What's new

China’s new nuclear submarine missiles expand range in US: analysts

then give me a list of all JL3 Tests?

so there is ZERO test to validate those systems

so they are basically floating junks to show youtube videos for domestic consumption
Sir you (USA/UK) have lots of experience to design and develop SLBM, and China is quite new on this field, so it take time to mature JL-3 or may be they have put JL-3 without any validations???
 
.
then give me a list of all JL3 Tests?

so there is ZERO test to validate those systems

so they are basically floating junks to show youtube videos for domestic consumption
Chinese nuclear forces in 2020 for reference.

Chinese-nuclear-forces-2020.png



JL-3 SLBM is under development and/or undergoing trials.


"The missile is expected to enter service alongside China’s new class of ballistic missile submarines, the Type 096, in the late 2020s."

 
.
Chinese nuclear forces in 2020 for reference.

Chinese-nuclear-forces-2020.png



JL-3 SLBM is under development and/or undergoing trials.


"The missile is expected to enter service alongside China’s new class of ballistic missile submarines, the Type 096, in the late 2020s."

Slayer will console themselves as this report is fake by USDod to ask for more funds. China missile tech is only 50s tech child play. :enjoy:
 
.
Slayer will console themselves as this report is fake by USDod to ask for more funds. China missile tech is only 50s tech child play. :enjoy:


ok so only 1 test?

so I am correct when I said the JL3 is not validated

no wonder then why China doesn't conduct deterrence patrols

Trident has done 178th test since 1989 and is updated and validated every year since then

 
.
ok so only 1 test?

so I am correct when I said the JL3 is not validated

no wonder then why China doesn't conduct deterrence patrols

Trident has done 178th test since 1989 and is updated and validated every year since then

LOL! See that, I have prove all the pointed needed. You want to be an ostrich and lived in denial. Go ahead, I cant stop you. Dont cry hard when nuclear bomb strike you and end of world coming becos fools from western society think they can nuke China without suffer retaliation and bring the world to the end. :enjoy:
 
.
LOL! See that, I have prove all the pointed needed. You want to be an ostrich and lived in denial. Go ahead, I cant stop you. Dont cry hard when nuclear bomb strike you and end of world coming becos fools from western society think they can nuke China without suffer retaliation and bring the world to the end. :enjoy:

so only 1 JL3 test ?

that doesnt validated a nuclear missiles

only for youtube domestic consumption maybe
 
.
Chinese nuclear forces in 2020 for reference.

Chinese-nuclear-forces-2020.png



JL-3 SLBM is under development and/or undergoing trials.


"The missile is expected to enter service alongside China’s new class of ballistic missile submarines, the Type 096, in the late 2020s."

J-20 was expected to enter service in the late 2050s too.
so only 1 JL3 test ?

that doesnt validated a nuclear missiles

only for youtube domestic consumption maybe
Only when it airbursts over your city will you agree it is validated.
 
.
Is there any plan in China to increase the nuclear stockpile to the level of Russia or USA?
 
. .
Yes. We already have more than 1000 deployed nuclear warheads.
some people nowadays still insist on repeating the myth that China only has like a total of 400 nukes or something.
The SSBNs alone would have like 300-400 or more warheads (not all SSBNs would be deployed all the time) , and ofcourse the PLA would have a much larger number of ICBMs in land than at the sea, so at this point it is safe to say the number of strategic warheads exceeded the 1000 mark, that is not to mention the tactical nukes which are probably much more than that.
 
.
It is a reminder to US not to threaten China with nuclear weapon becos China also has the abilities to wipe US off the map too.

DF-41 ICBM hide inside deep bunker that can survive first nuclear strike. Type094A SSBN lurking around well protected SCS to retaliate US if China suffer first strike. If US really think their THAAD or SM-3 are some magical defense protect them from China nuclear missile strike. They are absolutely wrong.

Why would we threaten you with a nuclear attack first? You have no chance against us in a conventional war, lol. Hell, you can't even win Taiwan. Do you want to take the US, let alone NATO, on conventionally? Your one-child conscript army has a history of throwing bodies at a fight and suffering massive losses.
 
.
Why would we threaten you with a nuclear attack first? You have no chance against us in a conventional war, lol. Hell, you can't even win Taiwan. Do you want to take the US, let alone NATO, on conventionally? Your one-child conscript army has a history of throwing bodies at a fight and suffering massive losses.
Right, ask the US soldiers in korea war and the loser mac donald general who threaten to nuke China when his elite US army were beaten back. :lol:
 
.
Right, ask the US soldiers in korea war and the loser mac donald general who threaten to nuke China when his elite US army were beaten back. :lol:

We took half the country, halfway around the world, and your military could not get it back for N Koreans.

Why should we ask anyone when the proof is in front of us? We know you lost 2-3X more soldiers when you went up against us.

We know a tiny country like Japan whopped your boys and inflicted larger military casualties, and so did Vietnam. You always take huge casualties when you fight because you throw bodies at it.

Hell, had it not been for us taking on Japan, your national flag would have been the rising sun! :sarcastic:
 
Last edited:
.
China’s nuclear arsenal is growing rapidly. Well done to the CPC.
 
.
We took half the country, halfway around the world, and your military could not get it back for N Koreans.

Why should we ask anyone when the proof is in front of us? We know you lost 2-3X more soldiers when you went up against us.

We know a tiny country like Japan whopped your boys and inflicted larger military casualties, and so did Vietnam. You always take huge casualties when you fight because your soldiers are weak, and you throw bodies at it.

Hell, had it not been for us taking on Japan, your national flag would have been the rising sun! :sarcastic:
Lol... Why didn't u mention u failed the take the half for south? I thought US is strong?

Don't tell me mac donald general threaten China with nuke is faked. This is well documented. He loses the conventional war and suggest to use nuke. :enjoy: If throwing bodies can win war, why didn't Japan won against WWII with their mass banzai charge?
Chinese won smartly and beat US with great tactics.

If without US, Russia and CPC will have swept the whole China and help CPC established in 1945 rather than waited another 4 years.

The american and british need to thank Russia for taking out bulk of Nazi elite to make their life easier winning WWII.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom