What's new

China's Monroe Doctrine: Exceeding Gen. John J. Pershing in result | NYT

Martian2

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
5,809
Reaction score
-37
Beijing Flaunts Cross-Border Clout in Search for Drug Lord | The New York Times

"Beijing Flaunts Cross-Border Clout in Search for Drug Lord
By JANE PERLEZ and BREE FENG
Published: April 4, 2013

cp1Y24v.jpg

Liu Yuejin, an antinarcotics official in China, coordinated the search for Naw Kham, a drug lord, across Laos, Myanmar and Thailand. (Adam Dean for The New York Times)

Security officials from Laos arrested the trafficker, Naw Kham, but the international manhunt that led to his capture was organized in Beijing, by top Chinese government officials intent on making him pay for the killings of 13 Chinese seamen on the river, which has become a major trade route into China.

The bodies of the Chinese, the crew of two cargo boats, were found badly mutilated on the Thai side of the river in early October 2011. The killings, the worst slaughter of Chinese citizens abroad in recent memory, angered the Chinese public. Chinese investigators insist that Mr. Naw Kham was the mastermind of the murders.

China’s search for Mr. Naw Kham, overseen by its powerful Ministry of Public Security, was a hard-nosed display of the government’s political and economic clout across Laos, Myanmar and Thailand, the three countries of Southeast Asia that form the Golden Triangle. The capture shows how China’s law enforcement tentacles reach far beyond its borders into a region now drawn by investment and trade into China’s orbit, and where the United States’ influence is being challenged.

wfxPZy2.jpg

China executed Naw Kham in March. (China Daily, via Reuters)

It took six months for China to catch Mr. Naw Kham, a citizen of Myanmar in his 40s, a man of many aliases who was at the center of the booming synthetic drug business in the Golden Triangle, once known for its opium.

What came next was quick: the authorities flew the drug lord from Laos to China, tried him in a provincial court and executed him last month in a highly publicized live television broadcast that captured the proceedings until just moments before he received a lethal injection.

The Chinese hunt for Mr. Naw Kham was methodical and unyielding.

Immediately after the killings of the sailors, the Chinese government invited senior officials from the three countries that form the Golden Triangle to Beijing.

There, it pressured the countries to participate in Chinese-led river patrols, intended to ensure security for the river trade. Meng Jianzhu, who was China’s minister for public security, flew to Myanmar to meet with President Thein Sein, and Wen Jiabao, then China’s prime minister, spoke by telephone to his Thai counterpart, Yingluck Shinawatra, to urge her cooperation.

It fell to Liu Yuejin, leader of the antinarcotics bureau of the Ministry of Public Security, to coordinate the three-country search. Like the F.B.I., the ministry operates more than 20 liaison offices in places around the world, including the United States.

Mr. Liu took up temporary headquarters at Guan Lei, on the Mekong River in southern Yunnan Province, and sent Chinese officers to the three capitals to work as liaisons with local officials. He was in touch with these officers every day, Mr. Liu said.

Mr. Naw Kham proved to be a formidable target.

He had operatives within the Burmese and Thai armies and the Laotian security forces, according to an Asian official who works in the Golden Triangle and who spoke of the delicate case on the condition of anonymity. To counter Mr. Naw Kham’s web of protection, China was able to rely on contacts developed over the past decade from the training of more than 1,500 police officers in Southeast Asia, the official said.

China also had an array of informers — “flip-flops,” the official said — from among the increasing number of Chinese petty traders and businessmen in the region.

“He had his people, we had our people,” acknowledged Mr. Liu in a rare interview with a foreign reporter in his office in Beijing.

The Chinese were so intent on catching up with Mr. Naw Kham that security forces considered using a drone to kill him.

The drone idea was eventually abandoned even as Mr. Naw Kham outfoxed his pursuers in Myanmar’s mountainous jungles, said Mr. Liu, a precise man with a photograph of himself at a Mao heritage site on his office wall.

The Chinese news media reported that Mr. Liu’s superiors had ordered that Mr. Naw Kham be captured alive. Mr. Liu, whose antinarcotics bureau runs a fleet of unarmed drones for surveillance in China’s border areas, insisted that the idea was shelved because of legal restraints.

“China using unmanned aircraft would have met with problems,” he said. “My initial reaction was that this was not realistic because this relates to international and sovereignty issues.”

But China had another asset, on the ground. In northern Laos, 10 miles south of where Mr. Naw Kham would eventually be arrested, a lavish Chinese-owned casino called the Kings Roman, decorated with statues of larger-than-life Roman figures and a huge crown affixed to its roof, operates in a special economic zone run by Chinese businessmen on the edge of the Mekong.

The complex feels like a Chinese enclave: street signs are in Chinese, and Chinese currency, the renminbi, is favored over the Laotian kip. The casino offers stretch limousines for its customers, and a caged tiger to pet. It maintains its own Chinese security force, which probably played a role in the search for Mr. Naw Kham, the Asian official said.

In the beginning, the Chinese had no idea of Mr. Naw Kham’s whereabouts, and did not know on which side of the river he was hiding, Mr. Liu said. Gradually, they began picking up his tracks.

In December 2011, they learned he was in northern Laos. “Naw Kham had many friends, including in the local police,” Mr. Liu said. “His friends would alert him and protect him, and local officials would delay operations by leading us down the wrong road, literally.”

With the help of his supporters in Laos, Mr. Naw Kham evaded the Chinese and at night escaped across the river to Myanmar. “Under Lao norms, law enforcement activity is not done after dark,” Mr. Liu said wryly.

Once back in Myanmar, Mr. Naw Kham shuttled between hiding places in the mountains around the district of Tachilek, a center for the manufacture of methamphetamine. The factory-made drug has overtaken opium as the most lucrative product in the Golden Triangle, and antinarcotics officials say it was central to Mr. Naw Kham’s empire.

One of the links between Mr. Naw Kham and the two boats with the 13 Chinese seamen involved 920,000 methamphetamine pills, with an estimated value of $6 million, on board, according to the Thai police.

The Chinese authorities say the drugs were planted on the boats. Some Thai authorities contend that Mr. Naw Kham knew the boats were laden with drugs and sent his men to punish the crews for not paying protection money as they sailed from China into Thai waters.

Other Thai officials say that nine members of an elite Thai military unit were also involved in the killings of the Chinese seamen. Mr. Liu said that he agreed with that assessment, and that the nine Thai soldiers should be prosecuted.

The factories for making the methamphetamine pills are hidden throughout the mountainous terrain of Shan State in Myanmar, an area Mr. Naw Kham knew instinctively, Mr. Liu said.

In February and March 2012, the Chinese investigators missed him twice. But each time the Chinese closed in, they swept up supporters, increasing the chances they would flush him out, Mr. Liu said.

“There were gunfights where people were captured or killed, others were frightened off, and so he had fewer and fewer people around him,” Mr. Liu said.

As Mr. Naw Kham’s security net evaporated in Myanmar, the Chinese learned that he planned to escape across the Mekong River to Laos in a small boat, Mr. Liu said. The Laotians were alerted. “This time we didn’t have to persuade the Lao to act,” he said.

Mr. Naw Kham landed on the muddy banks with two associates. The Laotian police captured him as he tried to flee, Mr. Liu said.

Mr. Liu denied having his own men on the spot, but it was almost certain that Chinese agents were on hand, the Asian official said.

For China, the arrest was a substantial victory, said Paul Chambers, director of research at the Institute of South East Asian Affairs at Chiang Mai University in Thailand, and an author of the book “Cashing In Across the Golden Triangle.”

“The capture of Naw Kham sends a message that no group or state is going to be allowed to mess around with China on the Mekong River,” Mr. Chambers said. “Everyone now knows the top dog on the Mekong is China.”

In some ways, China’s operation to scoop up the drug lord echoed Gen. John J. Pershing’s endeavor to capture Pancho Villa, the Mexican revolutionary leader who in 1916 killed 18 Americans in New Mexico, Mr. Chambers said.

At the time, President Woodrow Wilson wanted to demonstrate that under the Monroe Doctrine, the United States was the power in Mexico, and that a popular folk hero would not be permitted to challenge it.

“China has its own Monroe Doctrine in the region, and this is the Pancho Villa case of the Mekong,” Mr. Chambers said.

But there were two distinctions.

'No. 1, the Chinese caught Naw Kham,' Mr. Chambers said, alluding to Pancho Villa’s skill in dodging General Pershing’s army. 'And No. 2, for smart diplomacy, they gave the credit to Laos.'
"
 
mekong is our backyard, our natural sphere of influence. amerikkans can contest it, but the cost calculation isn't in its favor. in fact, this is the essence of sphere of influence: that in one particular place one particular power can bring its forces to bear on the local situations far more efficiently, economically, and effectively than any other power or any other powers combined. that is the essence of the monroe doctrine, and that has been the iron law of geopolitics in east asia for thousands of years.

we don't know this kind of shitty, hypocritical, sour, and bitter reporting from new york times to tell us such self evident truths in international affairs.
 
mekong is our backyard, our natural sphere of influence. amerikkans can contest it, but the cost c...
do you live on the Moon? Mekong river is NOT your backyard. Yours ends at China´s border.
MekongMap.jpg
 
mekong is our backyard, our natural sphere of influence. amerikkans can contest it, but the cost calculation isn't in its favor. in fact, this is the essence of sphere of influence: that in one particular place one particular power can bring its forces to bear on the local situations far more efficiently, economically, and effectively than any other power or any other powers combined. that is the essence of the monroe doctrine, and that has been the iron law of geopolitics in east asia for thousands of years.

we don't know this kind of shitty, hypocritical, sour, and bitter reporting from new york times to tell us such self evident truths in international affairs.

