Mista
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2016
- Messages
- 4,567
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
I'm quite sure none of those islands have been independent or been brutally occupied by Japanese.
Why does it matter? Do they not fit the definition?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm quite sure none of those islands have been independent or been brutally occupied by Japanese.
I'm quite sure none of those islands have been independent or been brutally occupied by Japanese.
Most Latin American/Carribean countries were always middle income since the 19th century. They were the textbook examples of the middle income trap. Latin America was never poor the way South Korea or China were, but never left middle income either.I'm quite sure some of the Caribbean Islands listed were low income before the war. Many of them make their money on tourism...which was relatively non-existent before the War (unless the super rich few who were going there were keeping them afloat). Remember you pretty much have to fly there and commercial airline travel for the masses didn't really kick in until after the War.
SK has the highest suicide rate, the lowest birth rate among developed countries. The price is high.South Korea is moden slavery. Chaebo controls 90% of economy. People are brainwashed and sex cult are promoted to keep people content. In terms of material well being, Beijing and Shanghai is far far far better than Seoul.
South Korean have a higher salary but everything is expensive. Eventually South Korean enjoys nothing but works long hours.
Korean Chaebo companies sucks big time. Korean engineers have siege mentality and they do not share knowledge.
Most Latin American/Carribean countries were always middle income since the 19th century. They were the textbook examples of the middle income trap.
Latin America was never poor the way South Korea or China were, but never left middle income either.
Best example is Costa Rica, a good country. They don’t even have an army.I guess we should thank the white man for keeping most of South and Latin America middle income instead of low. I guess PDF should be giving us more credit...
I guess I should change my viewpoint on how lucky they are.. I always thought most of it was a pit. I guess I never knew what a pit really was.
Best example is Costa Rica, a good country. They don’t even have an army.
Why not it’s a win win.Yes they do...but unfortunately it's private ones run by drug cartels.
They do not. The conditions are follows. 1. The country must be a high income country now. 2. The country must be a country with low income at the end of WW2.Why does it matter? Do they not fit the definition?
they were not low income. Saudi Arabia was at least middle income since the 1930's when they sold oil exploration rights to US standard oil. UAE didn't exist until 1970's.What about UAE and other GCC nations?
They do not. The conditions are follows. 1. The country must be a high income country now. 2. The country must be a country with low income at the end of WW2.