What's new

China reorganises PLA with an eye on Tibet, Xinjinag

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
SOURCE : Opednews.com

china-army-feb22-1_647_021116115140.jpg


China’s perceptions about the world around it have had an important influence on its recent decisions to reform its military. Also, the reforms are aimed at maintaining the supremacy of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) whose primary responsibility is to ensure single-party rule in China. So surprise the provincial military commands have been placed under the control of newly set -up National Defence Mobilization Department which is a party of President Xi Jinping –led Central Military Commission.

These are, of course, well known observations and, therefore, would not be saying anything new. However, there is another angle to the Chinese ‘dream’ action. Seen from the focus of peripheral diplomacy which President Xi Jinping unfolded two years ago, the South China Sea is the main focus area, in terms of China establishing its territorial sovereign rights over a energy rich area and ensuring that the US rebalance to East Asia remains only in name.

The other aspect of the South China Sea is the assertion of the greater role being played by the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) in waters further and further beyond China’s shores. The PLAN aims to convert itself into a blue water navy and it is symbolic of China’s efforts to protect its sea lines of communication. Essentially for two reasons: one to protect the country’s energy security which is coming mainly from the Persian Gulf; two to become a naval power which can reach Africa where China has a number of commercial and economic interests.

China’s major concerns internally remain focused on Buddhist Tibet and Muslim majority Xinjiang that borders Pakistan. Therefore, the next aspect of its military reorganization relates to having the unity of command in the military to handle internal crises. At the end of the day, there is a lesson here for India as the change in the pecking order of the Tibet Military Command indicates that China intends to ensure that India does not meddle in Tibet.

With an eye on India, China has also raised the level of the Tibet Military Command’s authority and placed it directly under the command of the People’s Liberation Army ground forces. The rank and status of the Western Tibet Military Command has been elevated widening the scope of its missions and combat preparedness.

The move would raise its authority, including the designation of troops, but also “expand their function and mission”, the deputy director of the Political Work Department of the Tibet Military Command, Zhao Zhong, was quoted as saying. This would also boost their combat readiness.

The Tibet Military Command, however, will be directly under the PLA Ground Force, headed by General Li Zuocheng, who sits on the CMC. Its political rank will be elevated to one level higher than its counterpart provincial-level military commands and will come under the leadership of the PLA Army.

Global Times reports this suggested that “the command may undertake some kind of military combat mission in the future.” Tibet Military Command required “specialist mountain skills and long-range capabilities, which need the deployment of special military resources”.

The Xinjiang Military Command may also be elevated. The Tibetan and Xinjiang commands are under the newly created Western Theatre Command, the largest of five newly reorganised military regions of the PLA.

Before the reorganisation, the Xinjiang command was part of the military region responsible for the western sector of the border with India and the disputed Aksai Chin region, while the Tibet command fell under the military region responsible for the eastern sector of the border.

The crucial point that is often said and reiterated is that the current wave of military reform strengthens the hands of President Xi Jinping over the PLA and the degree of control he exerts over the armed forces will also allow the President greater command over internal security. This has implications for Tibet and Xinjiang also.

Early in 2016, China announced the restructuring of its four military departments into 15 organs under the Central Military Commission (CMC), a change that will centralize power under the CMC. The move is part of a push to reassert the absolute authority of the party commission headed by Xi and modernize the military’s organizational structure. Xi is also pressing ahead with the downsizing of the military by 300,000 members to eliminate many non-combat-related functions.

The new structure includes three Commissions – discipline inspection, politics and law, and science and technology – as well as the general office and five more: administration, auditing, international cooperation, reform and organizational structure, and strategic planning. There are six new departments: joint staff, political work, logistical support, equipment development, training, and national defense. Previously, all these functions were under four headquarters in the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) – General Staff, General Political, General Logistics and General Armaments.

The reshuffle of the CMC highlights the centralized leadership of the CMC in both administration and command of the PLA, which will ensure the multiple-department CMC becomes more efficient in supervision and coordination. It also embodies the military reform outline issued at the end of November 2015, which included adjusting CMC headquarters system and adopting multiple departments under the CMC.

The reshuffle means that the CMC can give direct orders to battle command zones in combat without notifying the General Staff department and different services. The establishment of Joint Staff Department means that China will focus on joint operations among all service branches, including the army, air force, navy and the rocket force.

The reorganization, which was officially launched on 1 January 2016 will fundamentally redefine the roles, missions and authorities among the services — particularly the People’s Liberation Army, or PLA — and the Central Military Command.

Under the new rules, China’s seven military regions will be replaced by joint-warfighting commands in charge of “war zones” or “theatres of operation.”

Should the proposed reforms be successfully implemented, the PLA will emerge as a much more capable, and lethal fighting force. At the core of operational reform will be streamlining command and control authority to better conduct “modern, information-intensive joint campaigns — especially in the maritime-aerospace battlespace domains, which are the domains in which PLA strategists believe China’s most pressing operational contingencies reside.

The vast reorganization carries risk, particularly in light of China’s current woes with a plunging stock market and slowing economy. Party officials have made economic progress the linchpin of its governing legitimacy. The military reforms will leave about 300,000 people out of jobs, and local economies could be affected as military regions are stood down. The reorganization is slated to be complete by 2020, but it could take longer if the new system is to operate efficiently.


http://asiantribune.com/node/89158
 
Isn't this 3 month old news, why are you re-plugging it now?
 
What are you talking about? How does this harm Indian interests? How is it connected to Modi? Have you ever, in the past, suffered from brain fever?
In case you have not followed up the news few months back, China has upgraded their border security agency and equated them as PLA. This will allow PLA more resources in Tibet. Opposition picked this point and tried to create storm out of tea cup.

Again I just proposed a theory, you can accept it or reject it.
 
In case you have not followed up the news few months back, China has upgraded their border security agency and equated them as PLA. This will allow PLA more resources in Tibet. Opposition picked this point and tried to create storm out of tea cup.

Again I just proposed a theory, you can accept it or reject it.

He has a point.
 
In case you have not followed up the news few months back, China has upgraded their border security agency and equated them as PLA. This will allow PLA more resources in Tibet. Opposition picked this point and tried to create storm out of tea cup.

Again I just proposed a theory, you can accept it or reject it.

My questions remain exactly as they are. There is no visible connection. What storm in a tea-cup is there when there is an internal re-organisation of the PLA? And secondly, this was not an upgradation of their border security agency. Please read the full report.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom