What's new

China To Support Only Harmless Sanctions against Iran

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
China To Support Only Harmless Sanctions against Iran

China does not intend to support radical sanctions against Iran that could stop its nuclear program, says the statement made on April 20th by Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu. She stated that Beijing insisted on a diplomatic solution of Iran’s nuclear issue, explaining that “dialogue and negotiations” are the most efficient methods.

"We have stated many times that the six countries launching the talks in New York does not mean that the door is shut to dialogue and negotiations," she said, referring to the six permanent Security Council members (Russia, USA, China, France, Great Britain and Germany) that discussed additional sanctions against Iran in New York on April 15.

The statement came as a shock to those who counted on serious changes in China’s position regarding the Iran issue. In the beginning of 2010 Beijing seemed to be prepared to soften its position of unwillingness to discuss a new package of anti-Iran sanctions.

In early April China agreed to make it the topic of negotiation of the six countries. Same happened to Russia whose position went through similar evolution. Dmitry Medvedev said in his address in Brooking Institute in Washington on April 14 that he could admit that the sanctions were inevitable.

It seemed that the sanctions were about to be introduced. Now it is clear that Beijing intends first and foremost to insist on diplomatic negotiations. Since it is a permanent member of the Security Council, introduction of sanctions is impossible without China’s approval.

It is worth mentioning that experts were skeptical earlier about the ability of the “six powers” to quickly come to an agreement on this matter. It is not ruled out that the acceptance of the resolution prepared by the UN Security Council may get delayed until June. In May Lebanon will be chairing the organization, and its leaders have stated their absolute disagreement with any anti-Iranian sanctions, which has to do with the great influence of Hezbollah in the country.

The US and other countries insist on quick introduction of additional sanctions against Iran to force it to refuse implementation of Iran nuclear program. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Feb. 11 that the first batch of 20% enriched uranium was produced, and that the country was able to get to even a greater level of enrichment. This was taken as another evidence of non-amicable nature of Iran’s nuclear program.

Has the current position of China ruined the hope for introduction of additional sanctions? If not, then how effective can they be? Pravda.ru interviewed experts Lana Ravandi-Fadai, Alexander Khramchikhin and Sergey Luzyanin to find out the answers.

Lana Ravandi-Fadai , an expert with the Institute of Eastern Studies:

“Considering the disagreements that Russia and China have with the West regarding the Iran issue, acceptance of really effective sanctions is not possible. Islamic Republic still remains their important economic partner, and these two countries have no attention to abandon this partnership.

But even if we imagine that Iran is banned from trading with other countries it will not stop its nuclear program which became a national idea. Teheran is prepared for the worst case scenario. It has significant resources to wait out even a complete blockade.

The statement of the Chinese representative about Beijing’s intentions to solve the issue diplomatically was not an accident. This is the way China lets us know that even if it does vote for the sanctions they would be completely harmless for Teheran. That is, they will be compromising, unable to influence it.”

Sergey Luzyanin, Deputy Director of the Institute of the Far East:

“China has been defending its position regarding Iran long and consistently. The position is that sanctions will not solve the issue but aggravate it. This position is not without logic.

Beijing addresses the point that no one was able to prove the military nature of the Iranian nuclear program, and peaceful development of atom is not banned. Additionally, a number of issues could be solved by International Atomic Energy Agency’s tests because Iran has not limited the access to its nuclear objects.

On the other hand, introduction of sanctions would close the access for diplomatic efforts. Of course, China is being pressured. Yet, it does not yield. In the event that the sanctions affecting China’s economic interests are attempted, it will simply veto them. In any event, this position is another proof that China positions itself as a world super power that does not intend to follow the American policy.”

Alexander Khramchikhin, Deputy Director of the Institute for Political and Military Analysis:

“The Iranian nuclear program can be stopped. It can happen only if Teheran’s oil sales program is obstructed, because this is how the nuclear program is financed. Yet, China that gets the black oil from Iran will not agree to it under any circumstances. At the same time it will not break the promises given to the world community. China will discuss the sanctions, but will not vote for them. There is another factor besides oil.

Lately, Iranian-Chinese military and technical cooperation has been developing. In particular, during the last parade held in Teheran the Persians showed contemporary air defense complexes that strongly resembled Russian S-300, allegedly designed by them. Most likely, they were made in China.

This is not only an economic issue. The geopolitical factor is very important. China is trying to promote its influence in the world and not without success. Special attention in China’s plans is given to the Middle East and its oil resources.

Beijing has no intentions of yielding them to anybody. That is why it will not directly reject introduction of the sanctions but will constantly delay the last word. I think that there are two possible options. Either Iran will gain access to nuclear weapons, or it can be stopped by the only existing force, Israel, that will strike.”

China To Support Only Harmless Sanctions against Iran - Pravda.Ru
 
We can read this claim like this, almost all sanctions are not harmless, so almost all sanctions are not supported by china.:blink:
 
Isn't Iran Middle East's last free country that is uninfluenced by the United States? Both the US and RF know that it will be China's end if Iran falls. It's obvious that China won't give in, lol... It's like asking America to give Alaska back to Russia, which is something that won't happen without a hot war.
 
Last edited:
Isn't Iran Middle East's last free country that is uninfluenced by the United States? Both the US and RF know that it will be China's end if Iran falls. It's obvious that China won't give in, lol... It's like asking America to give Alaska back to Russia; something that won't happen without a hot war.

Mark my words.......by not supporting effective sanctions. China is guaranteeing that a strike against Iran will definitely happen. It is simply a matter of time. And whether it's Israel or the U.S. and E.U. that strike first. My bet is on Israel unilaterally striking. Obama has no backbone to stand up to Iran without some prodding.
 
Mark my words.......by not supporting effective sanctions. China is guaranteeing that a strike against Iran will definitely happen. It is simply a matter of time. And whether it's Israel or the U.S. and E.U. that strike first. My bet is on Israel unilaterally striking. Obama has no backbone to stand up to Iran without some prodding.

It's not that Obama doesn't have the backbone to stand up to Iran, but the treasury, which has yet to recover from the bankruptcy and recession caused by the Second Gulf/Iraq War. Russia firmly opposes military action. Moreover, with Germany siding with Russia, it will be difficult for the EU to act. As for Israel, you're over exaggerating their capabilities. It isn't 1948, when Israel held stark technological superiority and was able to create a rift in the Arab alliance. It'll be different in the late 2010s, and 2020s, as rising powers such as China and India, will be able to provide substantial military support to neighbouring allies. The S-300/Chinese modified, anti-air missiles are a detrimental problem to Israeli air strikes, and it has been for quiet some time. That is why Israel pushes for F-22s, as F-35 lacks supercruise for deep pentetration and maneuverability for strategic strike missions. The cancellation of Lavi marked the end of Israeli technological superiority over most military powers, of course, with the exception of Phalcon. Israel is just not what it was in the 1990s. Recent conventional technology proliferation by Israel has angered the DoD in ways more than one. Even the press for anti-Iran sanctions were pushed by Israeli and Saudi lobbyists, not Americans, who are quite distanced from central Arab. You see all the media propaganda of Iranian nuclear terrorism? Well, many of them are done by Israelis who control the American media. I would read some European/non-French news about Iran if I were you. It's the Gulf Wars all over again. I hate Americans for that. Who has fought more wars in the past 2 decades? Who called for NPT after shipping blue prints to UK and Israel? Who "leads" world pacifism? It's simply hypocriticism and undisguised tyranny.
 
Last edited:
Mark my words.......by not supporting effective sanctions. China is guaranteeing that a strike against Iran will definitely happen. .
thats funny..that what we say doosray k kandahy per rakh ker bandook chalana...if china doesnt support leave her, impose ur sanctions with ur allies..after all who cares of SC

It is simply a matter of time.
let US get out from the ap-pak marsh first!!plz have mercy on ur unemployed..

And whether it's Israel or the U.S. and E.U. that strike first. My bet is on Israel unilaterally striking. Obama has no backbone to stand up to Iran without some prodding
i tell u it will b US backed Israel
 
Mark my words.......by not supporting effective sanctions. China is guaranteeing that a strike against Iran will definitely happen. It is simply a matter of time. And whether it's Israel or the U.S. and E.U. that strike first. My bet is on Israel unilaterally striking. Obama has no backbone to stand up to Iran without some prodding.

so if us will end up controlling iran then chinas making a smart choice in this case might as well bleed the Americans dry rather than to simply give it to them.
 
so if us will end up controlling iran then chinas making a smart choice in this case might as well bleed the Americans dry rather than to simply give it to them.

lol, it's China's money.....they keep buying our treasury bonds.
 
Back
Top Bottom