Some of Chinese professional considered it's a failure test.
1) PDV is not KKV which means hit-to-kill. The accuracy of +/-0.05m rocket controlling (a must for KKV missile) is obviously out of India's industrial capacity. The declared 6 previous "successful" test are badly suspected.
2) Radar of PDV is from Russia, IR sensor are from Israel.
3) Better performed THAAD weights 900kg, HQ-9 1600kg. PDV weights 5000kg.
4) India territory is not big enough to test real anti-ballistic (range > 2000km ) missiles.
Which means your Han "expats " are as delusional as your typical mangomen (read common men) gets.
1.PDV was never meant to be a KKV,so what's your point troll??You think an explosive warhead can not do the job??Even your much vaunted and over-hyped HQ 9 missiles also use explosive warheads,so those are useless as well then I suppose??
And what was that bull crap about Indian industrial complex being unable to design a precise enough rocket propulsion for KKV again you ignorant fool??Do you even know that our AAD doesn't have an explosive warhead and has been using Kinetic kill from its first test launch you fool??
2.Prove it you bloody Chinese liar!!Both the Ku band active radar seeker and the cryogenically cooled long wave passive imaging infrared seeker is developed by IRDE and produced by Datapatterns you ignorant fool.
3.Of course THAAD is currently better and much more matured than PDV.What you saw of PDV was just a prototype.
But don't compare with your HQ 9 clone of a Soviet junk,it's ignominious for PDV.
The original Soviet junk S 300PMU2 which you HQ 9 is copied from had repeatedly failed to achieve its goal in India during the mid 90s and that's the reason DRDO started our own BMD program.
And on what ground you claim that HQ 9 is better??It's 30 km interception altitude and speed of Mach 4 can no way make it better than PDV as it exists now.Heck they are not even in the same class - while HQ 9 is an endo atmospheric interceptor,the PDV is an exoatmospheric one.Only a fool like you would compare both systems.
HQ 9 is more comparable to our AAD in terms of guidance techniques,interception altitude and top speed.
4.One doesn't need to fire a 2000+ range ballistic missile to test the effectiveness of the BMD against such a missile,a shorter range missile mimicking the trajectory,apogee and re-entry velocity of a longer range missile will suffice for now.
Do not venture out into uncharted territory with your monumental level of ignorance boyo,could be dangerous for your high iq Han brain.
