modified version of 70s era Kolin and Koldin class old Soviet designs lol

 

[antonius123]

In the same way in which Chinese exprt adbised China not to mess with India else it can be dangerouus for Russai.

So that means they just base the judgement on hearsays, suspicion, and belief

 

[White and Green with M/S]

In the same way in which Chinese exprt adbised China not to mess with India else it can be dangerouus for Russai.

Because you have no capability to fight against China Dolkham and Galwan clashes are prove of that lol

 

[Surya 1]

Article may be 3 to 5 years ol old. I do not reme.ber exact time but it is on PDf.

Based upon but it has a pump jet and lots of state of the art gadgets that's is not available on 70s era subs does you nuke subs will have pimp jet, and your Kolkata class destroyer and dehli class are modified version of 70s era Kolin and Koldin class old Soviet designs lol

su 57 is modified design of su27.

Kolkatta class is a better destroyer than Type 52 in all aspects. Better stealth, more space, World's best defensive and offensive weapon with radar comparable to only agies system. Chinese destroyers no match to Kolkatta class.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Article may be 3 to 5 years ol old. I do not reme.ber exact time but it is on PDf.


su 57 is modified design of su27.

Kolkatta class is a better destroyer than Type 52 in all aspects. Better stealth, more space, World's best defensive and offensive weapon with radar comparable to only agies system. Chinese destroyers no match to Kolkatta class.

lol you're nothing know about military hardware, Type 52 has more fire power than your Kolkatta class you have 32 VLS on your destroyer but Type 52 has 64 VLS that's told the whole story rest of rants worth nothing to reply world weapon system that not prove, for example give me the cany clip that you Blah blah -8 SAMs intercepting supersonic anti ship missiles

and i am accepting this brainless trolling from you lol

 

[Surya 1]

Because you have no capability to fight against China Dolkham and Galwan clashes are prove of that lol

ha ha ha hs. Our soldiers enter Chines camp and slaughterd over 100 chinese dolders and foced them to back off 8 km and yet we have no capacity. Ask your friend china why did they choose to go back to 2 km behind finger 8 from finger 4? Do you want to win a bettle on pdf with lies which was lost in Himalaya?

lol you're nothing know about military hardware, Type 52 has more fire power than your Kolkatta class you have 32 VLS on your destroyer but Type 52 has 64 VLS that's told the whole story rest of rants worth nothing to reply world weapon system that not prove, for example give me the cany clip that you Blah blah -8 SAMs intercepting supersonic anti ship missiles

and i am accepting this brainless trolling from you lol

We have 32 tubes because it is more than enough. MR SAM is the only missile which can intercept a low flying cruise missile just 0.5 km away.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

ha ha ha hs. Our soldiers enter Chines camp and slaughterd over 100 chinese dolders and foced them to back off 8 km and yet we have no capacity. Ask your friend china why did they choose to go back to 2 km behind finger 8 from finger 4? Do you want to win a bettle on pdf with lies which was lost in Himalaya?

Yeah yeah whatever why not one brave Indian solider killed 100,000 PLA soldier with its bare hands lol we know you propaganda machine very well, and your own media telling you that Chinese capture 1000 sq km of your claim land, get some shame

We have 32 tubes because it is more than enough. MR SAM is the only missile which can intercept a low flying cruise missile just 0.5 km away.

And what about their supersonic cruise missile comparable to you mighty BRAHMOUSE such as YJ-12,

and i am want proof from you not just your wordings and most navies relying on short range SAMs to intercept low flying cruise missiles like ESSM (EVOLVED SEA SPARROW) RAM (ROLLING AIRFRAME MISSILE) SEA DART (UK) FUTURE CAMM (COMMON AFFORDABLE MULTIROLE MISSILE) CHINESE FL-3000, ALL BASED ON INFRARED SEEKER TECHNOLOGIES THAN TELL ME HOW RADAR GUIDED SAMs can intercept low flying targets

and IWANT A PROOFS OF YOUR CLAIMS NOT JUST YOUR WORDING LOL,

 

[Surya 1]

Yeah yeah whatever why not one brave Indian solider killed 100,000 PLA soldier with its bare hands lol we know you propaganda machine very well, and your own media telling you that Chinese capture 1000 sq km of your claim land, get some shame

And what about their supersonic cruise missile comparable to you mighty BRAHMOUSE such as YJ-12,

and i am want proof from you not just your wordings and most navies relying on short range SAMs to intercept low flying cruise missiles like ESSM (EVOLVED SEA SPARROW) RAM (ROLLING AIRFRAME MISSILE) SEA DART (UK) FUTURE CAMM (COMMON AFFORDABLE MULTIROLE MISSILE) CHINESE FL-3000, ALL BASED ON INFRARED SEEKER TECHNOLOGIES THAN TELL ME HOW RADAR GUIDED SAMs can intercept low flying targets

and IWANT A PROOFS OF YOUR CLAIMS NOT JUST YOUR WORDING LOL,

The proof is an article written by American think tank on Brahmos versis US Navy. You can find it out. It is on PDF itself