malllawcha
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 74
- Reaction score
- 0
China, U.S.: China gets in trouble when it overreaches - Los Angeles Times



i agree there r plenty silly chinese nationalist netizens, but they has nothing to do with china foreign policy. i personally believe US will still lead the way in my life time, in the coming 60 years.
how do the yankees define "something it had accepted in the past"???
we r not european, never ever put us with any european countries side by side, in this case, its germany. its would upset the german people, ¾«Æ·ÎÄÕª-Ç×ÀúµÂ¹úµçÊǪ́ϷŪÖйúÈË-ÖлªÍø²©¿Í chinese human right problems become laughing stock to the german audience
lately, toxic feed scandal in germany, german people believe chinese is responsible, only chinese would inferior enough to do that.
and after all we r east asian simply, why put us with the european countries side by side in the beginning.
what is "more assertive Chinese foreign policy"??? to defend diaoyu islands??? well, we dont want the japanese have their existence in our continental shelf, thats the only reason why we insist our sovereignty over the islands. they have already annex a independent country Ryukyu in 70s, take away all island above taiwan, triple their waters square, and its not enough for them, and we use governance ships to defend diaoyu islands is part of "more assertive Chinese foreign policy" by the yankees standard???
spratly islands, chinese vested interests, the islands always under chinese control, now chinese tiny neighbor claim them, any we become invader, doing "more assertive Chinese foreign policy"???



i agree there r plenty silly chinese nationalist netizens, but they has nothing to do with china foreign policy. i personally believe US will still lead the way in my life time, in the coming 60 years.
Last year, when China broke off military-to-military talks following the Obama administration's long-expected sale of defensive arms to Taiwan, a high American official asked his Chinese counterpart why China reacted so strongly to something it had accepted in the past. The answer: "Because we were weak then and now we are strong."
how do the yankees define "something it had accepted in the past"???
Some analysts go further and argue that China's rise will result in a clash similar to that between a rising Germany and a hegemonic Britain that led to World War I a century ago.
we r not european, never ever put us with any european countries side by side, in this case, its germany. its would upset the german people, ¾«Æ·ÎÄÕª-Ç×ÀúµÂ¹úµçÊǪ́ϷŪÖйúÈË-ÖлªÍø²©¿Í chinese human right problems become laughing stock to the german audience

lately, toxic feed scandal in germany, german people believe chinese is responsible, only chinese would inferior enough to do that.
and after all we r east asian simply, why put us with the european countries side by side in the beginning.

But many Chinese do not see the world this way. They believe that the recession of 2008 represented a shift in the balance of world power, and that China should be less deferential to a declining United States. This overconfident power assessment has contributed to a more assertive Chinese foreign policy in the last two years. The shift in perceptions seems to have emboldened the Chinese government, even though the judgment is wrong.
what is "more assertive Chinese foreign policy"??? to defend diaoyu islands??? well, we dont want the japanese have their existence in our continental shelf, thats the only reason why we insist our sovereignty over the islands. they have already annex a independent country Ryukyu in 70s, take away all island above taiwan, triple their waters square, and its not enough for them, and we use governance ships to defend diaoyu islands is part of "more assertive Chinese foreign policy" by the yankees standard???

spratly islands, chinese vested interests, the islands always under chinese control, now chinese tiny neighbor claim them, any we become invader, doing "more assertive Chinese foreign policy"???