It sounds like you are the bitter one.
 
Chinese Monroe doctrine ends with Japan. End of story, no matter how some members try to spin it.
And belligerent attitude will only help in pushing the countries sorrounding the Mekong closer in alliance with them and the great devil across the Pacific.

Though, i do understand the need to bring a murderer to trial and how CCP plays this in domestic media for internal consumption.
 
Chinese Monroe doctrine ends with Japan. End of story, no matter how some members try to spin it.
And belligerent attitude will only help in pushing the countries sorrounding the Mekong closer in alliance with them and the great devil across the Pacific.

Though, i do understand the need to bring a murderer to trial and how CCP plays this in domestic media for internal consumption.

hahaha, did the americas resist the us? did the europe come to their aide? do you understand what a sphere of influence is? in one particular place one particular power can bring its forces to bear on the local situations far more efficiently, economically, and effectively than any other power or any other powers combined. all the italian states together couldn't resist imperial domination for hundreds of years despite many, many attempts of french help; all the baltic and danubian states together couldn't resist russian domination for hundreds of years despite many, many attempts of franco-british help; all the americas together couldn't resist angloamerican domination for the last hundred years and it is still ongoing; and china knew how to effect a sphere of influence for much longer than anyone else and is helping viets, bonzi and nipponzi to relearn their place in a chinese sphere of influence that is our birthright. if an alliance between themselves or with the anglosaxons could change that, it wouldn't have been our birthright in the first place. just because you guys never got a taste of it in the subcontinent doesn't mean this is the iron law of the rest of the world - stupid yindoos...
 
Where is mekong's source and who has the absolute control of it??? I suppose you are not in the moon, right?
From the Tibetan Plateau. What do you have in mind?
 
If China is smart, it should condemn the Monroe doctrine in all its shapes and forms. This articled is used to portrait China as a hegemon in its southern border for arresting a drug Lord, which is not so. I support China for getting rid of pests of the world, and doing so its not equivalent of invoking its own Monroe doctrine.
 
Naw Kham - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sai Naw Kham (8 November 1969 – 1 March 2013) was the leader of a major drug trafficking gang in the Golden Triangle, a major drugs-smuggling area where the borders of Burma, Laos and Thailand converge.

Biography

Naw Kham was formerly a subordinate associate of Khun Sa, a major Burmese drug lord who surrendered to the Burmese government in 1996 in exchange for amnesty.[1] Naw's gang numbered in the hundreds and included members of Khun Sa's former paramilitary forces, along with ethnic rebels.[1] On 21 September 2012, Naw Kham pled guilty at the Intermediate People's Court in Kunming, Yunnan[2] to the murders of thirteen Chinese sailors killed during the Mekong River massacre. He and three of his subordinates were sentenced to death. On 26 December 2012, the Yunnan Higher Court rejected Naw Kham's appeals, upholding the death penalties.[3]

At its height, Naw Kham's militia, the Hawngleuk Militia (a Burmese people's militia force) had 100 members and was based out of Tachileik, near the Thai-Burmese border.[4] The militia was involved in trafficking of methamphetamine and heroin, kidnapping, murder, racketeering, and banditry in the Mekong River area.[4] Over the years, Naw Kham generated an estimated US$63 million in income through his crimes.[4] After the Mekong River massacre in October 2011 and subsequent backlash from the Chinese, Laotian officials arrested Naw Kham and extradited him to China on 10 May 2012.[5] Then in the July 2012 raids of Naw Kham's militia bases, Burmese authorities seized over 600,000 methamphetamine pills and 120 bars of heroin.[5] Hunting for Naw Kham, the Chinese "special task group" has used new technologies such as the Beidou System according to the Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China. Because the gang's remote hiding area is difficult to reach, even a UAV "execution operation" was once proposed.[6]

Naw Kham was executed by lethal injection in Kunming on 1 March 2013 together with his three subordinates: Hsang Kham from Thailand; Yi Lai, stateless; and Zha Xika, a Laotian.[7][8][9]Another 2 members of Naw Kham's gang, identified as Zha Bo and Zha Tuobo, received a death sentence with reprieve and 8 years in prison, respectively.
 
China should not follow the monroe-doctrine. It has the image of not interfering in other nation's affairs and it should keep that image. Chinese non-intervention policy has already helped to spread it clout and won the heart and minds of many nations. S.asian countries are a good case example of chinese soft power. Chinese doctrine should be based on mutual interest respect between China, its neighbors, ally and partner nations which will naturally help it to extend its clout even in military terms. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom