What's new

China says it blocked UN ban on JeM chief Masood Azhar because of 'different views'

your friend always need us in dirty job
bridge for china relation
ceto
cento
U-2
afghan part-1
stingers issue
somalia
afghanistan part-2

somalia was part of UN peace keeping mission
i dunno think you were doing any body favors. pakistani forces were doing their jobs
 
. . .
it is true americans exceeded their mission to go after Aidid
keep in mind somalia was a nightmare after Americans pulled out
it is even today its hell sir ji we just wasted our lives for them
 
.
Supporting terrorists in international organizations -

They will need to keep doing it for a long time to come.
 
. . .
I do foresee the likes of Azhar Masoods and Hafiz Sayeds becoming actively motivated to help their 'brothers' in Uighur areas of China, 'Karma' has its own ways of settling things!

Here its more about which nation supports what and who in International arena.

India release him sir ji with free delivery .

Azhar Masood was released because 'IC 814 was hijacked with 176 Indian passengers and 15 Crew




*************


http://zeenews.india.com/news/india...hina-appoints-new-envoy-to-india_1938109.html

Beijing: Amid fresh tensions between the two countries over India's attempts at the United Nations to designate JeM chief Masood Azhar as global terrorist, China has appointed Luo Zhaohui as its new ambassador to India.

Lou's appointment by President Xi Jinping is in consonant with the decision of the National People's Congress' Standing Committee, China's top legislature.

The 54-year-old diplomat earlier served as the country's envoy to Canada from 2014 to 2016, the state-run Xinhua reported.

Luo had also served as the director general of the Department of Asian Affairs under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs from 2011 to 2014.

Former Chinese ambassador to India Le Yucheng had left New Delhi in April.

The appointment comes amid fresh tension between the two countries over Pakistan-based Masood Azhar whom India perceive as the fountain head of terror.

China on Saturday defended its “second technical hold” to prevent a UN ban on Masood Azhar, saying there were "different views" on India's application and that Beijing's move will allow more time for the "relevant parties" to have consultations.

Reacting to India's criticism that its second hold on attempts to ban Azhar sends a dangerous message, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said that the listing application member states submitted to the 1267 Committee of UN "must comply" with specific requirements of relevant resolutions of UN Security Council (UNSC).

Though China is the lone member among the 15-member UNSC to oppose the ban on Azhar, Beijing claims that "different views" existed about India's application against Azhar.

"There are still different views on India's listing application made this March.

The technical hold on it will allow more time for the Committee to deliberate on the matter and for relevant parties to have further consultations," the ministry said in a written reply to PTI to a question.

The reference to "further consultations" apparently referred to direct consultations between India and Pakistan over the issue.

China had put the first technical hold six months ago on India's application following Azhar's alleged involvement in the Pathankot terrorist attack.

China had extended the second technical hold valid for three months during this week despite several consultations between New Delhi and Beijing at various levels.

(With agency inputs)
 
. .
That itself is enough proof that he is a terrorist.

The Chinese support of the terrorist is only because he is pakistani now and that it is against India.
Sir ji think otherwise you left him free and wan5 china pak take action against him?jo apka jahaz highjack ker sakta hai wo china pak ka bhi ker sakta hai
 
.
Sir ji think otherwise you left him free and wan5 china pak take action against him?jo apka jahaz highjack ker sakta hai wo china pak ka bhi ker sakta hai

Azhar Masood would not been arrested by Indian forces if he was a civilian on first place .

Masood Azhar, who was released by the Indian authorities from Kot Bhalwal Jail, Jammu, in December 1999. He was among the three terrorists who were released. Mushtaq Zargar of militant outfit Al-Umar-Mujahideen and Omar Saeed Sheikh, who later beheaded Wall Street Journal’s Daniel Pearl in captivity in Pakistan, were the other two.

The Army caught Masood accidentally during a routine checking near Anantnag in early 1994. He was working with the Harkat-ul-Ansar and had come to Kashmir to recruit cadres for the outfit as locals were distancing themselves from armed militancy. He had travelled to India on a Portuguese passport in which his occupation was shown as “journalist”.

he was the main actor of the Pakistan’s ISI , Two British were kidnapped by the Harkat-ul-Ansar group in June 1994 from the heights of Pahalgam, the same spot from where a year later five foreigners were abducted, for his release. After these kidnappings failed to yield his release, the IC 814 plane was hijacked midair between Kathmandu and Delhi.

After his release, he found his way to Karachi from Afghanistan and launched in February 2000 the Jaish-e-Mohammad, which is now acknowledged as a terrorist group, except in the eyes of its patron Pakistan and its all-time friend China.
 
