Viva_Viet
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2011
- Messages
- 7,503
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
If u think u r right, then just keep your own idea (game of leverage) and respect my idea (Xi surrender to Trump and beg for negotiation). Keep waiting to see what will happen after 90 days and what will happen in 2023 and stop insulting each other on internet cos I can not win 5cent armyWow, resorting to insults are we? =). Ppl see? Or you see? As I already explained why is there a need for 90 days? What did was the agreement? Anything signed? Can you provide a source to show what was agreed upon? The game of politics among superpowers is not just a simple I instruct you to do this, you must do this. It is all about 'interests'. What can one offer in exchange for something. You also fail to take notice of the 1 trillionUS$ US bond China is holding. The moment someone is naughty, China can cause havoc. =). It's a game of leverage. CHIMERICA! hahahaha
Nixon made mistake, he thought CN can help US to stop N.VN, but he was wrong, CN was not, so CN is useless to him, His visit was just a mistake, VN kick US out and get back S.VN in 1975.You still don't get it, if it was a WIN LOSE deal, why would someone agree to it? In exchange of recognizing PRC as the legitimate China and giving China the permanent UN security seat. ROC was already being sold out. The agreement with PRC was that Taiwan will be reunited peacefully instead of forcefully, hence the Chiang lobby got a breather in this regard. Taiwan was maintained as a leverage, a card to play in the future as can be seen now. If Nixon didn't need 'useless' China, why the heck he came begging on our doorsteps for an alliance? Common sense my friend, common sense. US needed China to stop helping Vietcongs, and instead attack these ungrateful Vietcong after the Sino-Soviet split. We went in, and taught Viets a good lesson, scorch the earth and returned back, while Viet monkeys hiding in the forest claimed victory after we returned home. Funny how you guys didn't defend against us in the first place.
Abt "teaching a lesson"We discussed who won , who lost in 1979 war many times here already. CN failed to force VN to pull our troops out of Cambodia, PLA with support from US's spy bird (cos PLAF suck, dare not fight over VN sky to collect Intel so Deng had to beg for help from US's spy bird) only had to fight wt VN border guard and militia forces, but still had to retreat.
why weren't us defending your cities? then why didnt u read the history carefully ?? After 1975, VN population was 40 million, minus 15 million follow US in VN war, then VN only had abt 25million ppl (4 million disabled person). in 1979 there were abt 600,000 Active personnel, while abt 300,000-350,000 soldiers had to fight in Cambodia and Laos to save Camb from Pol Pot massarce. Thats why when CN attack VN, we didnt have enough regular soldiers to fight and mainly used our border guard and militia forces, but still forced PLA to retreat before our regular army can come back from Laos-Camb.You have such a simplistic mind, I told you we learn, copy, improvise, absorb and improve upon others. PRC is providing good governance compared to many 'democratic' countries, one good example is our neighbor to the south. Will the people demand more? Of course? They will have to change and adapt as always, provide better feedback solutions, accountability, you will be shocked how meritocratic China is compared to 'democratic' India.
Get back HK-Nanjing? What the f does that even mean dude? TRONK? We are cowards? You are the ones hiding in the forest like monkeys, why weren't you defending your cities? Sure you could claim it was guerilla tactics, but why resort to that when you are so brave? ahahahhaha
Hell, China was poor back then, but times change, countries change. The fact you tell me this makes me even prouder on how far we have come.
And let talk abt 2014 conflict again to show that CNese is very coward. CN even used CNese navy while VN still use coast guard only. CN number of ships r triple than VN, but finally CN still had to retreat to avoid another shamefull loss to VN
------------------
Result China temporarily withdrew the oil rig
Belligerents
- Chinese Navy
- China National Offshore Oil Corporation
- China Maritime Safety Administration
- China Coast Guard
- China Fisheries Law Enforcement Command
- Civilian and fishing boats
- Vietnam Coast Guard
- Vietnam Fisheries Resources Surveillance
- Civilian and fishing boats
CN: 1 drilling platform, 6 warships, 40 coast guard vessels, over 30 transport ships and tugboats, 34-40 ironclad fishing boats, Su-27[citation needed] andShaanxi Y-8 patrol planes[1]
VN: 60 vessels: coast guard, fisheries surveillance and and wooden fishing boat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hai_Yang_Shi_You_981_standoff
Wait till 2023, my friend, CN always lose when fighting alone against US (1958 TW conflict is a clear exmple, thousand Cnese killed, Zero US troop lost, CN is scared to death and dare not pick a fight wt US till now )China Economy: Volume of trade in services up 11.1%
***
My friend, @Viva_Viet , China's exports in services is growing faster than its imports in services.
Looks like China is working harder to balance its deficit-prone trade in services.
Isn't that a sign of good economic management, especially given that we are in the midst of an economic warfare?