China Releases the Original Galwan Chinese Indian Clash Video

[GumNaam]

Chinese and Pakistanis are still in denial. Maybe someday you guys can overcome your pain, humiliation, and embarrassment.

Chinese and Pakistanis are just having the time of their lives right now trolling your humiliating defeat!

 

[Cheepek]

who believes the earth is flat?

Happens when you mindlessly search your fantasies on YouTube.
The title is a clickbait! Enough to fool you!

 

[GumNaam]

Happens when you mindlessly search your fantasies on YouTube.
The title is a clickbait! Enough to fool you!

and its enough to shove an egg up your sanghi posterior!

 

[Thorough Pro]

everyone knows indians are liars

The footage shows a very different story from Indian account of the incident

Indian soldiers unarmed and caught by surprise in China clash, families say

Indian soldiers unarmed and caught by surprise in China clash, families say

Indian soldiers who died in close combat with Chinese troops last month were unarmed and surrounded by a larger force on a steep ridge, Indian government sources, two soldiers deployed in the area and families of the fallen men said.

www.reuters.com

 

[PakFactor]

I remember Indian media said Indian soldiers suffered heavy casualties because Chinese soldiers ambushed them. How shameless.

View attachment 717713View attachment 717714

So this is what it looks like when a group of rats cross over.

 

[krash]

Why do you think Indian Govt will release video if they have. Currently it is BJP govt, they use it during next lokshaba election. Same thing they did for surgical strike as well.

Same thing with "surgical strike"? So claiming fictitious strikes wasn't enough, you are now going to claim that you released fictitious videos of it too?

It's been +5 years since "Surgical Strikes: The beginning", and +2 years since "Surgical Strikes: The Return". No one has ever seen any proof in any way, shape, or form.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

Certain South Asians are great at ambushing, lying and backstabbing, but when it comes time to put money where the mouth is, they are nowhere to be seen.

 

[siegecrossbow]

Same thing with "surgical strike"? So claiming fictitious strikes wasn't enough, you are now going to claim that you released fictitious videos of it too?

It's been +5 years since "Surgical Strikes: The beginning", and +2 years since "Surgical Strikes: The Return". No one has ever seen any proof in any way, shape, or form.

I think he meant the Bollywood movie version of events when he talked about the Indian video.

 

[D-day]

TBH I am disappointed with the Chinese response. India attacks them first and kills 5 of their men. Their response is just killing back 20. If the same thing would have happened to US forces, the aggressor would have been smoked in the air. Chinese lost the opportunity. The other countries in Chinese neighborhood would not take them much seriously.

 

[Khan vilatey]

Muhahahahahahahahhahahahahaha

wow 20+78 vs 4, that’s a 24:1 ratio in China’s favor

k

 

[tower9]

Indians lying again, what a surprise.

 

[SuperStar20]

Same thing with "surgical strike"? So claiming fictitious strikes wasn't enough, you are now going to claim that you released fictitious videos of it too?

It's been +5 years since "Surgical Strikes: The beginning", and +2 years since "Surgical Strikes: The Return". No one has ever seen any proof in any way, shape, or form.

Whatever may be the content of the video. It was released during general election. Same thing will happen for PLA death/captive video.

 

[GumNaam]

TBH I am disappointed with the Chinese response. India attacks them first and kills 5 of their men. Their response is just killing back 20. If the same thing would have happened to US forces, the aggressor would have been smoked in the air. Chinese lost the opportunity. The other countries in Chinese neighborhood would not take them much seriously.

not true. Russians injured a bunch of american troops in syria with no significant response from the u.s. the fact of the matter is that just as the u.s. and Russia won't risk a nuclear escalation, China won't either so they took an escalate-deescalate-reescalate approach with india, basically death by a thousand cuts, drain them in the long run while hitting their economy...india's dirty little secret is that with the risk of a nuclear exchange with a huge power like China, investments were fast leaving india which was one of the driving factors for india to fold and accept China's 1959 LAC. the harsh reality is that india is not conventionally strong enough to even handle a nation 1/6th its size like Pakistan, you think they stand a chance against China? no they don't. india's only fallback is nuclear, so even though China would've ripped india an even bigger bunghole, they can't risk a nuclear escalation. don't forget, there isn't an ocean seperating China and india and india has a way of panicking and reach for the red button.

 

[D-day]

not true. Russians injured a bunch of american troops in syria with no significant response from the u.s. the fact of the matter is that just as the u.s. and Russia won't risk a nuclear escalation, China won't either so they took an escalate-deescalate-reescalate approach with india, basically death by a thousand cuts, drain them in the long run while hitting their economy...india's dirty little secret is that with the risk of a nuclear exchange with a huge power like China, investments were fast leaving india which was one of the driving factors for india to fold and accept China's 1959 LAC. the harsh reality is that india is not conventionally strong enough to even handle a nation 1/6th its size like Pakistan, you think they stand a chance against China? no they don't. india's only fallback is nuclear, so even though China would've ripped india an even bigger bunghole, they can't risk a nuclear escalation. don't forget, there isn't an ocean seperating China and india and india has a way of panicking and reach for the red button.

According to you Chinese have to accept Indian aggression in the future also. It was an opportunity for Chinese to show the world its military power. They have let Indian escape without paying much price. I am not accepting Chinese to strike Delhi, but punishing them in LOC would have been enough.

 

[GumNaam]

According to you Chinese have to accept Indian aggression in the future also. It was an opportunity for Chinese to show the world its military power. They have let Indian escape without paying much price. I am not accepting Chinese to strike Delhi, but punishing them in LOC would have been enough.

uhm...india lost almost 1100 sq km to China in less than 24 hours as per the indian defence minister's own admission. that, they haven't given an inch back, its a part of China now. That's a pretty impressive display of power as far as I'm concerned.