shuttler
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 9,253
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
The difference is, based on India's spotless non proliferation record, India received an exemption from NSG, passed by a majority vote of Nuclear suppliers group.
With all the Indian nuclear facilities(under this deal), will be for peaceful civilian use only(producing electricity) and will be under IAEA safeguard..where as there are no such restrictions on Pakistan..which usually uses its Chinese supplied reactors for military purposes.
Many american criminals buy their guns and amunitions with spotless records.
From the article:
India has been the main factor that has influenced China and Pakistan’s policies vis-a-vis each other.Whereas Pakistan wants to gain access to civilian and military resources from China to balance the Indian might in the subcontinent, China, viewing India as potential challenger in the strategic landscape of Asia, views Pakistan as it central instrument to counter Indian power in the region.
China and Pakistan have to advance and carry on their own policies with or without india or japan. Pakistan wants to build its infrastructure which includes electricity supply urgently. China is there to help. What is wrong with that? If japan or another country who can provide the same or better works to the builiding of the plants, I am sure Pakistan will enter into contracts with the other country, not with China. This "conspiration" theory is just sick to the core!
But with India’s ascent in global hierarchy and American attempts to carve out a strong partnership with India, China’s need for Pakistan is only likely to grow.
india can go on their own diplomatic relationships with any country. The same applies to China and Pakistan. It is not a zero-sum game. The article is the most narrow-minded and very short-sighted