What's new

China trumping US leadership in Asia: Obama

I'm a direct descendant of Sun Tzu, the greatest military commander humanity has ever seen. :china:


lol.

if you are into this ancestral game, then i'm a direct descendant of Jiang Shang (Jiang Ziya), an ancient Chinese military strategist 500 years before your Sun Tzu. :coffee:
please stay in Canada. Northeast China could be a dangerous place for you, or any "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere" supporter.

You'll never know. Even in Korea, there are Koreans who , tho they have no japanese blood, are more ultranationalistic than even Japanese right wingers. For example, at a football game in Korea, a Korean unfurled a Rising Sun Flag.

lol, interesting and crazy, right ?

:lol:

56716621.1.jpg



PS. what do you call them?
汉奸 ?
 
.
First of all, the reason TPP only put 0.3 trillion into the region simply because the US have Free Trade agreement already in place in most of Asian powerhouse, including Singapore, Japan, South Korea, ROC,.India, the purposed TPP only literally targetting ASEAN country that are yet to join FTA with US. Hence the 0.3 trillion.added.

On the other hand, the China have not yet have FTA with India, Japan, South Korea....So an FTA for China in the region mean big money added to the Chinese account

Also no ine ever said you cant have both US and China in your FTA partner to any Asian Nation

thirdly, do not pull me into this argument and personal attack me for no particular reason, all post of personal attack have been reported and negative rated
 
.
lol.



You'll never know. Even in Korea, there are Koreans who , tho they have no japanese blood, are more ultranationalistic than even Japanese right wingers. For example, at a football game in Korea, a Korean unfurled a Rising Sun Flag.

lol, interesting and crazy, right ?

:lol:

View attachment 185811


PS. what do you call them?
汉奸 ?

nah, i sincerely doubt they have the guts or knowledge base to be qualified as real '奸'.:coffee: what harm could they possibly do to national interest by waving flags or trolling on internet? calling them '汉奸' would be too flattering considering their limited capabilities.
i'll simply call them '中二'.:lol::devil:
 
.
Domestic kudos for Obama, but foreign efforts trickier
Published: 2015-1-23


4a64cf71-99d6-4189-9d82-d5d2a1d398cc.jpeg

Illustration: Liu Rui/GT



US President Barack Obama made his penultimate State of the Union speech on Tuesday night. Facing a GOP-occupied Congress and counting his remaining two years in the Oval Office, Obama has shown unexpected assertiveness in both internal and external affairs, asserting his desire to "turn the page." The question is, will his blueprint for the rest of his tenure be simply a gesture or able to take real effects?

In retrospect, Obama's biggest source of pride in the past six years might be his efforts to put the US economy back on track and drag it out of the mire it was in in 2008. The US unemployment rate has dropped to 5.6 percent in 2014 from 9.3 percent when he took office. His efforts, his Robin Hood-style package of plans, such as raising taxes on wealthy US investments and financial institutions, implementing comprehensive healthcare system reform, and easing immigration restrictions, have won him favor from the middle class and ordinary people. That is probably why his approval rate has returned to over 50 percent lately.

Obama knows his advantages, and he keeps using economy-related advances to endorse his performance in the past years. In his speech, he has highlighted important topics, and even come up with some new catchy slogans such like "middle class economics." In short, Obama will continue on the path he has been on for six years.

Although he is believed to have entered the "lame duck" period much earlier along with the Democrats losing both Houses in last year's midterm elections, it is not the case that Obama can do nothing real before the 2016 presidential elections.

As for internal affairs, especially economic and social issues, Congress will think twice before they try to discourage the president's will, which to some extent is in tune with voters' desires. As for external affairs, Obama has the upper hand due to the US' recent rapprochement with Cuba, and his insistence on coming to terms with Iran over nuclear issues without further sanctions has put him on a moral high ground. That is why in order to play the last tune well, Obama will be more engaged in his undertakings regardless of Congress' constraints, though by wielding the veto pen.

Fruits could be borne from Obama's endeavors in domestic affairs, but some of his attempts to protect US interests overseas are probably not going to be smart moves. In his speech, he mentioned China three times, describing it as a competitive challenger who is eager to "write the rules for the world's fastest growing region."

Although the "pivot to Asia" was not mentioned in his speech, it doesn't mean Washington will reduce US influence in the region. It could be assumed that Obama's focus on the region in the next two years will aim to promote US-led trade deals with Asia in a bid to "level the playing field," where China has been regarded by the US as a rule-maker.

Obama's words have demonstrated that the US has recognized the fact that China is more like a rival on an equal footing than a chaser still falling behind. In 2014, China became the second country whose GDP had surpassed $1 trillion. The Trans-Pacific Partnership will be Obama's flagship policy, with which he wants the US to sustain its competitive advantage in the region and counterbalance China's growing economic clout. But Obama gives too much emphasis to the competitiveness of rule-making and ignores the potential cooperativeness involved.

Although it exceeded $500 billion in 2013, bilateral trade between China and the US still lacks effective channels of communication, which means there are no effective rules which are agreeable to both sides. Problems involving trade protectionism, intellectual property rights and the yuan's exchange rate keep haunting both countries. If the US' resolution is confined in extruding China's presence in the rule-making process, its unilaterally beneficial trade system will arouse more uncertainties.

Obama could do better in the following two years in expanding the US interests. But the first thing he has to do is to learn how to cooperate and compromise. He doesn't have to be a wheeler-dealer.

The article was compiled by Global Times reporter Liu Zhun based on an interview with Sun Zhe, director of the Center for US-China Relations at Tsinghua University. liuzhun@globaltimes.com.cn
 
.
First of all, the reason TPP only put 0.3 trillion into the region simply because the US have Free Trade agreement already in place in most of Asian powerhouse, including Singapore, Japan, South Korea, ROC,.India, the purposed TPP only literally targetting ASEAN country that are yet to join FTA with US. Hence the 0.3 trillion.added.

On the other hand, the China have not yet have FTA with India, Japan, South Korea....So an FTA for China in the region mean big money added to the Chinese account

Also no ine ever said you cant have both US and China in your FTA partner to any Asian Nation

thirdly, do not pull me into this argument and personal attack me for no particular reason, all post of personal attack have been reported and negative rated
It's not a personal attack but a true reflection of you and your dear US president Obama. US has no intention to share benefit with partner. What they want is to follow US command and things that will benefit US only.

lol.



You'll never know. Even in Korea, there are Koreans who , tho they have no japanese blood, are more ultranationalistic than even Japanese right wingers. For example, at a football game in Korea, a Korean unfurled a Rising Sun Flag.

lol, interesting and crazy, right ?

:lol:

View attachment 185811


PS. what do you call them?
汉奸 ?
That is a Japanese. You can see the nearby fans all wear Nippon jersey.
 
. .
Every American president wants to leave a legacy behind before handing the torch over to the next successor. Time is ticking for him and he wants to push TPP forward by giving Japan pressure. His China pivot strategy isn't materializing the way had wanted so right now he's trying to gain domestic support with aggressive speech (as always) by telling us the Asian region should be dictated under Obama's set of rules.
 
.
If Obama thinks he can beat China in Asia in terms of economic influence, boy, he is messing with the wrong country. China has the geographical advantage the US doesn't have in Asia. China not only has geographic advantage but also the advantage of scale.
 
.
If Obama thinks he can beat China in Asia in terms of economic influence, boy, he is messing with the wrong country. China has the geographical advantage the US doesn't have in Asia. China not only has geographic advantage but also the advantage of scale.

At least, he is smarter than those neocons.

The US right now is not under the good condition to engage China into an arm race, but the neocons couldn't understand that.

And I bet they would probably push the military expenditure up to 1 trillion.
 
. .
What `moral highground'? US exceptionism?

That's probably the very source of the belief that the US holds the moral high ground -- because it is exceptional.

That belief is all over the place if you read Obama's SoU speech. The guy sees the world black & white, like the previous "either with us, or with the terrorists."

GWB's economic version.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom