Such a trivial intellectually bankrupt and false response was expected from you
Hence, there is a reason why I only quoted the below members for a response and not you -
Bang Galore
scorpionx
anonymus
However, to humor the Indian members here let me take the effort of educating you
For starters we are discussing about the Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee or the Committee where i quote:
The Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee
In other words the the so called exclusive "Veto" P-5 benefits are less effective here.
The only advantage P5 nations hold here is they remain on
every 1267 meeting, unlike like non-permanent members where India comes in.
Given the fact India has been part of the non-permanent member of UNSC multiple times in the part. Nothing holds back India from re-obtaining the membership and "stalling" any resolutions, on say Xinjaing in the future.
List of members of the United Nations Security Council - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Also, I advocate India stalling any resolutions associated to Xinjaing militants in the committee irrespective of Chinese support for any terrorists wanted in India.
Because, China's support for terrorists wanted in India is expected as it servers the traditional strategy of China to fight Indians to the last Pakistani, as believed by the Indian establishment.
Just as China previously stalled 1267 resolutions on LeT members thrice and attempted to prevent NSG waiver for India
The final result of both above acts are China finally kicked into submission
Hence, the result of current action is not a mystery
It is also important to point out China's unique case in this scenario.
Traditionally, if say USA were to support/ not care about a terrorist wanted in India, India would not care as eventually that terrorist group will kill American civilians, resulting American public outrage and prompting USA Govt to change its stance.
However, in China's case the above is not feasible . Assuming a Chinese tourist in India is slaughtered by Hizbul Mujahideen terrorist and say his body parts displayed as trophies (similar to what Imperial Japanese trooper did in Nanking)
Despite the above causing an uproar among the Chinese public, the same would
not make Chinese Govt change its stance given the inability of Chinese citizens to determine the future of the Govt, unlike in case of USA.
It was observed in Mumbai 2008 attacks, Two Singaporean citizens were killed assuming to Chinese citizens on record by terrorists of the same group China stalled thrice in 1267 meetings.
More interestingly there is not a single PRC media source even reporting the below
Hence, China will only respond postively to concern over possible support on Xinjaing.
On the whole, It is an interesting furture we have given the new China has not hesitated to call all Indians inferior in its national mouthpiece and India has not hesitated to call Taiwan a nation is its national newspaper
