Hey are you sure if its real? Or something created through cinematic effects by Chinese ministry of Propaganda?
RK
I know the failures of arjun and LCA are both real.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey are you sure if its real? Or something created through cinematic effects by Chinese ministry of Propaganda?
RK
correction Tibetan lands. Considering that Chinese didnt have a problem doing a genocide on the Tibetians, it wouldnt be a problem to kill a few Indians. Anyways more than a few Chinese met confucious in heaven in that war.
Atleast palestinians have the option to live seperately. Tibetans state is far worse than palestinians.
all major powers (US/UK/FR/DE/JP/KR/RUS/AUS/PAK/MAY....) and silly countries (India) recognize that Tibet is a part of China. you can keep trolling for years, no one listen to your crap.
for the status of Tibetans, ironically, their life expectancy is much higher than Indians, why? because the regime of India refuse to invest anything real on its own people.
New Recruit
hey, that is not about the McMahon Line, it is about your forwarding policy in which you tried to even go north of that line. That is - you claim the border to be the McMahon Line which we don't agree, then you cross that line and invaded my country.
1950 Indian Official map
1954 Indian official map
the regime of India thought they were strong enough to take lands away from China, they changed the border on their official map, deployed troops on Chinese lands, and they got rooted in a hard way.
for the McMahon Line, do you watch news or maybe such news is just illegal in India? that was a treaty now the British has officially apologized at the end of 2008. Read the following NYtimes article, the UK apologized on its anachronism and a colonial legacy which does include the Simla convention of 1914 which defined that "border line".
New York Times Article.
maybe your regime just refuse to report such recent news to your people to gain control and maintain the nationalism?
McMahon Line? We can send troops in, capture New Delhi and redefine the border of Sino-India. We can do that in days when necessary just like what did in 1962.
i haven't seen Chinese troops pass arunachal pradesh yet which u guys claim so rightfully yours dreaming of dinning in Delhi when u guys cant even take care of Vietnam and the border line was drawn with Tibet not china.
New Recruit
US have biggest force but US also find it to difficult to run yes India maybe not as strong as china but there wont be any Chinese tea party in Delhi soon. we have war experience with pakistan to our credit we still are intact so it not that easy my friend.But the topic is on road agreement and i already agreed that we are behind china in it so why the big fuss r u guys want say the mighty dragon is just going to eat us and we are on mercy of panda?India's actually quite lucky to have Nepal between china. If that wasn't the case, the Chinese ground troops would've already been there for the tea party in Delhi. With a force like China's, overrunning the enemy isn't a problem.
bezerk sir,
no offense to you or anybody here.
India is not a cup of tea. Chinese can never think of war with India now . cause its same case like India Pakistan , Pakistan have lost a lot already amidst this chaos. a war wont harm them as much it will kill the dream of India to be developed country some day. china will be gone back to 1920s with one war with India. Dont forget we Indian can fight till the last breath we have its not that babu generation of 1990s its the most confident generation of 2010( smiler to like the one you see in upstate area of lahore). a war in this modern age cant be won. battle might be won.
None taken. But you misunderstood my point. My point referred to the old days. If the border between India and China didn't had Nepal standing between them, 1962 could've been a decisive factor between the two nations for the COMING generations.
agreed completely . we would have been gone in 1962 because of poor leadership we had. Nepal and Himalayan range was one of the biggest factor to save India.
but as for india it was a wake up call . and it was very well needed.
all major powers (US/UK/FR/DE/JP/KR/RUS/AUS/PAK/MAY....) and silly countries (India) recognize that Tibet is a part of China. you can keep trolling for years, no one listen to your crap.
for the status of Tibetans, ironically, their life expectancy is much higher than Indians, why? because the regime of India refuse to invest anything real on its own people.
India's actually quite lucky to have Nepal between china. If that wasn't the case, the Chinese ground troops would've already been there for the tea party in Delhi. With a force like China's, overrunning the enemy isn't a problem.
I know. Chinese had tea in Japan also and went their along with comfort women. They have having tea in Taiwan also for last 60 years... Chinese tea..
RK
India's actually quite lucky to have Nepal between china. If that wasn't the case, the Chinese ground troops would've already been there for the tea party in Delhi. With a force like China's, overrunning the enemy isn't a problem.
bezerk sir,
no offense to you or anybody here.
India is not a cup of tea. Chinese can never think of war with India now . cause its same case like India Pakistan , Pakistan have lost a lot already amidst this chaos. a war wont harm them as much it will kill the dream of India to be developed country some day. china will be gone back to 1920s with one war with India. Dont forget we Indian can fight till the last breath we have its not that babu generation of 1990s its the most confident generation of 2010( smiler to like the one you see in upstate area of lahore). a war in this modern age cant be won. battle might be won.
Do Chinese really have authentic data? I am told they are the masters in cooking data in CPC offices. Who can beat Chinese in cheating after all. When world is learning, Chinese have already gone high teck..
China's civil service exam cheaters go high-tech - washingtonpost.com
RK