.
I do foresee the likes of Azhar Masoods and Hafiz Sayeds becoming actively motivated to help their 'brothers' in Uighur areas of China, 'Karma' has its own ways of settling things!
3879174708146366278.jpg

60C8ADD1339A962C7C013008743BDEE3.jpg

70307_4408504_473679.jpg

W020140530290189711692.jpg


1378591.jpg

001q5CzIzy6ULn9vWJ74d&690.jpg

6168cf41ha2e9187c17ae&690.jpg


1369792361803.jpg


So, what are you talking about? I don't understand. Please say it again.

Last Updated: Saturday, October 8, 2016 - 20:02
http://zeenews.india.com/news/india...azhar-because-of-different-views_1938062.html

Beijing: China on Saturday defended its second technical hold to prevent a UN ban on Pakistan-based JeM chief Masood Azhar saying there were "different views" on India's application and that Beijing's move will allow more time for the "relevant parties" to have consultations.

Reacting to India's criticism that its second hold on attempts to ban Azhar sends a dangerous message, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said that the listing application member states submitted to the 1267 Committee of UN "must comply" with specific requirements of relevant resolutions of UN Security Council (UNSC).

Though China is the lone member among the 15-member UNSC to oppose the ban on Azhar, Beijing claims that "different views" existed about India's application against Azhar.

"There are still different views on India's listing application made this March. The technical hold on it will allow more time for the Committee to deliberate on the matter and for relevant parties to have further consultations," the ministry said in a written reply to PTI to a question seeking its response to India's strong criticism.

The reference to "further consultations" apparently referred to direct consultations between India and Pakistan over the issue.

China had put the first technical hold six months ago on India's application following Azhar's alleged involvement in the Pathankot terrorist attack.

China had extended the second technical hold valid for three months during this week despite several consultations between New Delhi and Beijing at various levels.

It is expected to figure again during the expected meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the BRICS summit to be held in Goa from October 15-16.

While opposing the ban against Azhar, the Chinese Foreign Ministry however said "China firmly supports combating all forms of terrorism, stronger international cooperation against terrorism, and supports the central and coordinating role of the UN in international counter-terrorism cooperation".

It said, China always maintains that on the listing matter, the 1267 Committee should stick to the principles of objectivity, impartiality and professionalism, base its judgments on solid evidence and decide upon consensus among the members of the Security Council.

Without naming China, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Vikas Swarup said on October 6 that only one country had put the technical hold, blocking the ban by another three months, and criticised the completely "non-transparent and anonymous" manner of designating individuals by the UN Sanctions Committee.

India has been highlighting the cross-border terror threat emanating from Pakistan and tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad are on the rise since last month's Uri attack in Jammu and Kashmir which killed 19 Indian soldiers.

PTI

First Published: Saturday, October 8, 2016 - 19:57
I am sure. 99.9% of Chinese people don't know him...
Wait a minute.
What's his name?
 
Last edited:
. . .
http://zeenews.india.com/news/india...ins-in-name-of-counter-terrorism_1938367.html

Last Updated: Monday, October 10, 2016 - 14:56

Beijing: Days after preventing a United Nations ban on Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Muhammad (JeM) chief Masood Azhar, China on Monday said that no one should pursue 'political gains in the name of counter-terrorism'.


Briefing media ahead of President Xi Jinping's visit to India this week to take part in the BRICS Summit in Goa, China's Vice Foreign Minister Li Baodong, however, added: "China is opposed to all forms of terrorism".

Replying to a question on criticism about China's move to stall India's bid for a UN ban on Azhar, Li, in a veiled reference to India, said: "There should be no double standards on counter-terrorism. Nor should one pursue own political gains in the name of counter-terrorism."

Last week also, China had defended its second technical hold on attempts to ban Azhar, saying there were "different views" on India's application.

Reacting to India's criticism that its action sends a dangerous message, the Chinese Foreign Ministry had said that the listing application member states submitted to the 1267 Committee of UN "must comply" with specific requirements of relevant resolutions of UN Security Council (UNSC).

Though China is the lone member among the 15-member UNSC to oppose the ban on Azhar, Beijing had claimed that "different views" existed about India's application against Azhar.

China had put the first technical hold six months ago on India's application following Azhar's alleged involvement in the Pathankot terrorist attack.

China had extended the second technical hold valid for three months during last week despite several consultations between New Delhi and Beijing at various levels.

It is expected to figure again during the expected meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the BRICS summit to be held in Goa from October 15-16.

Without naming China, India's External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Vikas Swarup said on October 6 that only one country had put the technical hold and criticised the completely "non-transparent and anonymous" manner of designating individuals by the UN Sanctions Committee.

India has been highlighting the cross-border terror threat emanating from Pakistan and tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad are on the rise since last month's Uri attack in Jammu and Kashmir which killed 19 Indian soldiers.

Xi will travel to Goa to attend the BRICS Summit scheduled to held between October 15-16. The BRICS grouping consists of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa.


First Published: Monday, October 10, 2016 - 10:46
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom