What's new

China's Good move on Diaoyu Islands

Fanling Monk

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
1,660
Reaction score
0
China's Good move on Diaoyu Islands 釣魚台群島


Since Japan "purchased" China's Diaoyu Islands in September, the Chinese government has taken a series of countermeasures in the economic, legal, diplomatic and military fields, which have helped it to wrest the initiative to resolve the islands dispute.

First, despite China not imposing any economic sanctions, the Japanese economy has been badly hit. The spontaneous anti-Japanese demonstrations in China, the cancellation of visits by Chinese nationals to Japan, and boycott of seminars held by business groups, the media and think tanks have dealt a blow to the Japanese economy. The Daily Yomiuri has reported: "Japan's exports to China have fallen for four consecutive months since June. Previously, declines in exports to China had been explained as part of a chain reaction triggered by falling Chinese exports. Trade statistics for September, however, showed Japanese exports to China plummeted by as much as 14.1 percent from the same month last year, with automobiles down as much as 44.5 percent."

In fact, an increasing number of Japanese media outlets have begun saying that improving ties with China is crucial to Japan's trade balance in the days ahead.

Second, China has completed the legal formalities to safeguard its territorial sovereignty and maritime interests. The announcement of the baselines of the territorial waters of the Diaoyu Islands provides the legal basis for China's jurisdiction over the islands and the surrounding waters in line with domestic and international laws.

In accordance with international law, China submitted a copy of the table of coordinates and charts of the Diaoyu Island and its affiliated islets to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. It has also completed the legal process regarding the announcement of the base points and baselines of the territorial waters of the Diaoyu Islands. These are important steps toward making it clear to the international community that China has indisputable sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands.

Besides, the State Oceanic Administration has taken measures to select and protect areas as the base points of China's territorial sea, which will strengthen the monitoring and evaluation of the protective range. Also, it will enable sea-surveillance institutions at all levels to supervise and monitor the entire protective range and safeguard China's maritime rights and interests.

Third, China has used its diplomatic channels to make it clear to the international community that it wants to resolve the Diaoyu Islands dispute with Japan through diplomatic negotiations. China's State leaders, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and other government agencies and civil organizations have declared time and again that the so-called nationalization of the Diaoyu Islands by Japan is illegal and China will "make no concession" on issues concerning its sovereignty and territorial integrity.

These steps, as important as they are, will let people in other countries, including Japanese nationals, know how firm China is in safeguarding its territorial sovereignty and maritime interests. They will also send out a clear message that the Diaoyu Islands are an integral part of China's territory.

Fourth, China has taken comprehensive, three-dimensional countermeasures to seize back the initiative in the islands dispute. The SOA has started monitoring the Diaoyu Islands and its surrounding waters, and begun forecasting the weather in and around them. The Chinese government has also started sending regular fishing and surveillance ships to patrol the waters around the Diaoyu Islands to enforce maritime law. Moreover, Chinese navy vessels have carried out routine joint training and navigation activities with fishing and surveillance ships in the East China Sea.

Fifth, China has not only canceled many activities to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the normalization of its diplomatic relations with Japan and called off high-level governmental and military reciprocal visits, but also boycotted a series of international conferences and cultural activities in Japan, showing its determination to safeguard national sovereignty and territory.

Of course, territorial disputes between two countries cannot be solved in a short time. But Japan's decision to "nationalize" the Diaoyu Islands challenges China's determination to defend its territory. The Japanese have also refused to "put aside disputes" to concentrate on areas in which the two countries agree. So to end Japan's "actual control" over the Diaoyu Islands and to make the international community fully aware of the facts, China needs to pay attention to three factors.

One, the Diaoyu Islands dispute is a contest of the comprehensive strengths of China and Japan. Whether Sino-Japanese relations will continue to deteriorate depends on whether Japan stops its provocative actions.

But it seems Japan will not change its current tendency and, hence, the islands dispute will continue to be a stumbling block in Sino-Japanese ties for some time to come.

Also, the unstable nature of Japan's domestic politics, the attitudes of different Japanese political forces toward China and their policies toward the Diaoyu Islands remain volatile. Therefore, China should prepare itself strategically and economically for the consequences.

Good move on Diaoyu Islands - People's Daily Online


For the meantime a bipartisan team of eastern affair specialists from the US: Richard Armitage, Stephen Hadley, James Steinberg and Joseph Nye are in Tokyo and Beijing to put out fire and talk on Japan's behalf.

Is Obama's 'Asia pivot' failing?

Asia Times Online :: US learns hard lessons of Asia 'pivot'
 
.
USA forgot the spanking we gave them in 1951. So they asked for more.

After 10 years of Hu / Wen, they thought we were weak. Fortunately, Supreme Leader Xi is here to save China from our enemies.
 
. .
Asia Times Online :: China News, China Business News, Taiwan and Hong Kong News and Business.
"Despite its call for a peaceful resolution to the [Diaoyu] islands row, Japan spared no efforts during Japanese Foreign Minister Koichiro Gemba's visits to France, Britain and Germany last week to argue in favor of its claim to the islands. But those on the trips only received a cold response when they brought up the dispute, reported Japanese newspaper Mainichi Shimbun, saying that none of the three countries visited has taken a position in the matter. When asked whether support was obtained during the trip, Gemba did not respond directly, only saying that each of the three parties is in a different situation and no details about the matter can be disclosed, Kyodo reported.

Kyodo said Gemba had high expectations for the tour but found it hard to obtain support in the countries he visited.

Meanwhile, Tokyo has started to turn to Moscow. During a meeting between Japan and Russia in Tokyo on Friday, the Japanese asked that Russia show understanding toward Japan's stance on the Diaoyu Islands.

Japanese newspaper Sankei Shimbun said China's presence in the ocean is expanding and Japan and Russia have a "shared a belief about containing China"."

After failing to gain support from 3 most powerful countries in EU the Japanese are turning towards the Russians. This certainly comes as a surprise to many of us as they are also having disputes regarding the Kuril islands. Something tells me the Russians most likely will give Japan a cold response. Maybe Japan should knock on India's or Vietnam's door for support because you see cheerleaders from these 2 supa powa on PDF are on Japan's side.
 
.
Economic war alone is enough to devastate Japan.

Imports and exports as well as tourism between China and Japan have declined sharply in recent months. China have even restricted rare earth to Japan. They are now seeking for partners around Asia to sell them the same stuff China have been selling them for years at ridiculously low prices.

Sure, by moving away from the Chinese rare earth may seem like a good face saver, but they are only going to hurt themselves in the process. Those potential suppliers (India, Vietnam and Australia) will only be helping China in-directly by selling them at higher rates.

The South Koreans who is acquiring increased levels of rare earth from China will sooner or later be wiping the floor with Japan's share on the global market with similar cheaper products. The only thing Japan can do is to cut corners with their products to reduce cost or lower their profit margins. This is going to be a win for China, South Korea as well as the future suppliers of Japan's rare earth, but not so much for Japan.

Being vulnerable to natural disasters further cast a long shadow over its economic prospects.
 
.
I wonder why there is no Japanese here in the forum. Are they scared?
That is interesting to know how they see the dispute. Is boring just to hear the Chinese version.
 
.
I wonder why there is no Japanese here in the forum. Are they scared?
That is interesting to know how they see the dispute. Is boring just to hear the Chinese version.

the japanese version is :they got the island with their gunboats in 1895.
if you like this version,We can demo again:we will get hanoi with our tanks
 
.
After failing to gain support from 3 most powerful countries in EU the Japanese are turning towards the Russians. This certainly comes as a surprise to many of us as they are also having disputes regarding the Kuril islands. Something tells me the Russians most likely will give Japan a cold response. Maybe Japan should knock on India's or Vietnam's door for support because you see cheerleaders from these 2 supa powa on PDF are on Japan's side.


Oh surprise surprise...they indeed came and kocked on our door, as well as on India:

Defense chief to visit India to boost ties amid China rise | The Japan Times Online
 
.
the japanese version is :they got the island with their gunboats in 1895.
if you like this version,We can demo again:we will get hanoi with our tanks


PLS do not say that! why so aggressive?
If you haven´t noticed, Vietnam government officially does not take any side in the Sino-Japanese dispute.
 
.
Economic war alone is enough to devastate Japan.

Imports and exports as well as tourism between China and Japan have declined sharply in recent months. China have even restricted rare earth to Japan. They are now seeking for partners around Asia to sell them the same stuff China have been selling them for years at ridiculously low prices.

Sure, by moving away from the Chinese rare earth may seem like a good face saver, but they are only going to hurt themselves in the process. Those potential suppliers (India, Vietnam and Australia) will only be helping China in-directly by selling them at higher rates.

The South Koreans who is acquiring increased levels of rare earth from China will sooner or later be wiping the floor with Japan's share on the global market with similar cheaper products. The only thing Japan can do is to cut corners with their products to reduce cost or lower their profit margins. This is going to be a win for China, South Korea as well as the future suppliers of Japan's rare earth, but not so much for Japan.

Being vulnerable to natural disasters further cast a long shadow over its economic prospects.

China will win the dispute that's for sure
But dont both sides think economic warfare will not be good for the current world economy which is no dobut is in a very bad state
 
.
no aggressive.
This helps you determine what is right and what is wrong.
if you think we are right to occupied Hanoi,then japan is right too.
According to the logic of the Japanese,not only Diaoyu but also Taiwan and Liaodong Peninsula are all theirs.now only diaoyu is under there control,it is time end .
 
.
Have I ever said China is wrong and Japan is right?
You don´t need to accept other opinions, but may learn just to argue, and not steadily threat other.

Control your mood!
 
.
Oh surprise surprise...they indeed came and kocked on our door, as well as on India:

Defense chief to visit India to boost ties amid China rise | The Japan Times Online

When i'm talking about support i mean picking side which is what Japan has been trying to do in EU and now in Russia. Now you say Vietnamese government officially doesn't pick any side in the sino-japanese dispute so what's the point posting a link about boosting military ties between India and Japan? That's what US have been doing so far holding military drills and yet they officially don't make a statement that the disputed islands belong to Japan.
 
.
When i'm talking about support i mean picking side which is what Japan has been trying to do in EU and now in Russia.

Now you say Vietnamese government officially doesn't pick any side in the sino-japanese dispute so what's the point posting a link about boosting military ties between India and Japan? That's what US have been doing so far holding military drills and yet they officially don't make a statement that the disputed islands belong to Japan.



My respond was due to your provocation (post #4). Take it easy.

I find the Japanese can learn some diplomacy from us. You see we receive support from France and other Europeans in the SCS dispute. :rofl:

Vietnam latest news - Thanh Nien Daily | European experts suggest international arbitration for East Sea dispute
 
.
Eh i don't see how post #4 is provocative but then again you are quite a weirdo yourself.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom