What's new

China Masters Modern Weapons Technology

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
China Masters Modern Weapons Technology

September 28, 2010:

China is rapidly becoming a major manufacturer, and developer, of modern weapons. Russia, which involuntarily supplied much of the technology China needed, discovered this recently when they saw what Chinese engineers had done to the AL-31 engine that powers the Russian Su-27/30 and Chinese J-11 and J-10. As delivered from Russia, the AL-31 is good for 900 hours of operation.

Chinese engineers figured out how to tweak the design of the engine so that it lasted for 1,500 hours. This feat is part of a growing trend. At first, decades ago, China simply figured out how to build Russian weapons they had bought. But in the last decade, they have increasingly improved on those designs.

Most of this technology was just stolen from Russia, so now Russia is no longer selling China much of anything. In response, the state controlled Russian media is now featuring lots of pundits deploring the low performance of the Chinese arms industry, and how poorly they have copied Russian military technology. A recent flurry of reports disparaged Chinese attempts to copy the Russian Su-33 (an aircraft carrier version of the Su-27). This all rings hollow when you consider how the Chinese have already caught up with a lot of Russian military manufacturers, and are driving them out of business in some areas.

The earliest example was how, using stolen Russian technology, China is driving Russia out of the low-end weapons business. This has been going on for decades. In turn, Russian attempts to maintain their status as a major developer of military technology are fumbling, largely because of the sales stolen by China. Increasingly, China is undercutting Russian sales efforts with similar weapons containing lots of stolen Russian technology. The Chinese won't invest as much in developing new technology, and the Russians can no longer afford to. So the second tier weapons markets slide further into mediocrity. Long term, however, China appears intent on eventually developing the most advanced weapons. Not now, not in the next decade, but eventually. And that means sooner rather than much, much later.

Through most (1960s-80s) of the Cold War, Russia (Soviet Union) had a well financed arms industry. Many innovative weapons were developed, but all this effort was hobbled by the fact that the Russian economy as a whole was very inefficient, and Russian industry could not build high tech as well, or reliably, as Western firms. Thus Russian high-tech gear always came in second to Western counterparts.

When the Cold War ended, so did the lavish spending on the Russian defense industries. Many, actually over half, of these weapons manufacturers went bankrupt, or converted to non-military production. Those that survived, did so by exporting weapons. Throughout the 1990s, the Russian armed forces could not afford to buy much new stuff. China came to the rescue in the 1990s, and over the next decade, bought nearly $20 billion in Russian arms. But China also began to blatantly copy lots of the Russian tech, and build their own. Thus, not surprisingly, for the last five years, Chinese orders have shrunk, while production of copies of Russian tech have increased. In some cases, Russia has simply refused to sell China high tech stuff, to avoid having it copied.

In the 1990s, Chinese manufacturing capabilities were so far behind that Russia believed their lead would never disappear. But with Russian military manufacturing largely stalled for the last two decades, and the Chinese economy booming (over 10 percent growth per year), the Russians are horrified to realize that the Chinese are catching up, and fast. For example, China believes it will be free from dependence on Russia for military jet engines within the next five (or so) years.

Currently, China imports two Russian engines, the $3.5 million AL-31 and the $2.5 million RD-93 (a version of the MiG-29's RD-33) for the JF-17 (a F-16 type aircraft developed in cooperation with Pakistan.) But in the meantime, Chinese engineers have managed to master the manufacturing techniques needed to make a Chinese copy of the Russian AL31F engine. This Chinese copy, the WS10A, is part of a program that has also developed the WS13, to replace the RD-93.

China has long copied foreign technology, not always successfully. But in the last decade, China has poured much money into developing a jet engine manufacturing capability. The Chinese encountered many of the same problems the Russians did when developing their own engine design and construction skills. But China has several advantages. First, they knew of the mistakes the Russians had made, and so were able to avoid many of them. Then there was the fact that China had better access to Western manufacturing technology (both legally and illegally). Finally, China was, unlike the Soviets, able to develop their engine manufacturing capabilities in a market economy. This was much more efficient than the command economy that the Soviets were saddled with for seven decades.

It is true, as the Russians like to point out, that the Chinese have taken a long time to develop some of their latest high-tech weapons (like the J-10 and JF-17 jet fighters, jet engines and many missile and electronic systems). But that's because the Chinese regarded these projects as learning exercises, and have not produced the resulting aircraft in large numbers. The Chinese use what they have learned for the next project, and they have made a lot of progress in two decades. China has already demonstrated an ability to build (and copy) world class technology. They now have the largest automobile industry on the planet. China can build things, and build them well. They learn from their mistakes, and they are surpassing their long time Russian mentors. The Russians know this is true, but they don't want to admit it.

China is still behind in several key areas, especially warships. They are making slow progress in developing nuclear submarines, and that's after decades of efforts. But they keep moving forward. More recently, China began working on building aircraft carriers. This effort is moving a lot faster, in part because of all the lessons learned in developing modern submarines. Same with other surface warships, like destroyers.

It was recently revealed that China was building a destroyer similar to current American models (the Burke class). Same pattern with smart bombs, electronic equipment and infantry equipment. The Chinese are coming, and they are moving faster.
 
. . .
Another racist rant about china stealing the technology of the western whites. all i have to say is this:

the F-22 is not patented.

if you have the guts and brains to gather information about a hostile power's military systems, copy it, mass produce it, and not suffer any negative consequences, then it isn't stolen, it is yours. how do you steal an idea that's not patented?

also, Russia signed a contract with us that includes transfer of technology for all their weapons. They effectively transfered all relevant intellectual property to us, this is again, not stealing. They could have easily refused to do so but the final result is the same, they'll just make less in sales (again, since weapons are not usually patented, there's no actual stealing going on).

and one more thing: the rare earth minerals used to manufacture US weapons are mined and processed in china. I suggest an export ban on dual use technology to the US, starting with both rare earth minerals and the processing technology.
 
.
...Russian industry could not build high tech as well, or reliably, as Western firms.

...

I think this guy doesn’t understand Soviet doctrine of weapon production.

Soviet had been devastated perhaps more than most countries by wars. Their doctrine of weapon production is that it is not worthwhile spending too much on making weapon’s (such as aircraft’s, aircraft engine’s, etc. ) life long. Why? Because if war breaks out, and aircrafts will be consumed fast and vastly. Thus 500hour life engine is probably having the same effect as 1000hour engine: they’ll be shot down anyways perhaps within 300hours.

But if you want to use weapons to maintain peace, that doctrine is not suitable.
 
.
Anybody remember the space shuttle built by the soviet? Compare it with the USA's version, and what do you think?

Of course, USA is not better, they do the same thing.

Military industry is all about killing. Who really cares those patents? You are not allowed to kill your enemy with a gun with a patent owned by your enemy?
 
. .
I think this guy doesn’t understand Soviet doctrine of weapon production.

Soviet had been devastated perhaps more than most countries by wars. Their doctrine of weapon production is that it is not worthwhile spending too much on making weapon’s (such as aircraft’s, aircraft engine’s, etc. ) life long. Why? Because if war breaks out, and aircrafts will be consumed fast and vastly. Thus 500hour life engine is probably having the same effect as 1000hour engine: they’ll be shot down anyways perhaps within 300hours.

But if you want to use weapons to maintain peace, that doctrine is not suitable.

to add on; while they are operational, soviet weapons were just as deadly as western ones; they just sold it to the wrong people. when the soviets used their weapons themselves, even in a failure like afghanistan their kill/death ratios were amazing.

afghanistan: 10000 soviet soldiers lost, 1 million afghans killed
vietnam: 60000 US soldiers lost (6x more), 4 million viets killed (only 4x).

in fact, the failed soviet occupation had less people in in than the current US occupation, much less vietnam. only 80,000-100,400 soviet soldiers served in afghanistan at any one time; troop levels in current afghanistan reached 150,000 and american involvement in vietnam reached 200,000 at 1965 december.

they lost less planes and less soldiers than the US did by ratio.

the soviets also stayed in afghanistan for 10 years. the US is on its 9th. the soviet union in 1988 was stable, strong, and showed no signs of collapse, much like the US. the USSR in 1992 no longer existed. USA, 1776-2014?
 
.
bad title, mastery of modern weapons technology means inovation, not production. A proper change would be China Masters Modern Weapons production, if such a thing could be quantified.
 
.
bad title, mastery of modern weapons technology means inovation, not production. A proper change would be China Masters Modern Weapons production, if such a thing could be quantified.

Yawn...:coffee:
 
.
if the developed countries attach importance to the weapon patents so much,
why they always send their spies to other counties to steal secret technology documents? just like Russia and USA
 
.
Let the achievements speak for themselves, after all, are achievements some how more if certified in some Western or Russian or any other corner? Just achieve, all else will fall in line.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom