White and Green with M/S
SENIOR MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/viceadmiral.jpg)
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2020
- Messages
- 7,946
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Being by inspired is not a bad thing why you hurt so muchYou are just talking nonsense, always try to slandering China.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Being by inspired is not a bad thing why you hurt so muchYou are just talking nonsense, always try to slandering China.
The two airplanes don't bear any resemblance from outside, let alone the 5 Generation systems inside, and Soviet didn't have them at all at the time.Being by inspired is not a bad thing why you hurt so much
Being inspired is not means copy but but you improved basic designThe two airplanes don't bear any resemblance from outside, let alone the 5 Generation systems inside, and Soviet didn't have them at all at the time.
I thought anti-ship missile technology, drones, hypersonic missiles, etc, etc, have made ship nearly obsolete in a time of war. China's naval build-up will only get it in trouble by making CCP leaders think they can bully everyone, just like forum members here accuse the USA of doing over past decades. Go ahead, spend your GDP on worthless military "stuff". You will gain nothing. Just as the USA has gained nothing from its gigantic military spending.
BS.Being inspired is not means copy but but you improved basic design
What part is bs in my post you didn't see similarity of J20 and MIG 1.44 design???
I'm not saying China doesn't have anti-ship missiles. I'm saying that a $100 Million ship can be destroyed by a $1M missile. So, it's foolish for China to build so many floating targets. And, who knows how much China spends on its military? Do you think the CCP would tell their own people, let alone the Pakistan Defense Forum how much they spend on anything?You make it sound like China doesn't make anti-ship missiles, drones, hypersonic missiles etc.
China's military spending is not high at all.
I'm not saying China doesn't have anti-ship missiles. I'm saying that a $100 Million ship can be destroyed by a $1M missile. So, it's foolish for China to build so many floating targets. And, who knows how much China spends on its military? Do you think the CCP would tell their own people, let alone the Pakistan Defense Forum how much they spend on anything?
None as I said.What part is bs in my post you didn't see similarity of J20 and MIG 1.44 design???
Than you also deny that CAC and MIG has a long relationship for aircraft design??None as I said.
Fool. CAC has nothing to do with MIG, its SAC that has to do with Soviets.Than you also deny that CAC and MIG has a long relationship for aircraft design??
Lol but jf17 is based on old Soviet designFool. CAC has nothing to do with MIG, its SAC that has to do with Soviets.
Which is MIG 1.44?What part is bs in my post you didn't see similarity of J20 and MIG 1.44 design???
Lol another troll that's a kfx design not J20 design