Far less than what Indians lost at LOC.
By the way Afghan casualties are already at all time high right now. Much more than Pakistan lost in last 15 years of WOT.
New Recruit
Read their statement properly on 'either side'. So what this means is 400 soldier were camping, then 360 went back to their side of the border, left 40. So on either side, they have 400. Basically trying to save face for retreating.
Unless this site is blocked in Communist China - do read this -Read their statement properly on 'either side'. So what this means is 400 soldier were camping, then 360 went back to their side of the border, left 40. So on either side, they have 400. Basically trying to save face for retreating.
Lul ENGRISSHHH class from chinese... Man i have seen it all in PDFRead their statement properly on 'either side'. So what this means is 400 soldier were camping, then 360 went back to their side of the border, left 40. So on either side, they have 400. Basically trying to save face for retreating.
That's the point.
Good thing too. 1 line is usually enough to send Pakistani leaders scampering to the US or UN or anyone else to bawl.
Pakistan's GDP gowth is lowest in Indian subcontinent since independence thanks to AMerica's war on Aboattabad! How many news link you want? India's gowth is highest.
Either side means 400 Chinese soldiers and 400 Indian soldiers. 360 Indian soldiers on Indian border and 40 in Doklam.
Runs to 1971.
No it is the pain and beating that you got at LOC. And 1971 isn't going help with that.
Hindustan produces cr@p. It has highest rate in that.
http://www.khaleejtimes.com/business/economy/pakistans-gdp-growth-at-10-year-high
https://tribune.com.pk/story/1452332/pakistans-gdp-growth-rate-even-higher-china-harvard-study/
And it is growth not gowth. What the f*Ck is that Hindustani kachra?
And that UN and US scampering is enough to force India searching for heads of its "jawans".
Yes. The arrangement suits us. You just continue surrendering.Okay. Then you would keep getting what is better.
