What's new

China opposes putting pressure on Syria

Syria will never be invaded, because there is Russian base down there, and if USA even tries to bomb Syria, Israel's gonna take large casualties.
 
.
SIPRI is drawing a blank here on that.

http://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/html/export_values.php




We'd like to see you try for sure , that"ll give Holocaust a totally new meaning with popular Chinese examples

not legally, of course: U.S. Spies Can't Stop Buying Fake Microchips from China - Technology - The Atlantic Wire

Why should China not raise this issue? What's India going to do if we do raise the legitimate issue of India killing 6000 people per day? Nazi Germany only killed 3300 Jews per day on average during WW2. Why should this obvious violation of human rights be ignored, just because its india? India kills more in 8 hours than Assad kills in 6 months.
 
. .
.
.
Guys I think we are going a little bit off topic here. Blood letting although unfortunate and regrettable in all developments to modern democracy there is a period where there are deaths. The English had it a lot erlier when Cromwell a dictator came into power in the UK.The story of the french revolution is the same. The point is when a country goes through these transition periods should there be interference from outside. How and when do we decide when to interfere, Saudies are a dictatorship there were some noises there about democracy. Bahrain there have been demonstrations and killings. Yemen there has been trouble. Who decides when to interfere, when to move into a country and back one side or the other in civil unrest. Why move into libya and syria but not against other places where we are informed there is oppression. Simply if even 20% people in any country decided to come on the streets no country would be able to stop changes. Even Pakistan with a large standing army would not be able to resist 32 million people on the streets for 1 week. So I would say that say in libya where there has been extensive help in the way of nato backing one side and it has taken 6 months for rebels to claim tripoli there is something wrong and the maijority of the population do not support the rebels. Lets look at the example of the Romanian revolution where there was a genuine uprising without external interference it took a week to get rid of the regime.

So I agree with chinese russian and even indian govts not to be over keen on interventions. Also when there is no intervention one can be sure that whatever the result it is genuinly representative of the people.
 
.
Right -says the guy who thinks CIA is all around him and ubiquitous :) Btw- what's your profession in Canada? curious. actually nvm - disregard-- have the floor ...

my profession? im a student, and wdf is your problem you claim something and then got no proofs to back it up, now when did i say that cia is all around me? dont be a sore loser and stop making up sh!t that i did not say. dont comeback with your same old repeating crap, just tell me where did i say that and prove me wrong, is that too much work.
 
.
Guys I think we are going a little bit off topic here. Blood letting although unfortunate and regrettable in all developments to modern democracy there is a period where there are deaths. The English had it a lot erlier when Cromwell a dictator came into power in the UK.The story of the french revolution is the same. The point is when a country goes through these transition periods should there be interference from outside. How and when do we decide when to interfere, Saudies are a dictatorship there were some noises there about democracy. Bahrain there have been demonstrations and killings. Yemen there has been trouble. Who decides when to interfere, when to move into a country and back one side or the other in civil unrest. Why move into libya and syria but not against other places where we are informed there is oppression. Simply if even 20% people in any country decided to come on the streets no country would be able to stop changes. Even Pakistan with a large standing army would not be able to resist 32 million people on the streets for 1 week. So I would say that say in libya where there has been extensive help in the way of nato backing one side and it has taken 6 months for rebels to claim tripoli there is something wrong and the maijority of the population do not support the rebels. Lets look at the example of the Romanian revolution where there was a genuine uprising without external interference it took a week to get rid of the regime.

So I agree with chinese russian and even indian govts not to be over keen on interventions. Also when there is no intervention one can be sure that whatever the result it is genuinly representative of the people.

lots of people still support ghadafi,
 
.
my profession? im a student, and wdf is your problem you claim something and then got no proofs to back it up, now when did i say that cia is all around me? dont be a sore loser and stop making up sh!t that i did not say. dont comeback with your same old repeating crap, just tell me where did i say that and prove me wrong, is that too much work.

go read my post about the CIA again- I was being facetious ( which missed you by a mile)and as I stated your lack of understanding the English language nuances or comprehension made me take pity on you and thus I let it die.

another example- was when I posted (not directed at you) to the poster Syrian Christian that just because Assad makes it easier for Christians- that alone was not a good reason to allow innocent Muslims to die and you came with
hey shut up, dont make me open my mouth about your religion now, so calm your @rse down.

---- right there your showed lack of comprehension...AGAIN!
 
.
go read my post about the CIA again- I was being facetious ( which missed you by a mile)and as I stated your lack of understanding the English language nuances or comprehension made me take pity on you and thus I let it die.

another example- was when I posted (not directed at you) to the poster Syrian Christian that just because Assad makes it easier for Christians- that alone was not a good reason to allow innocent Muslims to die and you came with

---- right there your showed lack of comprehension...AGAIN!

no actually i got two awards for reading and writing so dont tell me that i lack in understanding english.

plus you got no proof to back up your claims. just tell me already or dont claim anything next time.
 
.
Maybe because we are behind every country? Including India. We did not blame your killing insurgents

6000 children perished daily because off hunger, and India exports food, we did not say anything.

Exactly. Just how India has your back. You did Tienanmen square, you forcefully occupied Tibet, you did cultural revolution and erased so many identities from China apart from Han Chinese, you marginalised people in their own provinces where they are minority now, you started deciding how many children should your citizens have but we did not say anything. :) After ALL OF THESE you're still starving millions of poors then what's the point? No political freedom no wealth. My heart goes to average Chinese but we still didn't say anything. :)

Unlike our western friends.

Secret atrocities of Chinese regime - Columnists - Yorkshire Post
Germany: Practitioners Expose the Chinese Regime's Atrocities at Wagner Festival (Photos) - Falun Dafa (Falun Gong) Clearwisdom.Net
Finland: Exposing the Chinese Communist Regime?s Atrocities. | Clearharmony - Falundafa in Europe
France: "It is a Shame! These Atrocities Will be Condemned by All the Nations of the World!" | Clearharmony - Falundafa in Europe
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom